Suppression of bridge flutter using tuned mass dampers based on robust performance design

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Volumn 92, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 919-934

  Kwon, Soon Duck ^a   Park, Kwan Soon ^b  

^a Chonbuk National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aerodynamic uncertainty; Flutter; Robust performance; TMD; Vibration control

Indexed keywords

DAMPING; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); FREQUENCIES; OPTIMIZATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; SUSPENSION BRIDGES; WIND POWER;

BRIDGE FLUTTER; FREQUENCY DRIFT; TUNED MASS DAMPERS (TMD);

AERODYNAMICS;

AERODYNAMIC FORCE; BRIDGE; DAMPER; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; FLUTTER; VIBRATION DAMPING;

EID: 3442901681     PISSN: 01676105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Den Hartog J.P. Mechanical Vibrations 4th Edition 1956 McGraw-Hill New York
2. Rowbottom M.D. The optimization of mechanical dampers to control self-excited galloping oscillations J. Sound Vibration 75 1981 559-576
3. Warburton G.B. Optimum absorber parameters for various combination of response and excitation parameters J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 10 1982 381-401
4. H. Yamaguchi, A few remarks on optimum design of tuned mass damper, Proceedings of the Third East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, 1991, pp. 1413-1418.
5. Iwanami K. Seto K. Optimum design of dual tuned mass dampers and their effectiveness Proc. JSME(C) 50 449 1984 44-52 (in Japanese)
6. Igusa T. Xu K. Wide-band response characteristics of multiple subsystem with high modal density 1990 Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Stochastic and Structural Dynamics Florida
7. Yamaguchi H. Harnpornchai N. Fundamental characteristics of multiple tuned mass dampers for suppressing harmonically forced oscillations Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 22 1993 51-62
8. Abe M. Fujino Y. Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23 1994 813-835
9. Kareem A. Kline S. Performance of multiple mass dampers under random loading J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 121 1995 348-361
10. Li C. Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for attenuating undesirable oscillations of structures under the ground acceleration Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29 2000 1405-1421
11. Miyata T.'et al. Akashi Kaikyo Bridge: wind effects and full model wind tunnel tests Larsen A. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Aerodynamics of Large Bridges 1992 217-236 Balkema
12. Larsen A. Svensson E. Andersen H. Design aspects of tuned mass dampers for the Great Belt East Bridge approach spans J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 54-55 1995 413-426
13. Conti E. Grillaud G. Jacob J. Cohen N. Wind effects on the Normandie cable-stayed bridge: comparison between full aeroelastic model tests and quasi-steady analytical approach J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 65 1996 189-201
14. Gu M. Chen S.R. Chang C.C. Parametric study on multiple tuned mass dampers for buffeting control of Yangpu Bridge J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 89 2001 987-1000
15. Nobuto J. Fujino Y. Ito M. A study on the effectiveness of TMD to suppress a coupled flutter of bridge deck Proc. Japan Soc. Civil Eng. 398 I-10 1989 413-416 (in Japanese)
16. Gu M. Chang C.C. Wu W. Xiang H.F. Increase of critical flutter wind speed of long-span bridges using tuned mass dampers J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 73 1998 111-123
17. Pourzeynali S. Datta T.K. Control of flutter of suspension bridge deck using TMD Wind Struct. 5 2002 407-422
18. Kwon S.-D. Discussion on control of flutter of suspension bridge deck using TMD Wind Struct. 5 2002 563-567
19. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning 1989 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
20. Holland J.H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems 1975 University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor
21. Simiu E. Scanlan R.H. Wind Effects on Structures 1996 Wiley New York
22. Kwon S.-D. Chang S.-P. Suppression of flutter and gust response of bridges using actively controlled edge surfaces J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 88 2000 263-281
23. Singh M.P. Moreschi L.M. Optimal placement of dampers for passive response control Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 2002 955-976
24. Arfiadi Y. Hadi M.S. Passive and active control of three-dimensional buildings Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29 2000 377-396
25. Tsujioka K. Kajiwara I. Nagamatsu A. Integrated optimum design of structure and control system AIAA J. 34 1996 159-165
26. Rajeev S. Krishnamoorthy C.S. Discrete optimization of structures using genetic algorithms J. Struct. Eng. 118 1992 1233-1250
27. Scanlan R.H. Jones N.P. Aerodynamic and aeroelastic studies for the Seohae Grand Bridge in its fully erected condition, Report 1997 Johns Hopkins University