Mate change reduces the reproductive rate of males in a monogamous pipefish corythoichthys haematopterus: The benefit of long-term pair bonding

Ethology

Volumn 113, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 764-771

  Sogabe, Atsushi ^a   Matsumoto, Koji ^a   Yanagisawa, Yasunobu ^a  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FINFISH; MATE CHOICE; MONOGAMY; PARENTAL CARE; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SPAWNING;

CORYTHOICHTHYS HAEMATOPTERUS; SYNGNATHIDAE; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 34447504693     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01370.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Acharya, L. McNeil, J. N. 1998 : Predation risk and mating behavior: the responses of moths to bat-like ultrasound. Behav. Ecol. 9, 552 558.
2. Ahnesjö, I. 1992a : Consequences of male brood care; weight and number of newborn in a sex-role reversed pipefish. Func. Ecol. 6, 274 281.
3. Ahnesjö, I. 1992b : Fewer newborn result in superior juveniles in the paternally brooding pipefish Syngnathus typhle L. J. Fish. Biol. 41B, 53 63.
4. Barlow, G. W. 1984 : Patterns of monogamy among teleost fishes. Arch. Fischwiss. 35, 75 123.
5. Barlow, G. W. 1986 : A comparison of monogamy among freshwater and coral-reef fishes. In : Indo-Pacific Fish Biology: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Indo-Pacific Fishes (Uyeno, T., Arai, R., Taniuchi, T. Matsuura, K., eds). Ichthyological Society of Japan, Tokyo, pp. 767 775.
6. Berglund, A. 1993 : Risky sex: male pipefishes mate at random in the presence of a predator. Anim. Behav. 46, 169 175.
7. Berglund, A., Rosenqvist, G. Svensson, I. 1986a : Reversed sex roles and parental energy investment in zygotes of two pipefish (Syngnathidae) species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 29, 209 215.
8. Berglund, A., Rosenqvist, G. Svensson, I. 1986b : Mate choice, fecundity and sexual dimorphism in two pipefish species (Syngnathidae). Behav. Ecol. Evol. 19, 301 307.
9. Brotherton, P. N. M. Rhodes, A. 1996 : Monogamy without biparental care in a dwarf antelope. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 263, 23 29.
10. DeWoody, J. A., Fletcher, D. E., Wilkins, S. D., Nelson, W. S. Avise, J. C. 2000 : Genetic monogamy and biparental care in an externally fertilizing fish, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267, 2431 2437.
11. Emlen, S. T. Oring, L. W. 1977 : Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215 223.
12. Endler, J. A. 1987 : Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim. Behav. 35, 1376 1385.
13. Foster, S. J. Vincent, A. C. J. 2004 : Life history and ecology of seahorses: implications for conservation and management. J. Fish. Biol. 65, 1 61.
14. Fuller, R. Berglund, A. (1996) Behavioral responses of a sex role reversed pipefish to a gradient of perceived predation risk. Behav. Ecol. 7, 69 75.
15. Ghiselin, M. T. 1969 : The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 44, 189 208.
16. Gronell, A. M. 1984 : Courtship, spawning and social organization of the pipefish, Corythoichthys intestinalis (Pisces: Syngnathidae) with notes on two congeneric species. Z. Tierpsychol. 65, 1 24.
17. Harding, J. A., Almany, G. R., Houck, L. D. Hixon, M. A. 2003 : Experimental analysis of monogamy in the Caribbean cleaner goby, Gobiosoma evelynae. Anim. Behav. 65, 865 874.
18. Haresign, T. W. Shumway, S. E. 1981 : Permeability of the marsupium of the pipefish Syngnathus fuscus to [14C]-alpha amino isobutyric acid. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 69A, 603 604.
19. Hourigan, T. F. 1989 : Environmental determinants of butterflyfish social systems. Env. Biol. Fish. 25, 61 78.
20. Johnson, J. B. Basolo, A. L. 2003 : Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail. Behav. Ecol. 14, 619 625.
