The construction of HIV/AIDS in Indian newspapers: A frame analysis

Health Communication

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 257-266

  De Souza, Rebecca ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447526008     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410230701307733     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Airhihenbuwa, C., & Obregon, R. (2000). A critical assessment of theories/models used in health communication for HIV/AIDS. Journal of Health Communication, 5, 5-15.
2. Bardhan, N. (2002). Accounts from the field: A public relations perspective on global AIDS/HIV. Journal of Health Communication, 7, 221-244.
3. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps in an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
4. Beckett, K. (1996). Culture and the politics of significance: The case of child sexual abuse. Social Problems, 42, 57-76.
5. Conrad, C., & McIntush, H. G. (2003). Organizational rhetoric and healthcare policymaking. In T. Thompson, A. Dorsey, K. Miller, & R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Dutta-Bergman, M. (2004). The unheard voices of Santalis: Communicating about health from the margins of India. Communication Theory, 14, 237-263.
7. Dutta-Bergman, M. (2005). Theory and practice in health communication campaigns: A critical interrogation. Health Communication, 18, 103-122.
8. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-57.
9. Gamson, W., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373-393.
10. Gamson, W., & Lasch, K. (1983). The political culture of social welfare policy. In S. E. Spiro & E. Yuchtman-yaar (Eds.), Evaluating the welfare state: Social and political perspectives (pp. 397-115). New York: Academic.
11. Gamson, W., & Stuart, D. (1992). Media discourse as a symbolic contest: The bomb in political cartoons. Sociological Forum, 7, 55-86.
12. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkley: University of California Press.
13. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
14. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
15. Hilgartner, J., & Bosk, C. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 53-78.
16. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Kachru, B. B. (1986). The alchemy of English. The spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon.
18. Karnik, N. S. (2001). Locating HIV/AIDS and India: Cautionary notes of the globalization of categories. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26, 322-348.
19. Kline, K. N. (2003). Popular media and health: Images, effects, and institutions. In T. Thompson, A. Dorsey, K. Miller, & R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 557-581). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Lupton, D. (1998). The end of AIDS? AIDS reporting in the Australian press in the mid-1990s. Critical Public Health, 8, 33-46.
21. Myrick, R. (1998). AIDS discourse: A critical reading of mainstream press surveillance of marginal identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 35, 75-93.
22. National AIDS Control Organization. (2004). Annual report 2002-2004. New Delhi, India: Author.
23. Parrott, R. L. (1996). A women-centered "sense-making" approach to communicating about women's reproductive health. In R. L. Parrott & C. M. Condit (Eds.), Evaluating women's health messages (pp. 414-425). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Petersen, A., & Lupton, D. (1996). The new public health: Health and self in the age of risk. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
26. Petersen, M. A. (1998). The rhetoric of epidemic in India: New coverage of AIDS. Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics, 18, 237-268.
27. Press in India 2002: General review. (2005). Retrieved May, 15th, 2005, from http://rni.nic.in/
28. Schoepf, B. (2001). International AIDS research in anthropology: Taking a critical perspective on the crisis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 335-361.
29. Solomon, S., Chakraborty, A., & Yepthomi, R. (2004). A review of the HIV epidemic in India. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16(Suppl. A), 155-169.
30. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Treichler, P. (1988). AIDS, Homophobia and biomedical discourse: An epidemic of signification. In D. Crimp (Ed.), AIDS: cultural analysis, cultural activism, (pp. 31-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Treichler, P. (1999). How to have theory in an epidemic: Cultural chronicles of HIV/AIDS. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33. Tuchman, G. (1978a). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
34. Tuchman, G. (1978b). The news net. Social Research, 45, 253-276.
35. UNAIDS. (2004). 2004 report on the global AIDS epidemic: Executive summary. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).
36. Van Hollen, C. (2005). Nationalism, transnationalism, and the politics of "traditional" Indian medicine for HIV/AIDS. In J. Alter (Ed.), Asian medicine and globalization. (pp. 88-106). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37. Over, M., Heywood, P., Gold, J., Gupta, I., Hira, S., & Marseille, E. (2004). World Bank Report: Modeling the cost and consequences. Washington, DC: World Bank.