End-of-life patients, intensive care and consent: Difficulties facing French intensivists

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 709-713

  Franchitto, N ^a   Vinour, H ^a   Gavarri, L ^b   Telmon, N ^a   Rouge, D ^a  

^a CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

^b Faculty of Law   (France)

Author keywords

Clinical; Ethics; France; Informed consent; Intensive care units; Mental competency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSCIOUSNESS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENSIVE CARE; LAW; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; UNCONSCIOUSNESS;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; DECISION MAKING; FRANCE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENSIVE CARE; MENTAL COMPETENCY; PALLIATIVE CARE; PATIENT RIGHTS; TERMINAL CARE; TREATMENT REFUSAL; WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;

EID: 34447527606     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021507000294     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. French Society of Critical Care: Les limitations et arrêt de thérapeutique(s) active(s) en réanimation adulte. Recommandations de la Société de Réanimation en Langue Française 2002. http://www.srlf.org/societe/infoethique/thera.active.html.
2. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Associations. Decisions near the end of life. JAMA 1992; 267: 2229-2233.
3. Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique pour les Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé: Refus de traitement et autonomie de la personne: Avis no. 87; avril 2005: available on line at: http//www.ccne-ethique.fr/francais/avis/ a_087.htm.
4. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of critical care medicine. Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge and triage. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 633-638.
5. Luce JM. Ethical principles in critical care. JAMA 1990; 263: 696-703.
6. Lanken P. American thoracic society position statement on withholding and withdrawing life sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med 1992; 115: 478-485.
7. Loi no 2005-370 du 22 avril 2005, relative aux droits des malades et à la fin de vie. Journal Officiel 23 avril 2005.
8. Loi no 2002-303 du 4 mars 2002, relative aux droits des malades et à la qualité du système de santé. Journal Officiel 05 mars 2002.
9. Luce JM, Alpers A. End-of-life care: what do the American courts say? Crit Care Med 2001; 29(Suppl): N40-N45.
10. Loi no 99-477 du 9 juin 1999, Journal Officiel 10 juin 1999.
11. Article 226-3 du Code Pénal: «Quiconque pouvant empêcher par son action immédiate, sans risque pour lui ou pour les tiers, soit un crime, soit un délit contre l'intégrité corporelle de la personne s'abstient volontairement de le faire est puni de cinq ans d'emprisonnement et de 75000 euros d'amende...». Ordonnance no 2000-916 du 19 septembre 2000 art. 3 Journal Officiel du 22 septembre 2000.
12. Turner JS, Michell WL, Morgan CJ et al. Withdrawal of life support. Frequency and practice in a London and Cape Town intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 1020-1025.
13. Vincent JL. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1626-1633.
14. Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F, French LATAREA Group. Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive care units in France: a prospective survey. Lancet 2001; 357: 9-14.
15. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155: 15-20.
16. Carlet J, Lambertus G Thijs, Antonelli M et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 770-784.
17. SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995; 274: 1591-1598.
18. Hanson LC, Tulsky JA, Danis M. Can clinical interventions change care at the end of life? Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 381-388.
19. Code de Déontologie Médicale, Article 37: «... la décision est prise par le médecin en charge du patient, après concertation avec l'équipe de soins si elle existe et sur l'avis motivé d'au moins un médecin, appelé en qualité de consultant...».
20. Le Conte P, Baron D, Trewick D et al. Withholding and withdrawal life-support therapy in an Emergency Department: prospective survey. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 2216-2221.
21. Fischer GS, Tulsky JA, Rose MR et al. Patient knowledge and physicians predictions of treatment preferences after discussion and advance directives. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 447-454.
22. Seckler AB, Meier DE, Mulvihill M, Cammer Paris BE. Substitute judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions? Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 92-98.
23. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 3044-3049.
24. Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S et al. Anxiety and depression in families of ICU patients: ethical considerations for decision making capacities. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 159: A923.
25. Article 7 de la loi du 22 avril 2005, Article L. 1111-11 du Code de Santé Publique.
26. Décret no 2006-119 du 06 février 2006, Article 1 Journal Officiel du 07 février 2006.
27. Teno J, Lynn J, Wenger N et al. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 47: 500-507.
28. Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB et al. Patients preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 1-12.
29. Roupie E, Santin A, Boulme R et al. Patients' preferences concerning medical information and surrogacy: result of a prospective study in a French emergency department. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 52-56.
30. Fournier V, Trarieux S. Les directives anticipées en France. Med and Droit 2005; 74-75: 146-148.
31. Manthous CA. Are living wills useful? In search of a new paradigm. Conn Med 2003; 67: 283-290.
32. Thorevska N, Tilluckdharry L, Tickoo S et al. Patient's understanding of advances directives and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Crit Care 2005; 20: 26-34.
33. Ferrand E, Lemaire F, Regnier B et al. Discrepancies between perceptions by physicians and nursing staff of intensive care unit end-of-life decisions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 163: 1310-1315.