A mixture model approach to the tests of concordance and discordance between two large-scale experiments with two-sample groups

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1243-1250

  Lai, Yinglei ^a   Adam, Bao Ling ^b   Podolsky, Robert ^b   She, Jin Xiong ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DOWN REGULATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; OVARY CANCER; PARAMETRIC TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSTATE CANCER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; SURFACE ENHANCED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY; UPREGULATION;

EID: 34447345702     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm103     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adam,B-L. et al. (2002) Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. Cancer Res., 62, 3609-3614.
2. Baggerly,K.A. et al. (2004) Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: Comparing datasets from different experiments. Bioinformatics, 20, 777-785.
3. Cahan,P. et al. (2005) List of lists-annotated (LOLA): A database for annotation and comparison of published microarray gene lists. Gene, 360, 78-82.
4. Choi,J.K. et al. (2003) Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation. Bioinformatics, 19 (Suppl. 1) i84-i90.
5. Dudoit,S. et al. (2003) Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Stat. Sci., 18, 71-103.
6. Ein-Dor,L. et al. (2006) Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 5923-5928.
7. Ghosh,D. and Chinnaiyan,A.M. (2002) Mixture modelling of gene expression data from microarray experiments. Bioinformatics, 18, 275-286.
8. Glunde,K. et al. (2004) Molecular causes of the aberrant choline phospholipid metabolism in breast cancer. Cancer Res., 64, 4270-4276.
9. Golub,T.R. et al. (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286, 531-537.
10. McLachlan,G.J. (1987) On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test statistic for the number of components in a normal mixture. Appl. Stat., 36, 318-324.
11. McLachlan,G.J. and Krishnan, T. (1997) The EM Algorithm and Extensions. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. McLachlan,G.J. et al. (2006) A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays. Bioinformatics, 22, 1608-1615.
13. Miron,M. et al. (2006) A methodology for global validation of microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 333.
14. Ng,S.K. et al. (2006) A Mixture model with random-effects components for clustering correlated gene-expression profiles. Bioinformatics, 22, 1745-1752.
15. Pan,W. et al. (2002) Model-based cluster analysis of microarray gene-expression data. Genome Biol., 3, research 0009.1-0009.8.
16. Petricoin,E.F. III et al. (2002) Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet, 359, 572-577.
17. Purohit,S. et al. (2006) Assessing the utility of SELDI-TOF and model averaging for serum proteomic biomarker discovery. Proteomics 6, 6405-6415.
18. Ressom,H.W. et al. (2005) Analysis of mass spectral serum profiles for biomarker selection. Bioinformatics, 21, 4039-4045.
19. Roesch-Ely,M. et al. (2007) Proteomic analysis reveals successive aberrations in protein expression from healthy mucosa to invasive head and neck cancer. Oncogene, 26, 54-64.
20. Ward,D.G. et al. (2006) Identification of serum biomarkers for colon cancer by proteomic analysis. Br. J. Cancer, 94, 1898-1905.
21. Xu,L. et al. (2005) Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data. Bioinformatics, 21, 3905-3911.