Monophyly and phylogenetic relationships in Lymania (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on morphology and chloroplast DNA sequences

Systematic Botany

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 264-270

  De Sousa, Leandro De Oliveira Furtado ^a   Wendt, Tânia ^a   Brown, Gregory K ^b,c   Tuthill, Dorothy E ^b,c   Evans, Timothy M ^d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^c MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS   (United States)

^d HOPE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brazil; Cladistics; Combined analysis; matK; psbA trnH; trnL trnF

Indexed keywords

AECHMEA; BROMELIACEAE; LYMANIA;

EID: 34447342558     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364407781179707     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. BARFUSS, M. H. J., R. SAMUEL, W. TILL, and T. F. STUESSY. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships in subfamily Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae) based on DNA sequence data from seven plastid regions. American Journal of Botany 92: 337-351.
2. BROWN, G. K. and E. M. C. LEME. 2005. The re-establishment of Andrea (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae), a monotypic genus from Southeastern Brazil threatened with extinction. Taxon 54: 63-70.
3. _ and R. G. TERRY. 1992. Petal appendages in Bromeliaceae. American Journal of Botany 79: 1051-1071.
4. CHASE, M. W., M. F. FAY, and V. SAVOLAINEN. 2000. Higher-level classification in the Angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data. Taxon 49: 685-704.
5. CLARK, W. D., B. S. GAUT, M. R. DUVALL, and M. T. CLEGG. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of the Bromeliiflorae - Commeliniflorae - Zingiberiflorae complex of monocots based on rbcL sequence comparisons. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 987-998.
6. CRAYN, D. M., R. G. TERRY, J. A. C. SMITH, and K. WINTER. 2000. Molecular systematic investigations in Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae) as a basis for understanding the evolution of crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). Pp. 569-579 in Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, eds. K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
7. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
8. DE QUEIROZ, A. L., M. J. DONOGHUE, and J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 657-681.
9. DE SOUSA, L. O. F. 2004. Revisão taxonômica e filogenia do gênero Lymania Read (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae). M.S. thesis. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
10. DONOGHUE, M. J. and M. J. SANDERSON. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Pp. 340-368 in Molecular systematics of plants, eds. P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. New York: Chapman and Hall.
11. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
12. DUVALL, M. R., M. T. CLEGG, M. W. CHASE, W. D. CLARK, W. J. KRESS, H. G. HILLS, L. E. EGUIARTE, J. F. SMITH, B. S. GAUT, E. A. ZIMMER, and G. H. LEARN. 1993. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 607-619.
13. DUVAL, M. F., G. S. C. BUSO, F. R. FERREIRA, J. L. NOYER, G. COPPENS D'EECKENBRUGGE, P. HAMON, and M. E. FERREIRA. 2003. Relationships in Ananas and other related genera using chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Genome 46: 990-1004.
14. FARIA, A. P. G., T. WENDT, and G. K. BROWN. 2004. Cladistic relationships of Aechmea (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) and allied genera. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 91: 303-319.
15. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
16. GAUT, B. S., S. V. MUSE, W. D. CLARK, and M. T. CLEGG. 1992. Relative rates of nucleotide substitution at the rbcL locus of monocotyledonous plants. Journal of Molecular Evolution 35: 292-303.
17. GILMARTIN, A. J. and G. K. BROWN. 1986. Cladistic tests of hypotheses concerning evolution of xerophytes and mesophytes within Tillandsia subgenus Phytarrhiza (Bromeliaceae). American Journal of Botany 73: 387-397.
18. _ and _. 1987. Bromeliales, related monocots, and resolution of relationships among Bromeliaceae subfamilies. Systematic Botany 12: 493-500.
