The impact of speed post-processing methods on regional mobile emissions estimation

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 307-324

  Bai, Song ^a   Nie, Yu ^b   Niemeier, Debbie A ^a  

^a University of California Davis   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Air quality; Emission inventory; Mobile emission; Speed post processing

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; ESTIMATION; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; SPEED CONTROL;

MOBILE EMISSION; SPEED POST-PROCESSING METHOD; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING PROCESS;

EMISSION CONTROL;

AIR QUALITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34447136290     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2007.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Akcelik, R., 1981. Traffic signals: Capacity and time analysis. Research Report 123, Australian Road Research Board, Canberra.
2. Akcelik R. Travel time functions for transport planning purposes: Davidson's function, its time-dependent form and an alternative travel time function. Journal of the Australian Road Research 21 (1991) 49-59
3. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 1997. Model validation and reasonableness checking manual. Prepared for Travel Model Improvement Program, Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
4. California Air Resource Board. 2002 EMFAC2002: The latest update to the on-road emissions inventory. Available from: .
5. California Air Resource Board. 2004. Public meeting to consider approval of revisions to the State's on-road motor vehicle emissions inventory: Technical support document. Available from: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/on-road/doctable_test.htm.
6. California Department of Transportation. 2001. DTIM4 user's guide. Office of Travel Forecasting and Analysis, Caltrans, Sacremeto.
7. Chatterjee, A., Miller, T., Philpot, J., Wholley, T., Guensler, R., Hartgen, D., Margiotta, R., Stopher, P.R., 1997. Improving transportation data for mobile source emission estimates. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 394. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
8. Data Management Group. (1991) Road network coding manual: Technical report. Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto, Canada.
9. Davidson, K.B., 1966. A flow travel-time relationship for use in transportation planning. In: Proceeding of the 3rd Australia Road Research Board Conference, Sydney, pp. 183-194.
10. Davidson K.B. The theoretical basis of a flow travel-time relationship for use in transportation planning. Journal of the Australian Road Research 8 (1978) 32-35
11. DKS Associates, 2001. Pre-census travel behavior report: Analysis of the 2000 SACOG Household Travel Survey. Sacramento Area Council of Governments, SACOG-01-014 Sacramento.
12. DKS Associates, 2002. Model update report: Sacramento regional travel demand model version 2001 (SACMET 01). Sacramento Area Council of Governments, SACOG-02-003, Sacramento.
13. Dowling R., and Skabardonis A. Improving average travel speeds estimated by planning models. Transportation Research Record 1366 (1993) 68-74
14. Helali K., and Hutchinson B. Improving road link speed estimates for air quality models. Transportation Research Record 1444 (1994) 71-77
15. Ntziachristos L., and Samaras Z. Speed-dependent representative emission factors for catalyst passenger cars and influencing parameters. Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 4611-4619
16. Singh, R., 1999. Improved speed-flow relationships: Application to transportation planning models. Paper presented at the 7th TRB Conference on Application of Transportation Planning Methods, Boston.
17. Skabardonis A., and Dowling R. Improved speed-flow relationship for planning applications. Transportation Research Record 1572 (1997) 18-23
18. Stopher P.R., and Fu H.Q. Feasible Improvements to Travel-forecasting Procedure for Air Quality Analysis. Transportation Planning and Air Quality III: Emerging Strategies and Working Solutions (1998), American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, DC
19. Transportation Research Board. 1985, 1994, 2000. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. National Research Council, Washington, DC.
20. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004. Technical guidance on the use of MOBILE6 for emission inventory preparation. Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Transportation and Regional Programs Division. EPA420-R-04-013. Washington, DC.
21. Winiwarter W., Dore C., Hayman G., Vlachogiannis D., Gounaris N., Bartzis J., Ekstrand S., Tamponi M., and Maffeis G. Methods for comparing gridded inventories of atmospheric emissions - Application for Milan province, Italy and the greater Athens area, Greece. The Science of the Total Environment 303 (2003) 231-243