Small, but determined: Technological determinism in nanoscience

Nanotechnology Challenges: Implications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 95-130

  Mody, Cyrus C M ^a  

^a Chemical Heritage Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; TECHNOLOGICAL DETERMINISM;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 34447262554     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812773975_0006     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Anonymous: 2002, Small Wonders, Endless Frontiers: A Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
2. Amann, K.: 1994, ‘Menschen, Mause und Fliegen’, Zeitschrift fur Soziologie, 23, 22-40.
3. Bachelard, G.: 1984, The New Scientific Spirit, Beacon Press, Boston.
4. Baird, D.: 1993, ‘Analytical Chemistry and the Big Scientific Instrumentation Revolution’, Annals of Science, 50, 267-290.
5. Ball, P.: 2002, ‘Tutorial: Natural Strategies for the Molecular Engineer’, Nanotechnology, 13, 15-28.
6. Baum, R.; Drexler, K.E.; Smalley, R.: 2003, ‘Nanotechnology: Drexler and Smalley Make the Case For and Against ‘Molecular Assemblers’, Chemical and Engineering News, 81, 37-42.
7. Bijker, W.E.: 1995a, Of Bicycles, Bakelite, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Bijker, W.E.: 1995b, ‘Sociohistorical Technology Studies’, in: S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J. Petersen, T. Pinch (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, London, pp. 229-256.
9. Bijker, W.E.; Law, J.: 1992, ‘Do Technologies Have Trajectories?', in: W.E. Bijker, J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-16.
10. Bijker, W.E.; Pinch, T.: 1987, ‘The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other’, in: W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, T. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 17-50.
11. Bimber, B.: 1994, ‘Three Faces of Technological Determinism’, in: M.R. Smith, L. Marx (eds.), Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 79-100.
12. Brooks, L.J.: 2003, The Institute for the Future: A Site for Mapping, Maintaining, and Transforming Images of the Future, (Ph.D. dissertation) University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
13. Bush, V.: 1945, Science, the Endless Frontier, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
14. Clausen-Schaumann, H.; Seitz, M.; Krautbauer, R.; Gaub, H.E.: 2000, ‘Force Spectroscopy with Single Bio-Molecules’, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 4, 524-530.
15. Constant, E.W., II: 1980, The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
16. Crandall, B.: 1999, ‘Molecular Engineering’, in: B. Crandall (ed.), Nanotechnology: Molecular Speculations on Global Abundance, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-46.
17. Dewey, J.: 1958, Experience and Nature, Dover, New York.
18. Drexler, K.E.: 1981, ‘Molecular Engineering - an Approach to the Development of General Capabilities for Molecular Manipulation’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America-Physical Sciences, 78, 5275-5278.
19. Drexler, K.E.: 1990 [1986], Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology, Anchor Books, New York.
20. Drexler, K.E.: 1992, Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation, Wiley, New York.
21. Eigler, D.M.; Schweizer, E.K.: 1990, ‘Positioning Single Atoms With a Scanning Tunneling Microscope’, Nature, 344, 524-526.
22. Feynman, R.: 1999 [1959], ‘There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom: An Invitation to Enter a New Field of Physics’, in: The Pleasure of Finding Things Out, Perseus, Cambridge, MA, pp. 117-139.
23. Francoeur, E.: 1997, ‘The Forgotten Tool: The Design and Use of Molecular Models’, Social Studies of Science, 27, 7-40.
24. Galison, P.: 1996, ‘Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone’, in: P. Galison, D.J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 118-157.
25. Galison, P.: 1997, Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. Galison, P.; Stump, D.J. (eds.): 1996, The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
27. Gieryn, T.F.: 1999, Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Gieryn, T.F.; Figert, A.E.: 1986, ‘Scientists Protect Their Cognitive Authority: The Status Degradation Ceremony of Sir Cyril Burt’, in: G. Böhme, N. Stehr (eds.), The Knowledge Society, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 67-89.
