Enhanced Kondo effect via tuned orbital degeneracy in a spin 1/2 artificial atom

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Sasaki, S ^a   Amaha, S ^b   Asakawa, N ^b   Eto, M ^c   Tarucha, S ^a,b,d  

^a Kashino Diverse Brain Research Laboratory of NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FUNCTIONS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; QUANTUM THEORY; SEMICONDUCTING INDIUM COMPOUNDS; TUNNEL DIODES;

ANDERSON IMPURITY MODEL; KONDO EFFECT; KONDO TEMPERATURE; ORBITAL DEGENERACY;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 3442899036     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.017205     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. J. Kondo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 32, 37 (1964).
2. D. Goldhaber-Gordon et al., Nature (London) 391, 156 (1998).
3. S. M. Cronenwett et al., Science 281, 540 (1998).
4. D. Goldhaber-Gordon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5225 (1998).
5. J. Schmid et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 256B-2S8B, 182 (1998).
6. F. Simmel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 804 (1999).
7. J. Schmid et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5824 (2000).
8. S. Sasaki et al., Nature (London) 405, 764 (2000).
9. M. Eto and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1306 (2000); M. Eto and Yu. V Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 85 322 (2001).
10. M. Eto and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1306 (2000); M. Eto and Yu. V Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 85 322 (2001).
11. M. Eto and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 66, 153319 (2002).
12. M. Pustilnik, Y. Avishai, and K. Kikoin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1756 (2000).
13. M. Pustilnik and L. I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2993 (2000); M. Pustilnik and L. I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B 64, 045328 (2001).
14. M. Pustilnik and L. I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2993 (2000); M. Pustilnik and L. I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B 64, 045328 (2001).
15. D. Giuliano and A. Tagliacozzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4677 (2000).
16. D. Giuliano et al., Phys. Rev. B 63, 125318 (2001).
17. W. Izumida et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 216803 (2001).
18. A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1993).
19. For previous work of the multi-orbital Kondo effect in quantum dots, see T. Inoshita et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 14725 (1993); T. Pohjola et al., Europhys. Lett. 40, 189 (1997); W. Izumida et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2444 (1998); A. Levy Yeyati et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 600 (1999).
20. For previous work of the multi-orbital Kondo effect in quantum dots, see T. Inoshita et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 14725 (1993); T. Pohjola et al., Europhys. Lett. 40, 189 (1997); W. Izumida et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2444 (1998); A. Levy Yeyati et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 600 (1999).
21. For previous work of the multi-orbital Kondo effect in quantum dots, see T. Inoshita et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 14725 (1993); T. Pohjola et al., Europhys. Lett. 40, 189 (1997); W. Izumida et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2444 (1998); A. Levy Yeyati et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 600 (1999).
22. For previous work of the multi-orbital Kondo effect in quantum dots, see T. Inoshita et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 14725 (1993); T. Pohjola et al., Europhys. Lett. 40, 189 (1997); W. Izumida et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2444 (1998); A. Levy Yeyati et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 600 (1999).
23. S. Tarucha et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3613 (1996).
24. V. Fock, Z. Phys. 47, 446 (1928); C. G. Darwin, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 27, 86 (1930).
25. V. Fock, Z. Phys. 47, 446 (1928); C. G. Darwin, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 27, 86 (1930).
26. S. Tarucha et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2485 (2000).
27. M. Stopa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 046601 (2003), and references therein.
28. L. I. Glazman and M. Pustilnik, in New Directions in Mesoscopic Physics, NATO ASI (Kluwer, Erice, 2002).
29. W. G. van der Wiel et al., Science 289, 2105 (2000).
30. T. A. Costi and A. C. Hewson, Philos. Mag. B 65, 1165 (1992).
31. ± being addition and extraction energies.
32. K(Δ).
33. An equivalent situation to our SU(4) model has been examined for a double quantum dot system without interdot tunnel coupling; L. Borda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 026602 (2003).
34. K. Yamada et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 71, 450 (1984).