Sacral orientation revisited

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 15, 2007, Pages

  Peleg, Smadar ^a   Dar, Gali ^a,b   Steinberg, Nili ^a   Peled, Nathan ^c   Hershkovitz, Israel ^a,d   Masharawi, Youssef ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^c CARMEL MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^d CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Pelvis; Posture; Sacrum

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIGITAL IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBIS SYMPHYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SACRUM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILIUM; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ISCHIUM; MALE; PELVIS; PUBIC BONE; PUBIC SYMPHYSIS; REFERENCE VALUES; SACROILIAC JOINT; SACRUM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34447324098     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074d676     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, et al. Towards standards for posture-postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 1985;10:83-7.
2. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P. A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 1992;20:451-62.
3. Ferguson AB. The clinical and roentgenographic interpretation of lumbosacral anomalies. Radiology 1934;22:548-58.
4. Itoi E. Roentgenographic analysis of posture in spinal osteoporotics. Spine 1991;16:750-6.
5. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, et al. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 1998;23:1750-67.
6. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size: a prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 1994;19:1611-8.
7. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. The importance of spinopelvic balance in L5-S1 developmental spondylolisthesis. Spine 2005;30(suppl):27-34.
8. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for evaluation of kyphosis and scoliosis. Spine 1982;7:335-42.
9. Von Lackum HL. The lumbosacral region. JAMA 1924;82:1109-14.
10. Rajnics P, Pomero V, Templier A, et al. Computer-assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. J Spinal Disord Tech 2001;14:135-42.
11. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998;7:99-103.
12. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 2002;11:80-7.
13. Mitchell GAG. The lumbosacral junction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1934;16:233-54.
14. Amonoo-Kuofi HS. Changes in the lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination and the curvature of the lumbar spine during aging. Acta Anat 1992;145:373.
15. Meschan I, Farrer-Meschan RMF. Important aspects in the roentgen study of the normal lumbosacral spine. Radiology 1958;70:637-48.
16. Macintosh JE, Bogduk N, Munro RR. The morphology of the human lumbar multifidus. Clin Biomech 1986;1:196-204.
17. Macintosh JE, Bogduk N. The biomechanics of the human lumbar multifidus. Clin Biomech 1986;1:205-13.
18. Macintosh JE, Bogduk N. The attachments of the lumbar erector spinae. Spine 1991;16:783-92.
19. Roaf R. Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1960;42:40-59.
20. Wiles PH. Postural deformities of the anteroposterior curves of the spine. Lancet 1937;1:911-9.
21. Jackson RP, Phipps T, Hales C, et al. Pelvic lordosis and alignment in spondylolisthesis. Spine 2003;28:151-60.
22. Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H, et al. The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants and spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 2002;11:119-25.
23. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, et al. The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:24-30.
24. Hanson, DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, et al. Correlation of pelvic incidence with low- and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2002;27:2026-9.
25. Mays S. Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in medieval skeletal population. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;131:352-62.
26. Jackson RP, Hales C. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine 2000;25:2808-15.
27. Whitesides TE, Horton WC, Hutton WC, et al. Spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2005;30(suppl):12-21.
28. Howells WW, Hotelling H. Measurements and correlations on pelves of Indians of the southwest. Am J Phys Anthropol 1936;21:91-106.
29. Tague RG. Sexual dimorphism in the human bony pelvis, with a consideration of the Neandertal pelvis from the Kebara Cave, Israel. Am J Phys Anthropol 1992;88:1-21.
30. Drake RL, Vogle W, Mitchell AWM. Pelvis and perineum. In: Drake RL, Vogle W, Mitchell AWM, eds. Gray's Anatomy for Students. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005:373-4.
31. Moore KL. The perineum and pelvis. In: Gardner JN, ed. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1985:333-40.