Better outcomes in pulpotomies on primary molars with MTA

Evidence-Based Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-12

  Innes, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447278858     PISSN: 14620049     EISSN: 14765446     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400464     Document Type: Short Survey

References (6)

1. Nadin G, Goel BR, Yeung CA, Glenny AM. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; issue 1.
2. Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: A retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25:29-36.
3. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354:1896-1900.
4. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Prevention and management of dental decay in the pre-school child. A national clinical guideline. SIGN no. 83. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2005.
5. Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA, British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16 (suppl. 1): S15-S23.
6. Kunz R, Vist G, Oxman AD. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials. Cochrane Database Methodol Rev 2002; issue 4.