Selecting compact habitat reserves for species with differential habitat size needs

Computers and Operations Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 475-487

  Marianov, Vladimir ^a   ReVelle, Charles ^a   Snyder, Stephanie ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Habitat protection; Integer programming; Multiobjective programming; Species preservation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

HABITAT PROTECTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; SPECIES PRESERVATION;

ECOSYSTEMS;

EID: 34447093411     PISSN: 03050548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kirkpatrick J. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25 (1983) 127-134
2. Margules C., Nicholls A., and Pressey R. Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43 (1988) 63-76
3. Underhill L. Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biological Conservation 35 (1994) 85-87
4. Possingham H., Day J., Goldfinch M., and Salzborn F. The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation. In: Sutton D., Cousins E., and Pierce C. (Eds). Decision Sciences: tools for today. Proceedings of the 12th Australian Operations Research conference (1993), ASOR, Adelaide 536-545
5. Toregas C., and ReVelle C. Binary logic solutions to a class of location problems. Geographical Analysis 5 (1973) 145-155
6. Church R., and ReVelle C. The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association 32 (1974) 101-118
7. Camm J., Polasky S., Solow A., and Csuti B. A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection. Biological Conservation 78 (1996) 353-355
8. Cocks K., and Baird I. Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Biological Conservation 49 2 (1989) 113-130
9. Church R., Stoms D., and Davis F. Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation 76 (1996) 105-112
10. Csuti B., Polasky S., Williams P., Pressey R., Camm J., Kershaw M., Kiester R., Downs B., Hamilton R., Huso M., and Sahr K. A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in oregon. Biological Conservation 80 1 (1997) 83-97
11. Rosing K., ReVelle C., and Williams J. Maximizing species representation under limited heuristics: a new and efficient heuristic. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 91-98
12. Arthur J., Hachey K., Sahr K., Huso M., and Kiester A. Finding all optimal solutions to the reserve site selection problem: formulation and computational analysis. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4 2 (1997) 153-165
13. ReVelle C., Williams J., and Boland J. Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 2 (2002) 71-80
14. Kunin W.E. Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts: implications for reserve design. Biological Conservation 82 (1997) 369-377
15. Pressey R.L., and Logan V.S. Size of selection units for future reserves and its influence on actual versus targeted representation of features: a case study in western New South Wales. Biological Conservation 85 (1998) 305-319
16. Bassett S.D., and Edwards Jr. T.C. Effect of different sampling schemes on the spatial placement of conservation reserves in Utah, USA. Biological Conservation 113 (2003) 141-151
17. Ando A., Camm J., Polasky S., and Solow A. Species distributions, land values and efficient conservation. Science 279 (1998) 2126-2128
18. Polasky S., Camm J., and Garber-Yonts B. Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in oregon. Land Economics 77 1 (2001) 68-78
19. Snyder S., Tyrrell L., and Haight R. An optimization approach to selecting research natural areas in national forests. Forest Science 45 3 (1999) 458-469
20. Haight R., ReVelle C., and Snyder S. An integer optimization approach to the probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Operations Research 48 5 (2000) 697-708
21. Arthur J., Haight R., Montgomery C., and Polasky S. Analysis of the threshold and expected coverage approaches to the probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 81-89
22. Church R., Gerrard R., Hollander A., and Stoms D. Understanding the tradeoffs between site quality and species presence in reserve site selection. Forest Science 46 2 (2000) 157-167
23. Church R., Stoms D., Davis F., and Okin B. Planning management activities to protect biodiversity with a GIS and an integrated optimization model. Proceedings of the third international conference/workshop on Integrating GIS and environmental modelling (1996), National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA
24. Fischer D., and Church R. Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. Forest Science 49 4 (2003) 555-565
25. Nalle D., Arthur J., and Sessions J. Designing compact and contiguous reserve networks with a hybrid heuristic algorithm. Forest Science 48 1 (2002) 59-68
26. McDonnell M., Possingham H., Ball I., and Cousins E. Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 107-114
27. Williams J.C., and ReVelle C. Reserve assemblage of critical areas: a zero-one programming approach. European Journal of Operational Research 104 (1998) 497-509