Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 54, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1389-1398

  Xu, Yifang ^a   Collins, Leslie M ^b  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Dynamic range; Frequency discrimination; High rate pulse train; Intensity discrimination; Neural response

Indexed keywords

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COMPUTATIONAL MODELS; DYNAMIC RANGE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HIGH-RATE PULSE TRAIN; INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION; NEURAL RESPONSE;

BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; RECURSIVE FUNCTIONS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; IMPLANT; LIVER SINUSOID; NERVE CELL; PREDICTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PULSE RATE; SIMULATION; STATISTICS; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; OSCILLOMETRY; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 34447518979     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.900800     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. N. Y. S. Kiang and E. C. Moxon, "Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear," Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., vol. 81, pp. 714-730, 1972.
2. L. M. Collins, R. L. Miller, and W. D. Ferguson, "On the relationship between noise and speech recognition in cochlear implant subjects: A theoretical and psychophysical study," presented at the 9th DSP Workshop, Waldemar Rach Resort, TX, 2000.
3. L. Litvak, B. Delgutte, and D. Eddington, "Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: Modulated and unmodulated pulse trains," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 368-379, 2001.
4. J. T. Rubinstein, B. S. Wilson, C. C. Finley, and P. J. Abbas, "Pseudospontaneous activity: Stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation," Hear. Res., vol. 127, pp. 108-118, 1999.
5. R. S. Hong and J. T. Rubinstein, "High-rate conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: Dynamic range measures with sinusoidal stimuli," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 3327-3342, 2003.
6. Y. Xu and L. M. Collins, "Predicting the threshold of single-pulse electrical stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: The effects of noise," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 825-835, Jul. 2003.
7. Y. Xu and L. M. Collins, "Predicting the threshold of noise-modulated pulse train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: The effects of stimulus noise," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 590-603, Apr. 2004.
8. I. C. Bruce et al., "A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: Single-pulse response," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 617-629, Jun. 1999.
9. I. C. Bruce et al., "A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: Pulse-train response," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 630-637, Jun. 1999.
10. Y. Xu and L. M. Collins, "Theoretical prediction of dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical noise-modulated pulse-train stimuli," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1040-1049, Jun. 2005.
11. I. C. Bruce, M. W. White, L. S. Irlicht, S. J. O'Leary, S. Dynes, and G. M. Clark, "A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: Low-rate stimulation," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 630-637, Jun. 1999.
12. C. A. Miller, P. J. Abbas, J. T. Rubinstein, and A. J. Matsuoka, The Neurophysiological Effects of Simulated Auditory Prosthesis Stimulation Univ. Iowa, Dept. Otolaryngol. - Head and Neck Surg. and Dept. Speech Pathol., Audiol.,, Iowa City, IA, 3rd Quart. Prog. Rep. NO1-DC-6-2111, 1997.
13. H. Mino, J. T. Rubinstein, and J. A. White, "Comparison of algorithms for the simulation of action potentials with stochastic sodium channels," Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 578-587.
14. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
15. D. A. Nelson, J. L. Scmitz, G. S. Donaldson, N. F. Viemeister, and E. Javel, "Intensity discrimination as a function of a stimulus level with electric stimulation," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 2393-2414, 1996.
16. A. C. Schroder, N. F. Viemeister, and D. A. Nelson, "Intensity discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 96, pp. 2683-2693, 1994.
17. M. Wojtczak, G. S. Donaldson, and N. F. Viemeister, "Intensity discrimination and increment detection in cochlear-implant users," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 114, pp. 396-407, 2003.
18. W. R. Drennan and B. E. Pfingst, "Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implant," Hear. Res., vol. 202, pp. 170-179, 2005.
19. H. Chen and F. G. Zeng, "Frequency modulation detection in cochlear implant subjects," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 116, pp. 2269-77, 2004.
20. B. E. Pfingst, "Operating ranges and intensity psychophysics for cochlear implants," Arch. Otolaryngol., vol. 110, pp. 140-144, 1984.
21. F. G. Zeng, J. J. Galvin, and C. Zhang, "Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve," NeuroReport, vol. 9, pp. 1845-1848, 1998.
22. M. J. Hacker and R. Ratcliff, "A revised table of d′ for M-alternative force choice," Perception Psychophys., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 168-170, 1979.
23. P. C. Loizou, "Mimicing the Human Ear," IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 101-130, Sep. 1998.