Wellbeing, functional performance and personal control about care provision of non-institutionalized and institutionalized elderly;Welbevinden, functionele performantie en persoonlijke controle bij ouderen thuis en in het woonzorgcentrum

Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 134-146

  Van Roosmalen, Griet ^a,b   Marcoen, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Centrum V Ontwikkelingspsychologie   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELDERLY CARE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; LEISURE; LIFE SATISFACTION; NURSING HOME; SELF CARE; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; WELLBEING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HOMES FOR THE AGED; HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY; HUMANS; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; INTERVIEWS; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MALE; NURSING HOMES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CARE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34447128301     PISSN: 01679228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Biggs S. Beyond appearances: perspectives on identity in later life and some implications for method. J Gerontology Soc Sci, 2005; 60B: S118-S128.
2. Jacobs T, Vanderleyden L, Vanden Boer L, Eds. Op latere leeftijd. De leefsituatie van 55-plussers in Vlaanderen. Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant, 2004.
3. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE Smith HL. Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 1999; 125: 276-302.
4. Kempen GIJM, Ormel J. Het meten van psychologisch welbevinden bij ouderen. Tijdschr Geront Geriatr 1992; 23: 225-235.
5. Ormel J, Lindenberg S, Steverink N, Verbrugge LM. Subjective wellbeing and social production functions. Social Indicators Research 1999; 46: 61-90.
6. Ormel J, Lindenberg S, Steverink N, Vonkorff M. Quality of life and social production functions: A framework for understanding health effects. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1051-1063.
7. Steverink N, Lindenberg S, Ormel J. Towards understanding of successful aging: Patterned change in resources and goals. Aging and Society 1998; 18: 441-467.
8. Lawton MP, DeVoe MR, Parmelee P. Relationship of events and affect in the daily life of an elderly population. Psychol Aging 1995; 10: 469-477.
9. Qassis S, Hayden DC. Effects of environment on psychological wellbeing of elderly persons. Psychological Reports,1990; 66: 147-150.
10. Baltes MM, Wahl H-W, Reichert M. Successful aging in long-term care institutions? In: Schaie KW, Lawton MP, Eds. Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics. New York: Springer, 1991: 311-337.
11. Leidy NK. Functional status and the forward progress of merry-go-rounds: Toward a coherent analytic framework. Nurs Res 1994; 43: 196-202.
12. Van Roosmalen G, Marcoen A. Persoonlijke controle en functionele performantie bij ouderen thuis en in het bejaardentehuis. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2006; 37: 169-183.
13. Baltes MM, Maas I, Wilms H-U, Borchelt M, Little TD. Everyday competence in old and very old age: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. In: Baltes PB, Mayer KU, Eds. The Berlin Aging Study: Aging from 70 to 100. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 384-402.
14. Horgas AL, Wilms HU, Baltes, MM. Daily life in very old age: Everyday activities as expression of successful living. The Gerontologist 1998; 38: 556-568.
15. Noro A, Aro S. Comparison of health and functional ability between noninstitutionalized and least institutionalized elderly in Finland. The Gerontologist 1997; 37: 374-382.
16. Vermeulen CA, Bosma AMM. De gezondheid van ouderen: Epidemiologie en beleid. Nietgepubliceerd proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1992.
17. Liang J, Krause NM, Bennet JM. Social exchange and wellbeing: Is giving better than receiving? Psychol Aging 2001; 16: 511-523.
18. Menec VH. The relationship between everyday activities and successful aging: A 6-year longitudinal study. J Gerontology Soc Sci 2003; 58B: S74-S82.
19. Depp CA, Jeste DV. Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry, 2006; 14: 6-20.
20. McKee KJ, Lee K. Activity, friendships and wellbeing in residential settings for older people. Aging Ment Health, 1999; 3: 143-152.
21. Chappell NL, Badger M. Social isolation and wellbeing. Journals of gerontology 1989; 44: S169-S176.
22. Cohen CI, Teresi J, Holmes D. Social networks and adaptation. Gerontologist 1985; 25: 297-304.
23. Penning MJ, Strain LA. Gender differences in disability, assistance, and subjective wellbeing in later life. J Gerontology Soc Sci 1994; 49: S202-S208.
24. Silverstein M, Chen X, Heller K. Too much of a good thing? Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1996; 58: 970-982.
25. Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, Eds. Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 1-34.
26. Baltes MM. The many faces of dependency in old age. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
27. Menec VH, Chipperfield JG. The interactive effect of perceived control and functional status on health and mortality among young-old and old-old adults. J Gerontology Psychol Sci 1997; 52B: P118-P126.
28. Lang FR, Heckhausen JH. Perceived control over development and subjective wellbeing: differential benefits across adulthood. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001; 81: 509-523.
29. Brandtstädter J, Baltes-Götz B. Personal control over development and quality of life perspectives in adulthood. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, Eds. Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 197-224.
30. Kunzmann U, Little T, Smith J. Perceiving control: A double-edged sword in old age. J Gerontol Psychol Sci, 2002; 57B: P484-P491.
31. Vanden Boer L, Jacobs T, Vanderleyden L, Audenaert V, Pauwels K. Het Leefsituatieonderzoek Vlaamse Ouderen (LOVO). Onderzoeksdesign, theoretisch achtergrond, concepten, meetinstrumenten. Document 2001/8 van het Centrum voor Bevolkings- en Gezinsstudie, Brussel, 2001.
32. Maes MJ. De relatie serviceflat-rusthuis: Een empirisch onderzoek naar de preferenties van aspirant- en huidige bewoners inzake beleid en dienstverlening. Ongepubliceerd doctoraatsproefschrift Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1996.
33. Carstensen, LL. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychol Aging 1992; 7: 331-338.
34. Chipperfield JG, Greenslade L. Perceived control as a buffer in the use of health care services. J Gerontology Psychol Sci 1999; 54B: P146-P154.
35. Pauwels K, Vanden Boer L. Rusthuisbewoners krijgen een stem, mede dankzij de inzet van senioren. Wijs over Grijs, 2004; 8: 3-6.