Usefulness of liquid-based preparation in urine cytology

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 626-629

  Hwang, Eu Chang ^a   Park, Seong Hoon ^a   Jung, Seung Il ^a   Kwon, Dong Deuk ^a   Park, Kwangsung ^a   Ryu, Soo Bang ^a   Park, Chang Soo ^a  

^a Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bladder tumor; Liquid based cytology; Urine cytology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BIOPSY; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MONOPREP2; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THINPREP; TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA; URINALYSIS; URINE CYTOLOGY;

CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; URINE;

EID: 34447517738     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01731.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ziger K, Olsen PR, Wolf H et al. Long-term follow-up of noninvasive bladder tumors (stage Ta). BJU Int. 2000 85 : 824 8.
2. Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ et al. Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. J. Urol. 1983 130 : 1083 6.
3. Kiemeney LALM, Witjes JA, Verbeek ALM et al. The clinical epidemiology of superficial bladder cancer. Br. J. Cancer 1993 67 : 806 12.
4. Wiener HG, Mian CH, Hiatel A et al. Can urine bound diagnostic tests replace cystoscopy in the management of bladder cancer? J. Urol. 1998 159 : 1876 80.
5. Ozen H, Hall CM. Bladder cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2000 12 : 255 9.
6. Lokeshwar VB, Soloway MS. Current bladder tumor tests: does their projected utility fulfill clinical necessity? J. Urol. 2001 165 : 1067 77.
7. Nasuti JF, Tam D, Gupta PK. Diagnostic value of liquid based (ThinPrep) preparation in non-gynecologic cases. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2001 24 : 137 41.
8. Linder J. Recent advances in thin-layer cytology. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1998 18 : 24 32.
9. Leung SW, Bedard YC. Immunocytochemical staining on ThinPrep processed smears. Mod. Pathol. 1996 9 : 304 6.
10. Tabbara SO, Sidawy MK, Frost AR et al. The stability of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression on breast carcinoma cells stored as PreservCyt suspension and as ThinPrep slides. Cancer 1998 84 : 355 60.
11. Tezuka F, Oikawa H, Shunki H et al. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology. Acta Cytol. 1996 40 : 513 18.
12. Bur M, Knowles K, Pekow P et al. Comparison of ThinPrep preparation with conventional cervicovaginal smears. Acta Cytol. 1995 39 : 631 42.
13. Dabbs DJ, Abendroth CS, Grenko RT et al. Immunocytochemistry on the ThinPrep processor. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1997 17 : 388 92.
14. Papillo JL, Lapen D. Cell yield: ThinPrep vs. cytocentrifuge. Acta Cytol. 1994 38 : 33 6.
15. Beech DP. A comparison of voided urine samples processed by the Cytyc ThinPrep Processor and the Shadon Cyto-Spin II (poster abstract). Acta Cytol. 1992 36 : 583.
16. Skacel M, Pettay JD, Tsiftsakis EK et al. Validation of a multicolour interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation assay for detection of transitional cell carcinoma on fresh and archival thin-layer, liquid-based cytology slides. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 2001 23 : 381 7.
17. Nam JH, Kim HS, Lee JS et al. A comparison of modified MonoPrep2 of liquid-based cytology with ThinPrep Pap test. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004 94 : 693 8.
18. Michael CW, McConnel J, Pecott J et al. Comparison of ThinPrep and TriPath PREP liquid-based preparations in non-gynecologic specimens; a pilot study. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2001 25 : 177 84.
19. Leung CS, Chiu B, Bell V. Comparison of Thinprep and conventional preparations: nongynecologic cytology evaluation. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1997 16 : 368 71.