Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife

Ecological Economics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 807-814

  Ojea, Elena ^a   Loureiro, Maria L ^b  

^a IDEGA Universidade de Santiago de Compostela ^*  (Spain)

^b Ramó   (Spain)

Author keywords

Altruistic; Biospheric; Egoistic; GAC scale; Value orientations; WTP

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ETHICS; SEABIRD; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; GALICIA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

URIA AALGE;

EID: 34447130882     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 179-211
2. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P., Leamer E., Radner R., and Schuman H. Report of the NOAA Panel of contingent valuation. Federal Register 58 10 (1993) 4602-4614
3. Blamey R., and Common M. Respondents to contingent valuation surveys: citizens or consumers?. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39 (1995) 263-288
4. Booth D.E. Biocentric Environmental Values and Support for the Ecological Restoration of Urban Watersheds (2000), Institute for Urban Environmental Risk Management Marquette University Milwaukee
5. Cooper P., Poe G.L., and Bateman I.J. The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement. Ecological Economics 50 (2004) 69-82
6. Dunlap E.E., and Van Liere K.D. The new environmental paradigm: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 9 (1978) 10-19
7. Gelso B.R., and Peterson J.M. The influence of ethical attitudes on the demand for environmental recreation: incorporating lexicographic preferences. Ecological Economics 53 (2005) 35-45
8. Johansson-Stenman O. The importance of ethics in environmental economics with a focus on existence values. Environmental & Resource Economics 11 3-4 (1998) 429-442
9. Kotchen M.J., and Reiling S.D. Environmental attitudes motivations and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics 32 (2000) 93-107
10. Luzar E.J., and Cosse K.J. Willingness to pay or intention to pay: the attitude-behavior relationship in contingent valuation. Journal of Socio-Economics 27 3 (1998) 427-444
11. In: Martí R., and Del Moral J.C. (Eds). Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España (2003), Ministerio de Medioambiente and Sociedad Española de Ornitología (SEO/Birdlife)
12. Mitchell R.C., and Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods, the Contingent Valuation Method (1989), Resources for the Future, Washington DC
13. Novotny V., Clark D., Griffin R., Bartosova A., Booth D., and Anderson R. Risk Based Watershed Management, Integration of Water Quality and Flood Control Objectives, Final Report (2001), Center for Urban Environmental Studies, Northeastern University Boston
14. Pouta, E., 2003. Attitude-behavior framework on contingent valuation of forest conservation. Academic Dissertation, University of Hesinki.
15. Pouta E. Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey. Journal of Economic Psychology 25 (2004) 229-242
16. Pouta E., and Rekola M. The theory of planned behavior in predicting willingness to pay for abatement of forest regeneration. Society and Natural Resources 14 (2001) 93-106
17. Rosenberger R.S., Peterson G.L., Clarke A., and Brown T. Measuring dispositions for lexicographic preferences of environmental goods: integrating economics, psychology and ethics. Ecological Economics 44 (2003) 63-76
18. Sagoff M. Should preferences count?. Land Economics 70 2 (1994) 127-144
19. Schwartz S.H. Moral decision making and behavior. In: Macauley L., and Berkowitz L. (Eds). Altruism and Helping Behavior (1970), New York Academic Press (in Stern, Dietz & Guagnano, 1995)
20. Spash C.L. Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 50 4 (1997) 403-416
21. Spash C.L. Ecosystems contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation. Ecological Economics 34 (2000) 195-215
22. Spash C.L. Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: coral reef biodiversity. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (2002) 665-687
23. Spash C.L. Non-economic motivation for contingent values: rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Economics 82 4 (2006) 602-622
24. Spash C.L., and Hanley N. Preferences information and biodiversity preservation. Ecological Economics 12 (1995) 191-208
25. Stern P.C., and Díetz T. The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues 50 3 (1994) 65-84
26. Stern P.C., Dietz T., and Kalof L. Value orientations, gender and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 25 (1993) 322-348
27. Stern P.C., Dietz T., and Guagnano G.A. The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior 27 6 (1995) 723-743
28. Stevens T.H., Echevarria J., Glass R.J., Hager T., and More T.A. Measuring the existence value of wildlife: what do CVM really show?. Land Economics 67 4 (1991) 390-400
29. Tarrant M.A., and Cordell H.K. The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environment and Behavior 29 (1997) 618-638