Will the Doha Round lead to preference erosion?

IMF Staff Papers

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 338-384

  Amiti, Mary ^a   Romalis, John ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447307915     PISSN: 10207635     EISSN: 15645150     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.imfsp.9450009     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Alexandraki, Katerina, and Hans Peter Lankes, 2004, "The Impact of Preference Erosion on Middle-Income Developing Countries," IMF Working Paper 04/169 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).
2. Amiti, Mary, and Jozef Konings, forthcoming, "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence fromIndonesia," American Economic Review.
3. Baldwin, R.E., and T. Murray, 1977, "MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits Under the GSP," Economic Journal Vol. 87 (March), pp. 30-46.
4. Brenton, Paul, and Takako Ikezuki, 2004, "The Initial and Potential Impact of Preferential Access to the U.S. Market under the African Growth and Opportunity Act," Policy Research Working Paper No. 3262 (Washington, World Bank).
5. Clausing, K.A., 2001, "Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement," Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 34 (August), pp. 677-696.
6. Dean, Judith M., and John Wainio, 2005, "Quantifying the Value of U.S. Tariff Preferences for Developing Countries," Policy Research Working Paper No. 3977 (Washington, World Bank).
7. DeVault, James, 1996, "Competitive Need Limits and the U.S. Generalized System of Preference," Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 14 (October), pp. 58-66.
8. European Commission, 2003, "User's Guide to the European Union's Scheme of Generalised Tariff Preferences" (Brussels), Available via the Internet: http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/issues/global/gsp/ gspguide.htm.
9. Evans, Carolyn L., and James Harrigan, 2004, "Tight Clothing: How the MFA Affects Asian Apparel Exports," NBER Working Paper No. 10250 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, National Bureau of Economic Research).
10. Francois, Joseph, Bernard Hoekman, and Miriam Manchin, 2005, "Preference Erosion and Multilateral Trade Liberalization," CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5153 (London, Centre for Economic Policy Research).
11. Hummels, David, 2001, "Toward a Geography of Trade Costs," (unpublished; West Lafayette, Indiana, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University). Available via the Internet: http://www.mgmt.purdue.edu/faculty/hummelsd/research/toward/TGTC.pdf.
12. Jean, Sébastien, David Laborde, and Will Martin, 2005, "Consequences of Alternative Formulas for Agricultural Tariff Cuts," Chapter 4 in Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, ed. by Kym Anderson and Will Martin (Washington, World Bank).
13. Lai, Huiwen, and Daniel Trefler, 2002, "The Gains from Trade with Monopolistic Competition: Specification, Estimation, and Mis-Specification," NBER Working Paper No. 9169 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, National Bureau of Economic Research).
14. MacPhee, Craig, and David I. Rosenbaum, 1989, "The Asymmetric Effects of Reversible Tariff Changes Under the United States GSP," Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 56 (July), pp. 105-125.
15. Mattoo, Aaditya, Devesh Roy, and Arvind Subramanian, 2002, "The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act and Its Rules of Origin: Generosity Undermined?" IMF Working Paper 02/158 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).
16. Ozden, Çaglar, and Eric Reinhardt, 2003, "The Perversity of Preferences: The Generalized Systemof Preferences and Developing Country Trade Policies, 1976-2000, " Policy Research Working Paper No. 2955 (Washington, World Bank).
17. Romalis, John, (forthcoming), "NAFTA's and CUSFTA's Impact on International Trade," Review of Economics and Statistics.
18. Subramanian, Arvind, 2003, "Financing of Losses from Preference Erosion," paper prepared by IMF staff for the World Trade Organization, WT/TF/COH/14/14, Geneva.
19. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2001, Improving Market Access for Least Developed Counties, UNCTAD/DITC/ TNCD/4. Available via the Internet: http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/ poditctncd4.en.pdf.
20. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2003, Trade Preferences for LDCs: An Early Assessment of Benefits and Possible Improvements, UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/2003/8 (New York and Geneva). Available via the Internet: http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/itcdtsb20038_en.pdf.
21. World Trade Organization, 2002, "Market Access: Unfinished Business - Post-Uruguay Round Inventory and Issues," Special Studies No. 6 (Geneva). Available via the Internet: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/ booksp_e/special_study_6_e.pdf.
22. World Trade Organization, 2003, "Negotiations on Agriculture: First Draft of Modalities for the Further Commitments," TN/AG/W/1Rev.1, March 18 (Geneva). Available via the Internet: http://www.wto.org/English/tratop_e/agric_e/negoti_mod2stdraft_e.htm.
23. Yang, Yongzheng, 2005, "Africa in the Doha Round: Dealing with Preference Erosion and Beyond," IMF Policy Discussion Paper No. 05/8 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).