Is there a direct neural correlate for memory-trace formation in audition?

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1281-1284

  Ylinen, Sari ^a,b   Huotilainen, Minna ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b Helsinki Brain Research Center   (Finland)

Author keywords

Event related potential; Familiarity; Memory representation; Mismatch negativity; N1; Repetition positivity; Vowel

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; MEMORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34447542579     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32826fb38a     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Näätänen R, Gaillard AW, Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 1978; 42:313-329.
2. Näätänen R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology 2001; 38:1-21.
3. Picton TW, Alain C, Otten L, Ritter W, Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5:111-139.
4. Winkler I, Karmos G, Näätänen R. Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res 1996; 742:239-252.
5. Winkler I, Schröger E, Cowan N. The role of large-scale memory organization in the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13:59-71.
6. Haenschel C, Vernon DJ, Dwivedi P, Gruzelier JH, Baldeweg T. Event-related brain potential correlates of human auditory sensory memory-trace formation. J Neurosci 2005; 25:10494-10501.
7. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6:391-398.
8. Baldeweg T. Repetition effects to sounds: evidence for predictive coding in the auditory system. Trends Cogn Sci 2006; 10:93-94.
9. Winkler I, Cowan N. From sensory to long-term memory: evidence from auditory memory reactivation studies. Exp Psychol 2005; 52:3-20.
10. Huotilainen M, Kujala A, Alku P. Long-term memory traces facilitate short-term memory trace formation in audition in humans. Neurosci Lett 2001; 310:133-136.
11. Pantev C, Oostenveld R, Engelien A, Ross B, Roberts LE, Hoke M. Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature 1998; 392:811-814.
12. Meyer M, Baumann S, Jancke L. Electrical brain imaging reveals spatio-temporal dynamics of timbre perception in humans. Neuroimage 2006; 32:1510-1523.
13. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport 1997; 8:919-924.
14. Sharma A, Marsh CM, Dorman MF. Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108:3030-3035.
15. Parviainen T, Helenius P, Salmelin R. Cortical differentiation of speech and nonspeech sounds at 100 ms: implications for dyslexia. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15:1054-1063.
16. Mäkelä AM, Alku P, Tiitinen H. The auditory N1m reveals the left-hemispheric representation of vowel identity in humans. Neurosci Lett 2003; 353:111-114.
17. Obleser J, Elbert T, Lahiri A, Eulitz C. Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003; 15:207-213.
18. Shestakova A, Brattico E, Soloviev A, Klucharev V, Huotilainen M. Orderly cortical representation of vowel categories presented by multiple exemplars. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004; 21:342-350.
19. Eulitz C, Diesch E, Pantev C, Hampson S, Elbert T. Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli. J Neurosci 1995; 15:2748-2755.
20. Gootjes L, Raij T, Salmelin R, Hari R. Left-hemisphere dominance for processing of vowels: a whole-scalp neuromagnetic study. NeuroReport 1999; 10:2987-2991.
21. Poeppel D, Yellin E, Phillips C, Roberts TP, Rowley HA, Wexler K, et al. Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1996; 4:231-242.