29. Gross, M.: 1999, Travels to the Nanoworld: Miniature Machinery in Nature and Technology, Plenum, New York.
30. Guerlac, H.: 1961, Lavoisier - The Crucial Year, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
31. Guthold, M.; Falvo, M.R.; Matthews, W.G.; Paulson, S.; Washburn, S.; Erie, D.A.; Superfine, R.; Brooks, F.P.; Taylor, R.M.: 2000, ‘Controlled Manipulation of Molecular Samples with the NanoManipulator’, IEEE-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 5, 189-198.
32. Hacking, I.: 1983, Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
33. Hacking, I.: 1992, ‘The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences’, in: A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 29-64.
34. Hecht, G.: 1998, The Radiance of France: Technology, Politics, and National Identity after World War II, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Hecht, G., Allen, M.T.: 2001, ‘Introduction: Authority, Political Machines, and Technology’s History’, in: M.T. Allen, G. Hecht (eds.), Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-23.
36. Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie, E. Robinson, Harper & Row, New York.
37. Heidegger, M.: 1977, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper Colophon Books, New York.
38. Helmreich, S.: 1998, Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
39. Hughes, T.P.: 1983, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
40. Hughes, T.P.: 1994, ‘Technological Momentum’, in: MR. Smith, L. Marx (eds.), Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 101-114.
41. Ihde, D.: 1991, Instrumental Realism: The Interface between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
42. Kay, L.: 2000, Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
43. Kline, R.: 1992, Steinmetz: Engineer and Socialist, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
44. Kline, R.: 1995, ‘Construing ‘Technology’ as ‘Applied Science": Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, Isis, 86, 194-221.
45. Kline, R.: 2000, ‘The Paradox of’Engineering Science’: A Cold War Debate about Education in the United States’, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 19, 19-25.
46. Kline, R.; Pinch, T.: 1996, ‘Users as Agents of Technological Change: The Social Construction of the Automobile in the Rural United States’, Technology and Culture, 37, 763-95.
47. Knorr-Cetina, K.: 1992, ‘The Couch, the Cathedral, and the Laboratory: On the Relationship between Experiment and Laboratory in Science’, in: A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 113-138.
48. Knorr-Cetina, K.: 1999, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
49. Kranakis, E.: 1997, Constructing a Bridge: An Exploration of Engineering Culture, Design, and Research in Nineteenth-Century France and America, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
50. Kuhn, T.S.: 1996, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
51. Latour, B.: 1983, ‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World’, in: K. Knorr-Cetina, M. Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed, Sage, London, pp. 141-170.
52. Latour, B.: 1996, Aramis or The Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. th-Century America’, Technology and Culture, 12, 562-580.
54. Lenhard, J.: 2004, ‘Nanoscience and the Janus-Faced Character of Simulations’, in: D. Baird, A. Nordmann, J. Schummer (eds.), Discovering the Nanoscale, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 93-100.
55. Mackenzie, D.: 1996a, ‘Economic and Sociological Explanations of Technological Change’, in: Knowing Machines: Essays on Technical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 49-65.
56. Mackenzie, D.: 1996b, ‘Marx and the Machine’, in: Knowing Machines: Essays on Technical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 23-47.
57. Marty, A.: 2003, Testimony before the Committee on Science on HR 766, Nanotechnology Research and Development Act, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
58. Marx, K.: 1963 [1847], The Poverty of Philosophy, International Publishers, New York.
59. Milburn, C: 2002, ‘Nanotechnology in the Age of Posthuman Engineering: Science Fiction as Science’, Configurations, 10, 261-295.
60. Misa, T.: 1988, ‘How Machines Make History and How Historians (and Others) Help Them to Do So’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 13, 308-331.
61. Mody, C.C.M.: 2000, "A New Way of Flying’: Différance, Rhetoric, and the Autogiro in Interwar Aviation’, Social Studies of Science, 30, 513-543.
62. Mody, C.C.M.: 2001, ‘A Little Dirt Never Hurt Anyone: Knowledge-Making and Contamination in Materials Science’, Social Studies of Science, 31, 7-36.
