Magnetic resonance venography of the lower limb

International Angiology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 171-182

  Koizumi, J ^a   Horie, T ^a   Muro, I ^a   Kimura, E ^a   Shimizu, K ^a   Orii, M ^a   Imai, Y ^a   D'Othee, B Janne ^b   Nishibe, T ^c   Wada, M ^d   Momoshima, S ^e  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d SAITAMA NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^e KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Deep venous thrombosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Varicose veins; Venography

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FASCIA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LEG VARICOSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATOR; PATIENT POSITIONING; PHLEBOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VARICOSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; VARICOSE VEINS; VEINS; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

EID: 34447134720     PISSN: 03929590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J. The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:1044-9.
2. Forbes K, Stevenson AJ. The use of power Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of isolated deep venous thrombosis of the calf. Clin Radiol 1998;53:752-4.
3. Campbell WB, Halim AS, Aertssen A, Ridler BM, Thompson JF, Niblett PG. The place of duplex scanning for varicose veins and common venous problems. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996;78:490-3.
4. Bohler K, Baldt M, Schuller-Petrovic S, Grunwald C, Sellner W, Watzke H et al. Varicose vein stripping: a prospective study of the thrombotic risk and the diagnostic significance of preoperative color coded duplex sonography. Thromb Haemost 1995;73:597-600.
5. Baker WF Jr. Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Med Clin North Am 1998;82:459-76.
6. Weber J. Phlebological diagnosis. Phlebography of the veins of the lower extremity. Zentralbl Chir 2001;126:466-71.
7. Wille-Jorgensen P, Borris L, Jorgensen LN, Hauch O, Lassen MR, Nehen AM et al. Phlebography as the gold standard in thromboprophylactic studies? A multicenter interobserver variation study. Acta Radiol 1992;33:24-8.
8. Caggiati A, Luccichenti G, Pavone P. Three-dimensional phlebography of the saphenous venous system. Circulation 2000;102:E33-5.
9. Ruehm SG, Wiesner W, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity veins: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR verrography with a dedicated vascular coil-initial experience. Radiology 2000;215:421-7.
10. Fraser DG, Moody AR, Davidson IR, Martel AL, Morgan PS. Deep venous thrombosis: diagnosis by using venous enhanced subtructed peak arterial MR venognaphy versus conventional venography. Radiology 2003;226:812-20.
11. Holtz DJ, Debatin JF, McKinnon GC, Unterweger M, Wildermuth S, von Schulthess GK et al. MR venography of the calf: value of flow-enhanced time-of-flight echoplanar imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:663-8.
12. Ruehm S. MR venography. In: Syllabus Weekend Educational Courses. ISMRM-ESMRMB joint annual meeting, Glasgow, Scotland; April 21-22, 2001.p.580-5.
13. Higuchi N, Yuasa Y, Izutsu M et al. MR venography using hybrid fat suppression multishot RARE. Jpn J MRM 1992;12:252.
14. Gallix BP, Achard-Lichere C, Dauzat M, Bruel JM, Lopez FM. Flow-independent magnetic resonance venography of the calf. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:421-6.
15. Thiele H, Nagel E, Paetsch I, Schnackenburg B, Bornstedt A, Kouwenhoven M et al. Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady-state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:362-7.
16. Giorgi B, Dymarkowski S, Maes F, Kouwenhoven M, Bogaert J. Improved visualization of coronary arteries using a new three-dimensional submillimeter MR coronary angiography sequence with balanced gradients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:901-10.
17. Etienne A, Botnar RM, Van Muiswinkel AM, Boesiger P, Manning WJ, Stuber M. "Soap-Bubble" visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:658-66.
18. Moody AR, Pollock JG, O'Connor AR, Bagnall M. Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: direct MR imaging of the thrombus. Radiology 1998;209:349-55.
19. Koizumi J, Wada M, Horie T, Kimura E, Muro I, Myojin K et al. Magnetic resonance venography without contrast media for patients with lower extremity varicose veins. ECR 2003;(http://www.ecr.org/):C906.
20. Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2409-18.
21. Larsson EM, Sunden P, Olsson CG, Debatin J, Duerinckx AJ, Baum R et al. MR venography using an intravascular contrast agent: results from a multicenter phase 2 study of dosage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:227-32.
22. Saeed M, Wendland MF, Higgins CB. Blood pool MR contrast agents for cardiovascular imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:890-8.