Improved technical success and midterm patency with subintimal angioplasty compared to intraluminal angioplasty in long femoropopliteal occlusions

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 374-381

  Ko, Young Guk ^a   Kim, Jung Sun ^a   Choi, Dong Hoon ^a   Jang, Yangsoo ^a   Shim, Won Heum ^a  

^a Yonsei University Health System   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Balloon angioplasty; Femoropopliteal segment; Occlusion; Peripheral occlusive disease; Stent; Subintimal angioplasty; Superficial femoral artery

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CILOSTAZOL; CLOPIDOGREL; HEPARIN; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; NITINOL; WARFARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEVICE; EMBOLISM; FEMALE; FEMOROPOPLITEAL OBSTRUCTION; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRALUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; SELF EXPANDING NITINOL STENT; STENT; SUBINTIMAL ANGIOPLASTY; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY; TREATMENT FAILURE;

AGED; ALLOYS; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUNICA INTIMA; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 34447321325     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/06-1983.1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bolia A, Brennan J, Bell PR. Recanalisation of femoropopliteal occlusions: improving success rate by subintimal recanalisation. Clin Radiol. 1989,40:325.
2. Bolia A, Miles KA, Brennan J, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of occlusions of the femoral and popliteal arteries by subintimal dissection. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1990;13:357-363.
3. London NJ, Srinivasan R, Naylor AR, et al. Subintimal angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery occlusions: the long-term results. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1994;8:148-155.
4. McCarthy RJ, Neary W, Roobottom C, et al. Short-term results of femoropopliteal subintimal angioplasty. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1361-1365.
5. Shaw MB, DeNunzio M, Hinwood D, et al. The results of subintimal angioplasty in a district general hospital. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24:524-527.
6. Laxdal E, Jenssen GL, Pedersen G, et al. Subintimal angioplasty as a treatment of femoropopliteal artery occlusions. Eur J Endovasc Surg. 2003;25:578-582.
7. Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Veith FJ, et al. Does subintimal angioplasty have a role in the treatment of severe lower extremity ischemia? J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:386-391.
8. Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Yegin A, et al. Subintimal angioplasty of long superficial femoral artery occlusions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14: 997-1010.
9. Desgranges P, Boufi M, Lapeyre M, et al. Subintimal angioplasty: feasible and durable. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:138-141.
10. Flørenes T, Bay D, Sandbaek G, et al. Subintimal angioplasty in the treatment of patients with intermittent claudication: long term results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28: 645-650.
11. Loftus IM, Hayes PD, Bell PR. Subintimal angioplasty in lower limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;45:217-229.
12. Lazaris AM, Tsiamis AC, Fishwick G, et al. Clinical outcome of primary infrainguinal subintimal angioplasty in diabetic patients with critical lower limb ischemia. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:447-453.
13. Smith BM, Stechman M, Gibson M, et al. Subintimal angioplasty for superficial femoral artery occlusion: poor patency in critical ischaemia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87: 361-365.
14. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Concensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:S1-S296.
15. Hunink MG, Wong JB, Donaldson MC, et al. Revascularization for femoropopliteal disease: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA. 1995;274:165-171.
16. Gray BH, Olin JW. Limitations of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting for femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease. Semin Vasc Surg. 1997;10:8-16.
17. Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Veith FJ, et al. Fate of collateral vessels following subintimal angioplasty. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:269-73.
18. Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ, Ohki T. The value of subintimal angioplasty in the management of critical lower extremity ischemia: failure is not always associated with a rethreatened limb. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;45:231-237.
19. Balas P, Pangratis N, Ioannou N, et al. Open subintimal angioplasty of the superficial femoral and distal arteries. J Endovasc Ther. 2000;7:68-71.
20. Schlager O, Dick P, Sabeti S, et al. Long-segment SFA stenting-the dark sides: in-stent restenosis, clinical deterioration, and stent fractures. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:676-684.
21. Scheinert D, Scheinert S, Sax J, et al. Prevalence and clinical impact of stent fractures after femoropopliteal stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:312-315.