Mass detection in mammography using principle component analysis and stepwise selection

Chinese Journal of Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 275-287

  Liao, Ping Sung ^a   Guo, Shu Mei ^b   Yu, Nan Sue ^b   Chen, Cheng Yi ^a   Lee, San Kan ^c   Chang, Chein I ^d  

^a CHENG SHIU UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c Yuanshan and Suao Veterans Hospital   (Taiwan)

^d Baltimore County   (United States)

Author keywords

Mammography; Mass detection; Neural network; PCA transformation; Principle component analysis (PCA); Stepwise Selection (SS)

Indexed keywords

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TISSUE STRUCTURE;

EID: 34447509888     PISSN: 10188940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. http://crs.cph.ntu.edu.tw/crs_c/annual. html
2. Zhou X, Gordon R. Detection of early breast cancer: An overview and future prospects. Critical Review in Biomedical Engineering 1989; 17: 203-255
3. Chinese source
4. American Cancer Society. The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program. http://www.doity-ourself.com/stry/breastcervicalcancer, 2006/08/31
5. Schmidt KF. A better breast test. Science News 1993; 143: 392-393
6. Lai SM, Li X, Bischof WF. On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Image 1990; 8: 377-386
7. Brzakovic D, Luo XM, Brzakovic P. An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Image 1990; 9: 233-241
8. Christoyianni I, Dermatas E, Kokkinakis G. Neural classification of abnormal tissue in digital mammography using statistical features of the texture. Proceedings of ICECS '99 1999; 1: 117-120
9. Christoyianni I, Dermatas E, Kokkinakis G. Fast detection of masses in computer-aided mammography. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2000; 54-64
10. Aldrich B, Desai M. Application of spatial grey level dependence methods to digitized mammograms. Proceedings of the IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation, 1994; 100-105
11. Chan HP. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiology: Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med. Phys. 1987; 14: 538-548
12. Dhawan AP. Enhancement of mammographic features by optimal adaptive neighborhood image processing. IEEE Trans. Medical Image 1986; M2-5: 8-15
13. Kocur CM, Rogers SK, Myers LR, Burns T, Kabrisky M, Hoffmeister JW, Bauer KW, Steppe JM. Using neural networks to select wavelet features for breast cancer diagnosis. IEEE Engineering in Med. and Bio. 1996; 15: 95-102
14. Sameti M, Ward RK, Morgan-Parkes J, Palcic B. A method for detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms using a fuzzy segmentation algorithm. IEEE Engineering in Med. and Bio. 1997; 2: 513-516
15. Chinese source
16. Chinese source
17. Verma B, Zakos J. A computer-aided diagnosis system for digital mammograms based on fuzzy-neural and feature extraction techniques. IEEE Trans. on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2001; 5: 46-54
18. Yu S, Guan L. A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. IEEE Trans, on Medical Imaging 2000; 19: 115-126
19. Swiniarskiand R, Swiniarska A. Comparison of feature extraction and selection methods in mammogram recognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2002; 980: 116-124
20. Pal NK, Pal SK. Entropic thresholding. Signal Processing 1989; 97-108
21. W.K Pratt, Digital Image Processing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2001
22. Chinese source
23. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. SMC 1973; SMC-3: 610-621
24. Chinese source
25. The Mammographic Image Analysis Society. Digital Mammography Database. http://www.wiau.man.ac.uk/ services/MIAS/MIASweb.html