Build it and they will come? Mandating collaboration in public lands planning and management

Natural Resources Journal

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 841-858

  Cheng, Antony S ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING;

EID: 34447499846     PISSN: 00280739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. W. GOVERNORS' ASS'N ET AL., A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH FOR REDUCING WILDLAND FIRE RISKS TO COMMUNITIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT: 10-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (2002).
2. 36 CFR § 219.
3. BARBARA GRAY, COLLABORATING: FINDING COMMON GROUND FOR MULTIPARTY PROBLEMS (1989).
4. Id.
5. MANCUR OLSON, THE LOGIC OF COLLECTIVE ACTION: PUBLIC GOODS AND THE THEORY OF GROUPS (2nd ed. 1971).
6. MAKING SENSE OF INTRACTABLE ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICTS: CONCEPTS AND CASES (Roy J. Lewicki et al. eds., 2003).
7. FOREST COMMUNITIES, COMMUNITY FORESTS: STRUGGLES AND SUCCESSES IN REBUILDING COMMUNITIES AND FORESTS (Jonathan Kusel & Elisa Adler eds., 2003).
8. Id.
9. Antony S. Cheng et al., "Place" as an Integrating Concept in Natural Resource Politics: Propositions for a Social Science Research Agenda, 16 SOC'Y & NAT. RESOURCES87 (2003);
10. JULIA M. WONDOLLECK & STEVEN L. YAFFEE, MAKING COLLABORATION WORK: LESSONS FROM INNOVATION IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (2000).
11. S.E. Daniels & A.S. Cheng, Collaborative Resource Management: Discourse-Based Approaches and the Evolution of TechnoReg, in SOCIETY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE (M.J. Manfredo et al. eds., 2004).
12. WONDOLLECK & YAFFEE, supra note 9.
13. Collaboration Stories, Red Lodge Clearinghouse (2006), available at http://www.redlodgeclearinghouse.org/ (last visited Aug. 27, 2006).
14. George C. Coggins, Regulating Federal Natural Resources: A Summary Case Against Devolved Collaboration, 25 ECOLOGY L.Q. 602 (1999);
15. George C. Coggins, Of Californicators, Quislings and Crazies: Some Perils of Devolved Collaboration, in ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE: EXPLORATIONS IN COLLABORATIVE CONSERVATION AND THE AMERICAN WEST 27 (Philip D. Brick et al. eds., 2001);
16. Michael McCloskey, The Skeptic: Collaboration Has Its Limits, 28 HIGH COUNTRY NEWS, May 13, 1996, at 7;
17. Michael McCloskey, Local Communities and the Management of Public Forests, 25 ECOLOGY L.Q. 624 (1999).
18. S. Singleton, Collaborative Environmental Planning in the American West: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, 11 ENVTL. POL. 54 (2002).
19. STEVEN E. DANIELS & GREGG B. WALKER, WORKING THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICT: THE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING APPROACH (2001).
20. W. GOVERNORS' ASS'N ET AL., supra note 1.
21. 16 U.S.C. § 2104.
22. 16 U.S.C. § 6501.
23. 36 C.F.R. § 219.
24. SAM BURNS & ANTONY S. CHENG, THE UTILIZATION OF COLLABORATTVE PROCESSES IN FOREST PLANNING (Durango, CO: Office of Community Services, Fort Lewis College, 2005).
25. Terry C. Daniel, Social Science of Wildfire Risk Management: Individual Level of Analysis, in HUMANS, FIRE, AND FORESTS: SOCIAL SCIENCE APPLIED TO FIRE MANAGEMENT 9 (Workshop Summary, Jan. 28-31, 2003,
26. Hanna J. Cortner et al. eds., Flagstaff, AZ: Ecological Restoration Inst., Northern Arizona Univ., 2003);
27. SAM BURNS ET AL., PEOPLE AND FIRE IN WESTERN COLORADO: FOCUS GROUP ATTITUDES, BELIEFS, OPINIONS, AND DESIRES REGARDING WILDFIRE IN THE WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE OF COLORADO'S WESTERN SLOPE (working report prepared for the USDI Bureau of Land Management, Durango, CO: Office of Community Services, Fort Lewis College, 2003).
28. Hanna J. Cortner & Margaret A. Shannon, Embedding Public Participation in Its Political Context, 91 J. FORESTRY 14 (1993).
29. See, e.g., LISA GREGORY, FOLLOWING THE MONEY: NATIONAL FIRE PLAN FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION (The Wilderness Soc'y 2005).
30. HERBERT KAUFMAN, THE FOREST RANGER: A STUDY IN ADMINISTRATIVE BEHAVIOR (1960).
31. PETER M. SENGE, THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE: THE ART AND PRACTICE OF THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION (1990).
32. Id. at 3.
33. GARY LARSEN ET AL., SYNTHESIS OF THE CRITIQUE OF LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING (U.S. Dep't of Agric., Forest Serv., FS-452, 1990).
34. BURNS & CHENG, supra note 20.
35. 16 U.S.C. 1600.