The feasibility of evaluating a tobacco control intervention for working youth

Tobacco Control

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2003, Pages

  Fagan, P ^a,b   Stoddard, A M ^c   Hunt, M K ^d   Frazier, L ^e   Girod, K ^d   Sorensen, G ^f  

^a MSC 7337 ^*  (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^d DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EMPLOYMENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; SMOKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; COMMERCE; EMPLOYMENT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASSACHUSETTS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PREVALENCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 3442880621     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: cancer and chronic lung disease in the workplace. A report of the Surgeon General, 1985. Rockville, Maryland: Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health, 1985; (DHHS Publication No (CDC) 85-50207).
2. Covey LS, Zang EA, Wynder EL. Cigarette smoking and occupational status: 1997 to 1990. Am J Public Health 1992;82:1230-4.
3. Shopland DR, Hartman AM, Gibson JT, et al. Cigarette smoking among U.S. adults by state and region: estimates from the Current Population Survey. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1748-58.
4. Ericksen MP, Gottlieb NH. A review of the health impact of smoking control at the workplace. Am J Health Promot 1998;13:83-104.
5. Fisher E, Glasgow R, Terborg J. Worksite smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of long term quit rates from controlled studies. J Occup Med 1990;32:429-39.
6. Sorensen G, Lando H, Pechacek TF. Promoting smoking cessation at the workplace: Results of a randomized controlled intervention study. J Occup Med 1993;35:121-6.
7. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among young people. A report of the Surgeon General, 1994. Atlanta, Georgia: Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health, 1994; (US Government Printing Office Publication No S/N 017-001-00491-0).
8. Greenberger A, Steinberg L, Vaux A. Adolescents who work: health and behavioral consequences of job stress. Dev Psychol 1981;17:691-703.
9. Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. JAMA 1997;278:823-32.
10. Stanton W, Oei T, Silva P. Socio-demographic characteristics of adolescent smokers. Int J Addict 1994;29:913-25.
11. Valois RF, Dunham ACA, Jackson KL, et al. Association between employment and substance abuse behavior among public high school adolescents. J Adolesc Health 1999;25:256-63.
12. Bachman J, Schulenberg J. How part-time work intensity relates to drug use, problem behavior, time use and satisfaction among high school seniors: are these consequences or merely correlates? Dev Psychol 1993;29:220-35.
13. Borland R, Chapman S, Owen N, et al. Effects of workplace smoking bans on cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health 1990;80:178-80.
14. Bachman JG, Schelenberg J. Part-time work by high school seniors: sorting out correlates and possible consequences. Monitoring the Future occasional paper 32. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1992.
15. Light A. High school employment. National longitudinal survey discussion paper. Washington DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, 1995.
16. Steinberg L, Cauffman E. The impact of employment on adolescent development. Ann Child Dev 1995;11:131-66.
17. National Research Council IoM. Protecting youth at work: health safety and development of working children and adolescents in the United States. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1998.
18. US Department of Labor. Report on the American workforce. Washington DC: US Department of Labor, Office of Publications and Special Studies, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1999.
19. US Department of Labor. Report on the youth labor force. Washington DC: US Department of Labor, Office of Publications and Special Studies, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2000.
20. Greenwald P, Cullen JW. A scientific approach to cancer control. Cancer 1984;25:236-44.
21. Flay BR. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med 1986;15:451-74.
22. Sorensen G, Fagan P, Hunt MK, et al. Changing channels for tobacco control with youth: Intervening with teens at work. Health Education Research (in press).
23. Hunt MK, Fagan P, Lederman R, et al. Feasibility of implementing intervention methods in an adolescent worksite tobacco control study. Tobacco Control 2003;12(suppl IV):iv40-5.
24. Patron GC, Carlin JB, Coffey C, et al. The course of early smoking: a populations based cohort study over three years. Addiction 1998;93:1251-60.
25. Schofield P, Borland R, Hill D, et al. Instability in smoking patterns among school leavers in Victoria, Australia. Tobacco Control 1998;7:149-55.
26. Wolfinger R, O'Connell M. Generalized linear models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 1993;48:233-43.
27. SAS Institute Inc. SAS For Windows, Release 8.01. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc, 1999-2000.
28. Martinson BC, Lazovich D, Lando HA, et al. Effectiveness of monetary incentives for recruiting adolescents to an intervention trial to reduce smoking. Prev Med 2000;31:706-13.
29. Farkas AJ, Gilpin EA, White MM, et al. Association between household and workplace smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking. JAMA 2000;284:717-22.