63. Mody, C.C.M.: 2004, ‘How Probe Microscopists Became Nanotechnologists’, in: D. Baird, A. Nordmann & J. Schummer (eds.), Discovering the Nanoscale, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 119-133.
64. Nordmann, A.: 2004, ‘Molecular Disjunctions’, in: D. Baird, A. Nordmann & J. Schummer (eds.), Discovering the Nanoscale, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 51-62.
65. Nye, D.E.: 1994, American Technological Sublime, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
66. Nye, D.E.: 2003, America as Second Creation: Technology and Narratives of New Beginnings, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
67. Pinch, T.: 1986, Confronting Nature, Reidel, Dordrecht.
68. Pinch, T.: 1993, "Testing - One, Two, Three… Testing!': Toward a Sociology of Testing’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 18, 25-41.
69. Polanyi, M.: 1962, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Harper Torchbooks, New York.
70. Ratner, M.; Ratner, D.: 2003, Nanotechnology: A Gentle Introduction to the Next Big Idea, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
71. Regis, E.: 1995, Nano: The Emerging Science of Nanotechnology, Little, Brown, Boston.
72. Reinhardt, C: 2004, ‘Chemistry in a Physical Mode: Molecular Spectroscopy and the Emergence of NMR’, Annals of Science, 61, 1-32.
73. Rheinberger, H.-J.: 1997, Toward a History ofEpistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
74. Roco, M.C.: 2003, ‘Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology’, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5, 181-189.
75. Rohrer, H.: 1995, ‘The Nanometer Age - Challenge and Chance’, Microelectronic Engineering, 27, 3-15.
76. Rosen, P.: 1993, ‘The Social Construction of Mountain Bikes: Technology and Postmodernity in the Cycle Industry’, Social Studies of Science, 23, 479-513.
77. Schummer, J.: 2004, ‘Interdisciplinary Issues in Nanoscale Research’, in: D. Baird, A. Nordmann & J. Schummer (eds.), Discovering the Nanoscale, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 9-20.
78. Smith, M.R.; Marx, L. (eds.): 1994, Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
79. Soong, R.; Bachand, G.; Neves, H.; Olkhovets, A.; Craighead, H.; Montemagno, C: 2000, ‘Powering an Inorganic Nanodevice with a Biomolecular Motor’, Science, 290, 1555-1558.
80. Star, S.L.; Griesemer, J.R.: 1989, ‘Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939', Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
81. Stix, G.: 2001, ‘Little Big Science: Nanotechnology Is All the Rage. But Will It Meet Its Ambitious Goals? And What The Heck Is It?', Scientific American, 285, 32-37.
82. Sullivan, D.: 1994, ‘Exclusionary Epideictic: NOVA’s Narrative Excommunication of Fleischmann and Pons’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 19, 283-306.
83. Swami, N.: 2002, Testimony before Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
84. Tour, J.M.: 2003, Molecular Electronics: Commercial Insights, Chemistry, Devices, Architecture and Programming, World Scientific, Singapore.
85. Turner, F.: forthcoming, ‘When the Counterculture Met Computer Networks and the New Economy: Revisiting the WELL and the Origins of Virtual Community’, Technology and Culture.
86. Viani, M.B.; Schaffer, T.E.; Chand, A.; Rief, M.; Gaub, H.E.; Hansma, P.K.: 1999, ‘Small Cantilevers for Force Spectroscopy of Single Molecules’, Journal of Applied Physics, 86, 2258-2262.
87. Vincenti, W.G.: 1990, What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
88. Wenger, E.: 1998, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
89. White, L.: 1962, Medieval Technology and Social Change, Clarendon, Oxford.
90. Whitesides, G.M.: 2001, ‘The Once and Future Nanomachine’, Scientific American, 285, 78-83.
91. Whitesides, G.M.; Love, J.C.: 2001, ‘The Art of Building Small: Researchers Are Discovering Cheap, Efficient Ways to Make Structures Only a Few Billionths of a Meter Across’, Scientific American, 285, 39-47.
92. Winner, L.: 1993, ‘Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 18, 362-378.