Reliability of navigated knee stability examination: A cadaveric evaluation

American Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1315-1320

  Pearle, Andrew D ^a   Solomon, Daniel J ^b   Wanich, Tony ^a   Moreau Gaudry, Alexandre ^a   Granchi, Carinne C ^c   Wickiewicz, Thomas L ^a   Warren, Russell F ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c Praxim Medivision   (France)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Knee instability; Posterolateral corner; Surgical navigation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; BONE EXAMINATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE SURGERY; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CADAVER; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE JOINT; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34447505076     PISSN: 03635465     EISSN: 15523365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363546507300821     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005 ; 20 (6 Suppl 3). 132-138.
2. Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL The pivot-shift phenomenon: results and description of a modified clinical test for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med. 1988 ; 16: 571-576.
3. Balasch H., Schiller M., Friebel H., Hoffmann F. Evaluation of anterior knee joint instability with the Rolimeter. A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999 ; 7: 204-208.
4. Bathis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., Luring C., Zurakowski D., Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 ; 86: 682-687.
5. Bull AM, Amis AA The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Knee. 1998 ; 5: 141-158.
6. Bull AM, Andersen HN, Basso O., Targett J., Amis AA Incidence and mechanism of the pivot shift. An in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 ; 363: 219-231.
7. Bull AM, Earnshaw PH, Smith A., Katchburian MV, Hassan AN, Amis AA Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 ; 84: 1075-1081.
8. Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 ; 20: 29-34.
9. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R., Malcom L. Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med. 1985 ; 13: 401-407.
10. Degenhart M. Computer-navigated ACL reconstruction with the OrthoPilot. Surg Technol Int. 2004 ; 12: 245-251.
11. Dessenne V., Lavallee S., Julliard R., Orti R., Martelli S., Cinquin P. Computer-assisted knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: first clinical tests. J Image Guid Surg. 1995 ; 1: 59-64.
12. Fleute M., Lavallee S., Julliard R. Incorporating a statistically based shape model into a system for computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Med Image Anal. 1999 ; 3: 209-222.
13. Fujie H., Mabuchi K., Woo SL, Livesay GA, Arai S., Tsukamoto Y. The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng. 1993 ; 115: 211-217.
14. Galway H., Beaupre A., MacIntosh D. Pivot-shift: a clinical sign of symptomatic anterior cruciate deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 ; 54: 763-764.
15. Ganko A., Engebretsen L., Ozer H. The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000 ; 8: 36-39.
16. Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 ; 69: 233-242.
17. Haaker RG, Stockheim M., Kamp M., Proff G., Breitenfelder J., Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 ; 433: 152-159.
18. Hufner T., Geerling J., Kfuri M Jr, et al. Computer-assisted pelvic surgery: registration based on a modified external fixator. Comput Aided Surg. 2003 ; 8: 192-197.
19. Insall J., Scott W. Surgery of the Knee. 3 rd edition. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone ; 2001.
20. International Knee Documentation Committee. The IKDC knee ligament standard evaluation form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996 ; 4 :Appendix.
21. Khadem R., Yeh CC, Sadeghi-Tehrani M., et al. Comparative tracking error analysis of 5 different optical tracking systems. Comput Aided Surg. 2000 ; 5: 98-107.
22. Kim SJ, Kim HK Reliability of the anterior drawer test, the pivot-shift test, and the Lachman test. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 ; 317: 237-242.
23. Kim SJ, Macdonald M., Hernandez J., Wixson RL Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty. 2005 ; 20 (6 Suppl 3). 123-131.
24. Klos TV, Habets RJ, Banks AZ, Banks SA, Devilee RJ, Cook FF Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 ; 354: 65-69.
25. Langlotz F. Potential pitfalls of computer-aided orthopedic surgery. Injury. 2004 ; 35 (Suppl 1). S-A17-23.
26. Lerat JL, Moyen BL, Cladiere F., Besse JL, Abidi H. Knee instability after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament. Quantification of the Lachman test. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 ; 82: 42-47.
27. Li Q., Zamorano L., Jiang Z., et al. Effect of optical digitizer selection on the application accuracy of a surgical localization system: a quantitative comparison between the OPTOTRAK and flashpoint tracking systems. Comput Aided Surg. 1999 ; 4: 314-321.
28. Livesay GA, Fujie H., Kashiwaguchi S., Morrow DA, Fu FH, Woo SL Determination of the in situ forces and force distribution within the human anterior cruciate ligament. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995 ; 23: 467-474.
29. Malanga GA, Andrus S., Nadler SF, McLean J. Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 ; 84: 592-603.
30. Moody JE, Nikou C., Picard F., et al. Computer-integrated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction system. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 ; 84 (Suppl 2). 99-101.
31. Muller-Alsbach UW, Staubli AE Computer-aided ACL reconstruction. Injury. 2004 ; 35 (Suppl 1). S-A65-7.
32. Picard F., DiGioia AM, Moody J., et al. Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Comput Aided Surg. 2001 ; 6: 279-289.
33. Rangger C., Daniel DM, Stone ML, Kaufman K. Diagnosis of an ACL disruption with KT-1000 arthrometer measurements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993 ; 1: 60-66.
34. Rudy TW, Livesay GA, Woo SL, Fu FH A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J Biomech. 1996 ; 29: 1357-1360.
35. Schmerber S., Chassat F. Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology. Comput Aided Surg. 2001 ; 6: 1-13.
36. Schuster AJ, McNicholas MJ, Wachtl SW, McGurty DW, Jakob RP A new mechanical testing device for measuring anteroposterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2004 ; 32: 1731-1735.
37. Veltri DM, Deng XH, Torzilli PA, Warren RF, Maynard MJ The role of the cruciate and posterolateral ligaments in stability of the knee. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 1995 ; 23: 436-443.
38. Veltri DM, Warren RF Anatomy, biomechanics, and physical findings in posterolateral knee instability. Clin Sports Med. 1994 ; 13: 599-614.
39. Veltri DM, Warren RF Posterolateral instability of the knee. Instr Course Lect. 1995 ; 44: 441-453.