Choix d'imposition et interactions spatiales entre collectivités locales: Un test sur les départements français

Recherches Economiques de Louvain

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 67-93

  Lcprince, Matthieu ^a   Paty, Sonia ^b   Reulier, Emmanuelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447249392     PISSN: 07704518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/rel.711.067     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, J.E. et R.W. Wassmer (1995), "The decision to bid for business: Municipal behavior in granting' property tax abatements", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, pp. 739-757.
2. Ansclin, L. (1988), Spatial econometrics: Methods and models, Kluwcr Academic Publishers, Dordrecht et al. (eds).
3. Besley, T. et A. Case (1995a), "Incumbent behavior: Vote seeking, tax setting and yardstick competition", American Economic Review, 85, pp. 25-45.
4. Bcslcy, T. et A. Case (1995b), "Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 150, pp. 769-798.
5. Bcslcy, T. et H. Rosen (1998), "Vertical externalities in tax setting: Evidence from gasoline and cigarettes", Journal of Public Economics, 70, pp. 383-398.
6. Bordignon, M., F. Cerniglia et F. Revelli (2003), "In search of yardstick competition: A spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting", Journal of Urban Economics, 54, pp. 199-217.
7. Brett, C. et J. Pinske, (2000), "The determinants of municipal tax rates in British Columbia", Canadian Journal of Economics, 33, pp. 695-714.
8. Brueckner, J.K. (1996), "Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls", Journal of Urban Economics, 44, pp. 438-467.
9. Brueckner, J.K. et L. Saavedra (2001), "Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition?", National Tax Journal, 54, pp. 203-229.
10. Brueckner, J.K. (2001), Strategic interaction among' governments: An overview of empirical studies, mimeo.
11. Buettner, T. (2001), "Local capital income taxation and competition for capital: The choice of the tax rate", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31, pp. 215-245.
12. Case, A.C. (1993), "Interstate tax competition after TRA86", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12, pp. 136-48.
13. Case, A.C., H.S. Rosen et J.R. Hines (1993), "Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states", Journal of Public Economics, 52, pp. 285-307.
14. Cliff, A. et J. Ord (1973), Spatial autocorrelation, London, Pion.
15. Conseil des impôts, (1997), Quinzième rapport au Président de la République relatif à la taxe professionnelle, Paris, Journal Officiel de la République Française.
16. Estellcr-Moré, A. et A. Solé-Ollé (2001), "Vertical income tax externalities and fiscal interdependance: evidence from the US", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31, pp. 247-272.
17. Feld, L. (2000), "Tax competition and income redistribution: An empirical analysis for Switzerland", Public Choice, 105, pp. 125-164.
18. Feld, L., J.M. Josselin et Y. Rocaboy (2002), « Le mimétisme fiscal: une application aux régions françaises », Économie et Prévision, 156, pp. 43-49.
19. Feld, L. et G. Kircligässner (2001), "Income tax competition at the state and local level in Switzerland", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31, pp. 181-213.
20. Feld, L. et G. Kirchgässner (2003), "The impact of corporate and personal income taxes on the location of firms and on employment: Some panel evidence for the Swiss cantons", Journal of Public Economics, 87, pp. 129-155.
21. Feld, L. et E. Reulier (2002), Strategic tax competition in Switzerland: Evidence from a panel of the Swiss Cantons, mimeo.
22. Figlio, D.N., V.W. Kolpin et W.E. Reid (1999), "Do states play welfare games?", Journal of Urban Economics, 46, pp. 437-454.
23. Geary, R. (1954), "The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping", The Incorporated, 5, pp. 115-145.
24. Gilbert, G. et Y. Rocaboy (1996), "Local public spending in France: The case of welfare programs at the département level", in G. Pola, G. France et R. Levaggi (eds), Developments in local government finance: Theory and policy, Edward Elgar, pp. 97-114.
25. Goodspeed, T.J. (1999), Tax competition and tax structure in open federal economies: Evidence from OECD countries with implications for the European Union, mimeo.
26. Goodspeed, T.J. (2000), "Tax structure in federation", Journal of Public Economics, 75, pp. 493-506.
27. Guengant, A. (1992), Taxe professionnelle et intercommunalité , LGDJ, Paris.
