Independent Analysis of Olympus Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs

Urology

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-15

  Canales, Benjamin K ^a   Gleason, Joseph M ^a   Hicks, Nathan ^a   Monga, Manoj ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RUBBER;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDOSCOPE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; URETEROSCOPE; URETEROSCOPY;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URETEROSCOPES;

EID: 34447512476     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.065     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Grasso M., and Bagley D. Small diameter, actively deflectable, flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol 160 (1998) 1648-1653
2. Monga M., Best S., Venkatesh R., et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective study. J Urol 176 (2006) 137-141
3. Afane J.S., Olweny E.O., Bercowsky E., et al. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 164 (2000) 1164-1168
4. Landman J., Lee D.I., Lee C., et al. Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 62 (2003) 218-222
5. White M.D., and Moran M.E. Fatigability of the latest generation of the latest generation ureteropyeloscope: Richard Wolf vs. Karl Storz. J Endourol 12 (1998) S182
6. Sung J.C., Springhart P., Marguet C.G., et al. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology 66 (2005) 958-963
7. Pietrow P.K., Auge B.K., Delvecchio F.C., et al. Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity. Urology 60 (2002) 784-788