Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 134-136

  Isaksson, Marléne ^a,b   Gruvberger, Birgitta ^a   Frick Engfeldt, Malin ^a   Bruze, Magnus ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Acetone; Ethanol; Patch testing; Solutions; Test chambers; Water

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ALCOHOL; WATER;

ADULT; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FINN CHAMBER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATCH TEST; VAN DER BEND CHAMBER;

ACETONE; ADULT; ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; ETHANOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; SOLVENTS; WATER;

EID: 34447297270     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01094.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Upadhye M R, Maibach H I. Influence of area of application of allergen on sensitization in contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1992 : 27 : 281 286.
2. Bruze M. Patch testing with nickel sulphate under occlusion for five hours. Acta Derm Venereol 1988 : 68 : 361 364.
3. Friedmann P S, Moss C, Shuster S, Simpson J M. Quantitative relationships between sensitizing dose of DNCB and reactivity in normal subjects. Clin Exp Immunol 1983 : 53 : 709 715.
4. Bruze M, Conde-Salazar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White I R. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1999 : 41 : 241 250.
5. Webster R C, Maibach H. Percutaneous absorption relative to occupational dermatology. In : Occupational and Industrial Dermatology, Maibach H (ed Chicago : Yearbook Medical Publishers Inc., 1987 : 241 257.
6. Fischer T, Maibach H. Finn chamber patch test technique. Contact Dermatitis 1984 : 11 : 137 140
7. Bruze M. Patch testing. In : Practical Contact Dermatitis, Guin J (ed New York : McGraw-Hill, 1995 : 41 62.