Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: An overview

Journal Belge de Radiologie

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 163-166

  Van Ongeval, Ch ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHOTON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; X RAY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATA DISPLAY; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 34447529455     PISSN: 00217646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. rd edn. (2001) ISBN 92-894-1145-7.
2. Fischer U., Hermann K.P., Baum F.: Digital mammography: current state and future aspects. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16: 38-44.
3. Fischer U., Baum F., Obenauer S., et al.: Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12: 2679-2683.
4. Skaane P., Balleyguier C., Diekmann F., et al.: Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-observer perfomance study. Radiology, 2005, 237: 13-44.
5. Bonardi R., Ambrogetti D., Ciatoo S., Gentile E.: Conventional versus digital mammography in the analysis of screen-detected lesions with low positive predictive value. Eur J Radiol, 2005, 55: 258-263.
6. Pisano I.D., Cole E.B., Major S., et al.: Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. Radiology, 2000, 216: 820-830.
7. Vuylsteke P., Schoeters E.: Multiscale image contrast manipulaton (MUSICA). In: Edited by Hanson K. (Bellingham WA: SPIE) Vol 217, pp 551-560.
8. Van Ongeval C., Bosmans H., Van Steen A., Joossens K., Celis V., Van Goehem M., Verslegers I., Nijs K., Rogge F., Marchal G.: Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16: 1360-1366.
9. Bosmans H., Carton A.K., Rogge F., et al.: Overview of digital mammography image quality. Rad Prot Dos, 2005, 117: 120-130.
10. Noel A., Thibault F.: Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14: 1990-1998.
11. Van Ongeval C., Bosmans H., Van Steen A.: Current challenges of full field digital mammography. Rad Prot Dos, 2005, 117: 148-153.
12. st Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the FRNA, McCormick Plac, Chicago, November 2005.
13. Zheng B., Hardesty L.A., Poller W., et al.: Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment - initial experience. Radiology, 2003, 230: 595-597.
14. Moberg K., Bjurstam N., Wilczed B., et al.: Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers. Eur Radiol, 2001, 39: 104-110.
15. Obenauer S., Sohns C., Werner C., Grabbe E.: Computer-aided detection in full field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories. Geh Breast Journal, 2006, 12: 16-19.
16. Skaane P., Young K., Skjennald A.: Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - The Oslo I study. Radiology, 2003, 229: 877-884.
17. Lewin F.M., Hendrick R.E., D'Orsi C.J., Isaacs M.F.: Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4.945 paired examinations. Radiology, 2001, 218: 873-880.
18. Skaane P., Skjennald A.: Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program - The Oslo II Study. Radiology, 2004, 232: 197-204.
19. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., et al.: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J of Med, 2005, 353: 1773-1783.
20. Dershaw D.D.: Status of mammography after the digital mammography imaging screening trial: digital versus film. Breast J, 2006, 12: 99-102.
21. Ciatto S., Brancato B., Baglioni R., Turci M.: A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digtial as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting. Eur J Rad, 2005, 57 (1): 69-75.
22. Jong R.A., Jaffe M.J.: Digital Mammography: 2005. Can Assoc Radiol J, 2005, 56: 319-323.