Violations of information structure: An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions

Brain and Language

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 228-242

  Cowles, H W ^a   Kluender, Robert ^b   Kutas, Marta ^b   Polinsky, Maria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clefts; ERPs; Focus; Information structure; Late positivity; N400

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 34447317265     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bornkessel I., McElree B., Schlesewsky M., and Friederici A. Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking. Journal of Memory and Language 51 (2004) 495-522
2. Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M., and Friederici A. Contextual information modulated initial processes of syntactic integration: the role of inter- versus intrasentential predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29 (2003) 871-882
3. Brown C., and Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 (1993) 34-44
4. DeLong K., Urbach T., and Kutas M. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1117-1121
5. Erteschik-Shir N. The dynamics of focus structure (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
6. Federmeier K., and Kutas M. A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 41 (1999) 469-495
7. Fiebach C.J., Schlesewsky M., and Friederici A.D. Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language 74 (2002) 250-272
8. Frazier L., and Clifton Jr. C. Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (1989) 93-126
9. Frisch S., and Schlesewsky M. The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. NeuroReport 12 15 (2001) 3391-3394
10. Frisch S., and Schlesewsky M. The resolution of case conflicts from neurophysiological perspective. Cognitive Brain Research 25 (2005) 484-498
11. Hagoort P., Brown C.M., and Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 (1993) 439-483
12. Hagoort P., Hald L., Bastiaansen M., and Petersson K.M. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304 (2004) 438-441
13. Hoeks J.C.J., Stowe L.A., and Doedens G. Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research 19 (2004) 59-73
14. Hopf J.-M., Bayer J., Bader M., and Meng M. Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 2 (1998) 264-280
15. Hruska, C., Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Steube, A. (2000). ERP effects of sentence accents and violations of the information structure. In Poster presented at the 13th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, San Diego, CA.
16. Huynh H., and Feldt L.S. Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom for sample data in the randomized block and split plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics 1 (1976) 69-82
17. Kaan E., Harris A., Gibson E., and Holcomb P. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes 15 (2000) 159-201
18. Kim A., and Osterhout L. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 52 (2005) 205-222
19. Kiss K. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74 2 (1998) 245-273
20. Kluender R., and Kutas M. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 (1993) 573-633
21. Kolk H.H.J., Chwilla D.J., van Herten M., and Oor P.J.W. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language 85 (2003) 1-36
22. Kucera H., and Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present-day American English (1967), Brown University Press, Providence
23. Kuperberg G.R., Sitnikova T., Caplan D., and Holcomb P.J. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research 17 (2003) 117-129
24. Kutas M., and Federmeier K. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 463-470
25. Kutas M., and Hillyard S.A. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology 11 (1980) 99-116
26. Kutas M., and Hillyard S.A. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307 (1984) 161-163
27. Kutas M., and Van Petten C. Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. In: Gernsbacher M.A. (Ed). Handbook of Psycholinguistics (1994), Academic Press 83-143
28. Lambrecht K. Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents (1994), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
29. Lambrecht K. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39 (2001) 463-516
30. Lambrecht, K. & Polinsky, M. (1997). Typological variation in sentence-focus constructions. In Kora Singer et al. (Eds). Proceedings of the thirty-third annual meeting of the Chicago linguistic society. Papers from the panels, Chicago, IL (pp. 189-206).
31. McKinnon R., and Osterhout L. Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 5 (1996) 495-523
32. Münte T.F., Heinze H.-J., Matzke M., Wieringa B.M., and Johannes S. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 217-226
33. Neville H.J., Mills D.L., and Lawson D. Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex 2 (1992) 244-258
34. Neville H.J., Nicol J.L., Barss A., Forster K.I., and Garrett M.F. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3 (1991) 151-165
35. Nieuwenhuis S., Aston-Jones G., and Cohen J.D. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin 131 (2005) 510-532
36. Osterhout L., and Holcomb P. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language. 31 (1992) 785-806
37. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.
38. Rochemont M. Focus in Generative Grammar (1986), John Benjamins, Philadelphia
39. Rochemont M. Phonological focus and structural focus. In: Culicover P., and McNally L. (Eds). Syntax and semantics 29: The limits of syntax (1998), Academic Press, San Diego 337-364
40. Ross J.R. Infinite Syntax! (1986), Ablex, Norwood
41. Selkirk E. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In: Goldsmith J. (Ed). The Handbook of Phonological Theory (1996), Blackwell Press, Cambridge, MA 550-569
42. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., and John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150 (1965) 1187-1188
43. van Berkum J., Hagoort P., and Brown C. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11 6 (1999) 657-671
44. van Berkum J., Zwitserlood P., Hagoort P., and Brown C. When and how do listeners related a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research 17 (2003) 701-718
45. van Herten M., Kolk H.H.J., and Chwilla D.J. An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research 22 (2005) 241-255
46. Van Petten C., and Kutas M. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition 18 (1990) 380-393
47. Van Petten C., and Kutas M. Influences of semantics and syntactic context on open and closed class words. Memory & Cognition 19 (1991) 95-112