Fermi-Ulam accelerator model under scaling analysis

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Leonel, Edson D ^a   McClintock, P V E ^a   Da Silva, J Kamphorst Leal ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CHAOS THEORY; HAMILTONIANS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUANTUM THEORY; SET THEORY; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

ENERGY GAIN; FERMI ACCELERATION; SCALING ANALYSIS;

FERMI LEVEL;

EID: 3442880122     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.014101     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. E. Fermi, Phys. Rev. 75, 1169 (1949).
2. A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol. 38 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992).
3. M. A. Lieberman and A. J. Lichtenberg, Phys. Rev. A 5, 1852 (1971).
4. L. D. Pustilnikov, Theor. Math. Phys. 57, 1035 (1983); Sov. Math. Dokl. 35, 88 (1987); Russ. Acad. Sci. Sb. Math. 82, 231 (1995).
5. L. D. Pustilnikov, Theor. Math. Phys. 57, 1035 (1983); Sov. Math. Dokl. 35, 88 (1987); Russ. Acad. Sci. Sb. Math. 82, 231 (1995).
6. L. D. Pustilnikov, Theor. Math. Phys. 57, 1035 (1983); Sov. Math. Dokl. 35, 88 (1987); Russ. Acad. Sci. Sb. Math. 82, 231 (1995).
7. A. J. Lichtenberg, M. A. Lieberman, and R. H. Cohen, Physica (Amsterdam) 1D, 291 (1980).
8. G. Karner, J. Stat. Phys. 77, 867 (1994).
9. S. T. Dembinski, A. J. Makowski, and P. Peplowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1093 (1993).
10. J. V. José and R. Cordery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 290 (1986).
11. Z. J. Kowalik, M. Franaszek, and P. Pieranski, Phys. Rev. A 37, 4016 (1988).
12. S. Warr, W. Cooke, R. C. Ball, and J. M. Huntley, Physica (Amsterdam) 231A, 551 (1996).
13. N. Saitô, H. Hirooka, J. Ford, F. Vivaldi, and G. H. Walker, Physica (Amsterdam) 5D, 273 (1982).
14. E. Canale, R. Markarian, S. O. Kamphorst, and S. P. de Carvalho, Physica (Amsterdam) 115D, 189 (1998).
15. A. Loskulov, A. B. Ryabov, and L. G. Akinshin, J. Phys. A 33, 7973 (2000).
16. A.-L. Barabási and H. E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985).
17. J. L. Mateos and J. V. José, Physica (Amsterdam) 257A, 434 (1998).
18. J. L. Mateos, Phys. Lett. A 256, 113 (1999).
19. G. A. Luna-Acosta, G. Orellana-Rivadeneyra, A. Mendoza-Galván, and C. Jung, Chaos Solitons Fractals 12, 349 (2001).
20. E. D. Leonel and J. K. L. da Silva, Physica (Amsterdam) 323A, 181 (2003).
21. M. V. Berry, Eur. J. Phys. 2, 91 (1981).
22. M. Robnik and M. V. Berry, J. Phys. A 18, 1361 (1985).
23. The simplified FUM was introduced by Lichtenberg and Lieberman and can be found, e.g., in Ref. [2].
24. E. D. Leonel, J. K. L. da Silva, and S. O. Kamphorst, Physica (Amsterdam) 331A, 435 (2004).
25. We have used the same notation as the original work [2] although, at that time, stochasticity was frequently referred as to chaotic behavior. However, we stress that the transition is from locally to globally chaotic behavior. In the FUM, we mean by locally that the chaotic behavior is confined by two different invariant spanning curves.