Milk analyses: A comparison between a simple IR-instrument for use on farm level and available IR-methods

Precision Livestock Farming 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 141-147

  Svennersten Sjaunja, K ^a   Sjogren M ^a,d   Andersson, I ^b   Sjaunja, L O ^c  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b Swedish Dairy Association   (Sweden)

^c MIRIS AB   (Sweden)

^d Svensk Avel   (Sweden)

Author keywords

IR instrument; Milk analysis; On farm analysis

Indexed keywords

COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; MIDINFRARED; MILK ANALYSIS; MILK SAMPLE; ON-FARM ANALYSIS; OVERALL ACCURACIES; REFERENCE METHOD;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; INFRARED INSTRUMENTS; INSTRUMENT ERRORS; PROTEINS; SUGARS;

INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 34447281134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. Sjaunja, L-O. 1986. Day-to-day variation in milk yield, milk composition, and somatic cell count. International Committee for Recording the Productivity of Milk Animals (ICRPMA), 25th Session.
2. Smith, S. J. 1998. Evaluation of analytical data. In: Food Analysis 2nd edition, p55-69. Ed. Nielsen S, Aspen publishers Inc., Gaithersbury, Maryland.
3. Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., Sjaunja, L-O., Bertilsson, J. and Wiktorsson, H. 1997. Use of regular milk records for nutrition and other kinds of management. Livestock Production Science, 48: 167-174.
4. Syrstad, O. 1977. Day-to-day variation in milk yield, fat content and protein content. Livestock Production Science 4: 141-151