Diagnosis of congenital uterine anomaly using three-dimensional ultrasound

Harefuah

Volumn 146, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 276-279

  Amsalem, Hagai ^a   Valsky, Dan V ^a   Yagel, Simcha ^a  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Three dimensional ultrasound; Uterine malformation

Indexed keywords

CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UTERUS; UTERUS DISEASE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; UTERINE DISEASES; UTERUS;

EID: 34447509737     PISSN: 00177768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J & al, Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod, 1997; 12: 2277-81.
2. Gaucherand P, Awada A, Rudigoz RC & Dargent D, Obstetrical prognosis of the septate uterus: a plea for treatment of the septum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1994; 54: 109-12.
3. Doyle MB, Magnetic resonance imaging in mullerian fusion defects. J Reprod Med, 1992; 37: 33-8.
4. Wagner BJ & Woodward PJ, Magnetic resonance evaluation of congenital uterine anomalies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 1994; 15: 4-17.
5. Chapron C, Pierre F, Querleu D & Dubuisson JB, Complications of laparoscopy in gynecology Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 2001; 29: 605-12.
6. Shokeir TA, Shalan HM & El-Shafei MM, Combined diagnostic approach of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of female infertility: Results of 612 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2004; 30: 9-14.
7. Valdes C, Malini S & Malinak LR, Ultrasound evaluation of female genital tract anomalies: a review of 64 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 19841; 149: 285-92.
8. Nicolini U, Bellotti M, Bonazzi B & al, Can ultrasound be used to screen uterine malformations? Fertil Steril, 1987; 47: 89-93.
9. Balen FG, Allen CM, Gardener JE & al, 3-dimensional reconstruction of ultrasound images of the uterine cavity. Br J Radiol, 1993; 66: 588-91.
10. Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K & al, Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1995; 5: 233-7.
11. Wu MH, Hsu CC & Huang KE, Detection of congenital mullerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound, 1997; 25: 487-92.
12. Lev-Toaff AS, Pinheiro LW, Bega G & al, Three-dimensional multiplanar sonohysterography: comparison with conventional two-dimensional sonohysterography and X-ray hysterosalpingography. J Ultrasound Med, 2001; 20: 295-306.
13. Kupesic S, Clinical implications of sonographic detection of uterine anomalies for reproductive outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001; 18: 387-400.
14. Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M & al, Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003; 21: 578-82.