28. Hayashi, M. et R. Boadway (2001), "An empirical analysis of intergouvern-mental tax interaction: The case of business income taxes in Canada", Canadian Journal of Economies, 34, pp. 481-503.
29. Heyndels, B. et J. Vuchelen (1998), "Tax mimicking among belgian municipalities", National Tax Journal, 51, pp. 89-101.
30. Houdebinc, M. et J.L. Schneider (1998), « Mesurer l'influence de la fiscalité sur la localisation des entreprises », Économie et Prévision, 131, pp. 47-64.
31. Jayet, H. (1993), Analyse spatiale quantitative: une introduction, Bibliothèque de Science Régionale, Economica.
32. Jayct, H. (2001), « Économétric et données spatiales: une introduction à la pratique », Cahiers d'économie et sociologies rurales, 58/59, pp. 105-129.
33. Kelejian, H.H. et LR. Prucha, (1998), "A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances", Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, pp. 99-121.
34. Kelejian, H.H. et D.P. Robinson (1993), "A suggested method of estimation for spatial interdependent models with autocorrclated errors and an application to a county expenditure model", Papers in Regional Science, 72, pp. 297-312.
35. Ladd, H.F. (1992), "Mimicking of local tax burdens among neighboring countries", Public Finance Quaterly, 20, pp. 450-67.
36. Laussel, D. et M. Le Breton (1998), "Existence of Nash equilibria in fiscal competition models", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28, pp. 283-296.
37. Leprincc, M. et A. Gucngant (2002), « Interactions fiscales verticales et reaction des communes à la coopération intercommunale », Revue économique, 53, pp. 125-135.
38. Mintz, J. et H. Tulkens (1986), "Commodity tax competition between member states of a federation: Equilibrium and efficiency", Journal of Public Economics, 29, pp. 133-172.
39. Moran, P. (1948), "The interpretation of statistical map", Journal of the Royal Statistical B, 10, pp. 243-251.
40. Paty, S., H. Jayet et A. Pentel (2002), "Existe-t-il des interactions fiscales stratégiques entre les collectivités locales?", Économie et Prévision, 3, pp. 95-106.
41. Revclli, F. (2001), "Spatial patterns in local taxation: tax mimicking or error mimicking?", Applied Economics, 33, pp. 1101-1107.
42. Richard, J.F., H. Tulkens et M. Verdonc, (2002), «Dynamiques des interactions fiscales entre les communes belges 1984-1997 », Économie et Prévision, vol. 156 (5), pp. 1-14.
43. Rubinfeld, D. (1987), "The economics of the local public sector", in A. Auerbach et M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 571-645.
44. Saavedra, L.A. (1999), "A model of welfare competition with evidence from AFDC", Journal of Urban Economics, 47, pp. 248-279.
45. Salmon, P. (1987), "Decentralisation as an incentive scheme", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3, pp. 24-43.
46. Shleifer, A. (1985), "A theory of yardstick competition", Rand Journal of Economics, 16, pp. 319-327.
47. Shrödcr, M. (1996), "Gaines the states don't play: Welfare benefits and the theory of fiscal federalism", Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, pp. 183-191.
48. Smith, M.W. (1997), "State welfare benefits: The political economy of spatial spillovers", Working paper, Yale University.
49. Solé-Ollé, A. (2003), "Electoral accountability and tax mimicking: The effects of electoral margins, coalition government, and ideology", European Journal of Political Economy, 19, pp. 685-713.
50. Tiebout, CM. (1956), "A pure theory of local expenditures", Journal of Political Economy, 64, pp. 416-424.
51. Verdonck, M. (2000), Fiscal competition: A survey of the empirical literature, dans Concurrence fiscale en matière d'IPP, étude sous la direction d'H. Tulkens, CORE, Université Catholique de Louvain.
52. Wildasin, D.E. (1988), "Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition", Journal of Public Economics, 35, pp. 229-240.
53. Wildasin, D.E. (1989), "Interjurisdictional capital mobility: Fiscal externality and a corrective subsidy", Journal of Urban Economics, 25, pp. 193-212.
54. Wildasin, D.E. (1991), "Some rudimentary « duopolity » theory", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21, pp. 393-421.
55. Wilson, J.D. (1986), "A theory of interregional tax competition", Journal of Urban Economics, 19, pp. 296-315.
56. Wilson, J. (1999), "Theories of tax competition", National Tax Journal, 52, pp. 269-304.
57. Zodrow, G.R. et P. Mieszkowski (1986), "Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods", Journal of Urban Economics, 19, pp. 356-370.