21. Jones, A. G. Avise, J. C. 2001 : Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insight from microsatellite-based studies of maternity. J. Hered. 92, 150 158.
22. Kleiman, D. 1977 : Monogamy in mammals. Q. Rev. Biol. 52, 39 69.
23. Kokita, T. 2002 : The role of female behavior in maintaining monogamy of a coral-reef filefish. Ethology 108, 157 168.
24. Kokita, T. Nakazono, A. 1998 : Plasticity in the mating system of the longnose filefish, Oxymonacanthus longirostris, in relation to mate availability. J. Ethol. 16, 81 89.
25. Kuwamura, T. 1996 : The evolution of parental care and mating systems among Tanganyikan cichlids. In : Fish Communities in Lake Tanganyika (Kawanabe, H., Hori, M. Nagoshi, M., eds). Kyoto Univ. Press, Kyoto, pp. 57 86.
26. Kuwamura, T., Yogo, Y. Nakashima, Y. 1993 : Size-assortative monogamy and paternal egg care in a coral goby Paragobiodon echinocephalus. Ethology 95, 65 75.
27. Kvarnemo, C., Moore, G. I., Jones, A. G., Nelson, W. S. Avise, J. C. 2000 : Monogamous pair bonds and mate switching in the Western Australian seahorse Hippocampus subelongatus. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 882 888.
28. Matsumoto, K. 2003 : Mating system and sex-role in the pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus. PhD Thesis, Ehime University, Ehime, Japan.
29. Matsumoto, K. Yanagisawa, Y. 2001 : Monogamy and sex role reversal in pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus. Anim. Behav. 61, 163 170.
30. Morley, J. I. Balshine, S. 2002 : Faithful fish: territory and mate defence favour monogamy in an African cichlid fish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 326 331.
31. Quast, W. D. Howe, N. R. 1980 : The osmotic role of the brood pouch in the pipefish Syngnathus scovelli. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 67A, 675 678.
32. Reavis, R. H. Barlow, G. W. 1998 : Why is the coral-reef fish Valenciennea strigata (Gobiidae) monogamous? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43, 229 237.
33. Robertson, D. R. 1973 : Field observation on the reproductive behaviour of a pomacentrid fish, Acanthochromis polyacanthus. Z. Tierpsychol. 32, 319 324.
34. Sogabe, A. Yanagisawa, Y. (in press The function of daily greetings in a monogamous pipe fish Corythoichthys haematopterus. J. Fish. Biol., in press.
35. Takegaki, T. 2000 : Monogamous mating system and spawning cycle in the gobiid fish, Amblygobius phalaena (Gobiidae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 59, 61 67.
36. Vincent, A. C. J. Sadler, L. M. 1995 : Faithful pair bonds in wild seahorses, Hippocampus whitei. Anim. Behav. 50, 1557 1569.
37. Vincent, A. C. J., Ahnesjö, I., Berglund, A. Rosenqvist, G. 1992 : Pipefishes and seahorses: are they all sex role reversed Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 237 241.
38. Vincent, A. C. J., Dale Marsden, A., Evans, K. L. Sadler, L. M. 2004 : Temporal and spatial opportunities for polygamy in a monogamous seahorse, Hippocampus whitei. Behaviour 141, 141 156.
39. Whiteman, E. A. Côté, I. M. 2003 : Social monogamy in the cleaning goby Elacatinus evelynae: ecological constraints or net benefit Anim. Behav. 66, 281 291.
40. Whiteman, E. A. Côté, I. M. 2004 : Monogamy in marine fishes. Biol. Rev. 79, 351 375.
41. Wilson, A. B., Ahnesjö, I., Vincent, A. C. J. Meyer, A. 2003 : The dynamics of male brooding, mating patterns, and sex roles in pipefishes and seahorses (family Syngnathidae). Evolution 57, 1374 1386.
42. Wisenden, B. D. 1994 : Factors affecting mate desertion by males in free-ranging convict cichlids (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum). Behav. Ecol. 5, 439 447.
43. Wittenberger, J. F. Tilson, R. L. 1980 : The evolution of monogamy: hypotheses and evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 197 232.