19. GIVNISH, T. J., T. M. EVANS, J. C. PIRES, and K. J. SYTSMA. 1999. Polyphyly and convergent morphological evolution in Commelinales and Commelinidae: evidence from rbcL sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 360-385.
20. _, K. C. MILLAM, T. M. EVANS, J. C. HALL, J. C. PIRES, P. E. BERRY, and K. J. SYTSMA. 2004. Ancient vicariance or recent long-distance dispersal? Inferences about phylogeny and south American-African disjunctions in Rapateaceae and Bromeliaceae based on ndhF sequence data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165(4 Suppl.): S35-S54.
21. GRANT, J. R. 1993. True tillandsias misplaced in Vriesea (Bromeliaceae: Tillandsioideae). Phytologia 75: 170-175.
22. HORRES, R., G. ZIZKA, G. KAHL, and K. WEISING. 2000. Molecular phylogenetics of Bromeliaceae: evidence from trnL(UAA) intron sequences of chloroplast genome. Plant Biology 2: 306-315.
23. HUELSENBECK, J. P., J. J. BULL, and C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 152-158.
24. _ and F. RONQUIST. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
25. JOHNSON, L. A. and D. E. SOLTIS. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 149-175.
26. LEME, E. M. C. 1987. Novas Bromeliáceas Nativas do Brasil. Bradea 4: 392-404.
27. _. 2006. A new Lymania species from Bahia, Brazil. Journal of the Bromeliad Society 56: 42-45.
28. _ and R. C. FORZZA. 2001. A new Lymania species from Bahia, Brazil. Journal of the Bromeliad Society 51: 195-198.
29. MADDISON, D. R. and W. P. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade 4: Analyses of Phylogeny and Character evolution. Version 4.0. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
30. MEZ, C. 1934-1935. Bromeliaceae. Pp. 1-667 in Das Pflanzenreich IV.32, ed. A. Engler. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
31. NANDI, O. I., M. W. CHASE, and P. K. ENDRESS. 1998. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and nonmolecular data sets. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 137-212.
32. POSADA, D. and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
33. RANKER, T. A., D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, and A. J. GILMARTIN. 1990. Subfamilial phylogenetic relationships of the Bromeliaceae: evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Systematic Botany 15: 425-434.
34. RONQUIST, F. and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
35. READ, R. W. 1984. The "Evolution" of a new genus Lymania gen. nov. Journal of the Bromeliad Society 34: 199-201, 212-216.
36. SANG, T., D. J. CRAWFORD, and T. F. STUESSY. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1120-1136.
37. SCOTLAND, R. W., R. G. OLMSTEAD, and J. R. BENNETT. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology. Systematic Biology 52: 539-548.
38. SMITH, J. F., K. S. SYTSMA, J. S. SHOEMAKER, and R. L. SMITH. 1991. A qualitative comparison of total cellular DNA extraction protocols. Phytochemical Bulletin 23: 2-9.
39. SMITH, L. B. and R. J. DOWNS. 1974. Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae). Pp. 1-658 in Flora Neotropica. Mon. 14, part 1. New York: Hafner Press.
40. _ and _. 1977. Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae). Pp. 663-1492 in Flora Neotropica. Mon. 14, part 2. New York: Hafner Press.
41. _ and _. 1979. Bromelioideae (Bromeliaceae). Pp. 1493-2142 in Flora Neotropica. Mon. 14. part 3. New York: The New York Botanical Garden.
42. _ and M. A. SPENCER. 1992. Reduction of Streptocalyx (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae). Phytologia 72: 96-98.
43. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2003. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
44. SYTSMA, K. J. and J. C. PIRES. 2001. Plant systematics in the next 50 years: Re-mapping the new frontier. Taxon 50: 713-732.
45. TERRY, G. R., G. K. BROWN, and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1997a. Examination of subfamilial phylogeny in Bromeliaceae using comparative sequencing of the plastid locus ndhF. American Journal of Botany 84: 664-670.
46. _, and _. 1997b. Phylogenetic relationships in subfamily Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae) using ndhF sequences. Systematic Botany 22: 333-345.
47. VARADARAJAN, G. S. and A. J. GILMARTIN. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships of groups of genera within the subfamily Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae). Systematic Botany 13: 283-293.