Optimal reserve site selection with distance requirements

Computers and Operations Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 488-498

  Williams, Justin C ^a  

^a The Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Integer programming; Reserve site selection; Site connectivity; Site separation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DATA ACQUISITION; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

RESERVE SITE SELECTION; SITE CONNECTIVITY; SITE SEPARATION;

SITE SELECTION;

EID: 34447100527     PISSN: 03050548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ReVelle C.S., Williams J.C., and Boland J.J. Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 2 (2002) 71-80
2. Williams JC, ReVelle CS, Levin SA. Spatial attributes and reserve design models: a review, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2005;10(3):163-181.
3. Possingham H., Day J., Goldfinch M., and Salzborn F. The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation. In: Sutton D., Cousins E., and Pierce C. (Eds). Decision sciences tools for today. Proceedings of the 12th Australian operations research conference (1993), Adelaide, ASOR 536-545
4. Underhill L. Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biological Conservation 35 (1994) 85-87
5. Williams J.C., and ReVelle C.S. Applying mathematical programming to reserve selection. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2 (1997) 167-175
6. Ando A., Camm J., Polasky S., and Solow A. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279 (1998) 2126-2128
7. Toregas C., and ReVelle C. Binary logic solutions to a class of location problems. Geographical Analysis 5 (1973) 145-155
8. Margules C.R., and Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 (2000) 243-253
9. Pressey R.L., Possingham H.P., and Margules C.R. Optimality in reserve selection algorithms. when does it matter and how much?. Biological Conservation 76 (1996) 259-267
10. Csuti B., Polasky S., Williams P.H., Pressey R.L., Camm J.D., Kershaw M., et al. A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological Conservation 80 (1997) 83-97
11. Rodrigues A.S.L., and Gaston K.J. Optimization in reserve selection procedures-why not?. Biological Conservation 107 (2002) 123-129
12. Önal H. First-best, second-best, and heuristic solutions in conservation reserve site selection. Biological Conservation 115 (2003) 55-62
13. Bedward M., Pressey R.L., and Smith D.A. A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks. addressing efficiency, reserve design, and land suitability with iterative analysis. Biological Conservation 62 (1992) 115-125
14. Williams J.C., ReVelle C.S., and Levin S.A. Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2 2 (2004) 98-105
15. Kareiva P., and Wennergren U. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373 (1995) 299-302
16. Dunning J.B., Stewart D.J., Danielson B.J., Noon B.R., Root T.L., Lamberson R.H., et al. Spatially explicit population models. current forms and future uses. Ecological Applications 5 1 (1995) 3-11
17. Chave J., Wiegand K., and Levin S. Spatial and biological aspects of reserve design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 2 (2002) 115-122
18. Williams P.H., and Araujo M.B. Apples, oranges, and probabilities. integrating multiple factors into biodiversity conservation with consistency. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 2 (2002) 139-151
19. Cabeza M., and Moilanen A. Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16 5 (2004) 242-248
20. Briers R.A. Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biological Conservation 103 (2002) 77-83
21. Earn D.J.D., Levin S.A., and Rohani P. Coherence and conservation. Science 290 (2000) 1360-1364
22. Shafer C.L. Inter-reserve distance. Biological Conservation 100 (2001) 215-227
23. Rothley K.D. Designing bioreserve networks to satisfy multiple, conflicting demands. Ecological Applications 9 3 (1999) 741-750
24. Nalle D.J., Arthur J.L., and Sessions J. Designing compact and contiguous reserve networks with a hybrid heuristic algorithm. Forest Science 48 1 (2002) 59-68
25. Nalle D.J., Arthur J.L., Montgomery C.A., and Sessions J. Economic and spatial impacts of an existing reserve network on future augmentation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 2 (2002) 99-105
26. Onal H., and Briers R.A. Incorporating spatial criteria in optimum reserve network selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269 (2002) 2437-2441
27. Williams JC. Modeling connectivity in optimal reserve site selection, in review.
28. Hof J., and Flather C.H. Accounting for connectivity and spatial correlation in the optimal placement of wildlife habitat. Ecological Modelling 88 (1996) 143-155
29. Rothley K.D. Dynamically-based criteria for the identification of optimal bioreserve networks. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 2 (2002) 123-128
30. Hof J., Bevers M., Uresk D.W., and Schenbeck G.L. Optimizing habitat location for black-tailed prairie dogs in southwestern South Dakota. Ecological Modelling 147 (2002) 11-21
31. Erkut E., ReVelle C., and Ulkusal Y. Integer-friendly formulations for the r-separation problem. European Journal of Operational Research 92 (1996) 342-351
32. Murray A.T., and Church R.L. Facets for node packing. European Journal of Operational Research 101 (1997) 598-608
33. Murray A.T., and Church R.L. Analyzing cliques for imposing adjacency restrictions in forest models. Forest Science 42 2 (1996) 166-175
34. McDill M.E., and Braze J. Comparing adjacency constraint formulations for randomly generated forest planning problems with four age-class distributions. Forest Science 46 3 (2000) 423-436
35. Pond Action, The Oxfordshire pond survey: a report to the world wide fund for nature (WWF-UK), vol. 1. Oxford: Pond Action; 1994a.
36. Pond Action, The Oxfordshire pond survey: a report to the world wide fund for nature (WWF-UK), vol. 2 (appendices). Oxford: Pond Action; 1994b.
37. ReVelle C.S. Facility siting and integer-friendly programming. European Journal of Operational Research 65 (1993) 147-158
38. Church R.L., Stoms D.M., and Davis F.W. Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation 76 (1996) 105-112
39. Camm J.D., Polasky S., Solow A., and Csuti B. A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection. Biological Conservation 78 (1996) 353-355
40. Church R., and ReVelle C. The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association 32 (1974) 101-118
41. Pressey R.L., and Cowling R.M. Reserve selection algorithms and the real world. Conservation Biology 15 1 (2001) 275-277