Standing-wave oscillations in binary mixture convection: From the onset via symmetry breaking to period doubling into chaos

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 25 I, 2004, Pages

  Matura, P ^a   Jung, D ^a   Lucke M ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CHAOS THEORY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; HYDRODYNAMICS; MIXTURES; OSCILLATIONS; STANDING WAVE METERS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

BINARY MIXTURE CONVECTION; REYLEIGH NUMBER; STANDING WAVES; WAVE NUMBERS;

HEAT CONVECTION;

EID: 3442888525     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.254501     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993); and references, e.g., in [2,3].
2. M. Lücke, W. Barten, P. Büchel, C. Fütterer, St. Hollinger, and Ch. Jung, in Evolution of Spontaneous Structures in Dissipative Continuous Systems, edited by F. H. Busse and S. C. Müller, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. M55 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998), p. 127.
3. C. Fütterer and M. Lücke, Phys. Rev. E 65, 036315 (2002).
4. For 5 wt % of ethanol mixed into water at T = 20 °C, the separation ratio measuring the Soret coupling strength is ψ≃-0.3.
5. R. Heinrichs, G. Ahlers, and D. S. Cannell, Phys. Rev. A 35, 2761 (1987) ; K. Lerman, D.S. Cannell, and G. Ahlers, Phys. Rev. E 59, 2975 (1999).
6. R. Heinrichs, G. Ahlers, and D. S. Cannell, Phys. Rev. A 35, 2761 (1987) ; K. Lerman, D.S. Cannell, and G. Ahlers, Phys. Rev. E 59, 2975 (1999).
7. K. E. Anderson and R. R Behringer, Physica (Amsterdam) 51D, 444 (1991).
8. B. L. Winkler and P. Kolodner, J. Fluid Mech. 240, 31 (1992); P. Kolodner, Phys. Rev. E 50, 2731 (1994).
9. B. L. Winkler and P. Kolodner, J. Fluid Mech. 240, 31 (1992); P. Kolodner, Phys. Rev. E 50, 2731 (1994).
10. H. Touiri, J. K Platten, and G. Chavepeyer, Eur. J. Mech. B 15, 241 (1996).
11. E. Moses, J. Fineberg, and V. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. A 35, 2757 (1987); E. Kaplan, E. Kuznetsov, and V. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3712 (1994).
12. E. Moses, J. Fineberg, and V. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. A 35, 2757 (1987); E. Kaplan, E. Kuznetsov, and V. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3712 (1994).
13. CM. Surko, D.R. Ohlsen, S.Y. Yamamoto, and P. Kolodner, Phys. Rev. A 43, 7101 (1991); CM. Aegerter and C. M. Surko, Phys. Rev. E 63, 46301 (2001).
14. CM. Surko, D.R. Ohlsen, S.Y. Yamamoto, and P. Kolodner, Phys. Rev. A 43, 7101 (1991); CM. Aegerter and C. M. Surko, Phys. Rev. E 63, 46301 (2001).
15. L. Z. Ning, Y Harada, and H. Yahata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 98, 551 (1997).
16. O. Batiste, E. Knobloch, I. Mercader, and M. Net, Phys. Rev. E 65, 016303 (2001).
17. D. Jung and M. Lücke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 054502 (2002).
18. W. Schöpf and W. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. E 47, 1739 (1993).
19. R depend on ω*.
20. J.W. Swift and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 705 (1984).