Expenditure, Donations and Public Funding under the United Kingdom’s Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000—And Beyond?

Party Funding and Campaign Financing in International Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 35-56

  Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347406888     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. ‘British Social Attitudes/British Election Surveys and Electoral Commission’ The General Election 2001 (London, Politicos, 2001).
2. P Webb, The Modern British Party System (Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2000) 238–9.
3. Michael Crick, Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL), The Funding of Political Parties in the United Kingdom (Cm 4057-I, 1998) 184
4. KD Ewing, The Funding of Political Parties in Britain (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987).
5. O’Leary, Elimination of Corrupt Practices in British Elections 1868–1911 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1961).
6. M Linton, ‘The Funding of Political Parties’, in R Blackburn(ed), The Electoral System in Britain (London, Longmans, 1999) at 55–6.
7. D Butler and D Kavanagh, The Election of 1997 (Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1997) at 205
8. DE Butler, ‘Elections: Legislation and Litigation’, in DE Butler (ed), The Law, Politics and the Constitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 175–7
9. P Webb, The Modern British Party System (Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2000) 236–7.
10. MJ Malbin and TL Gais, The Day After Reform:Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons From the American States (Albany, NY; Rockefeller Institute Press, 1998).
11. Neill Committee’s report, The Funding of Political Parties in Britain (Cm 4057, 1998)
12. Fourth Report of the Public Administration Select Committee (HC (2000–1) No 264)
13. KD Ewing, The Funding of Political Parties in Britain (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987) 77–80.
14. NS Ghaleigh, ‘The Funding of Political Parties in the United Kingdom: the Case for Cherry Picking’ (1999) Public Law 43–50.
15. CSPL The Funding of Political Parties in the United Kingdom (Cm 4413, 1999).
16. C Chataway, Agenda for Change: Report of the Hansard Society Commission on Electoral Campaigns (London, Hansard Society, 1991)
17. P Nairn, Report of the Commission on the Conduct of Referendums (London, Constitution Unit, 1996)
18. Constitutional Commission, Establishing an Electoral Commission (London, Constitution Unit, 1997);
19. DE Butler, Keeping Election Law Up-to-Date: The Case for an Electoral Commission (London, Hansard Society, 1998).
20. T Potter, The Internet and Federal Election Law, http://www. brook.edu/gs/cf/headlines/internet.htm last accessed 23 April 2005.
21. D Morris, Behind the Oval Office: Winning the Presidency in the Nineties (New York, Random House, 1997)
22. R Dworkin, The Curse of American Politics, The New York Review of Books, 17 October 1996.
23. M Pinto-Duschinsky, ‘Financing Politics: A Global View’ (2002)13:4 Journal of Democracy 69–86.
24. BE Cain, ‘Moralism and Realism in Campaign Finance Reform’ (1995) University of Chicago Legal Forum, 111
25. BD Brown, ‘Alien Donors: The Participation of Non-Citizens in the US Campaign Finance System’ (1997) 15 Yale Law and Policy Review 530.
26. J Gray, Politics and Companies (1999) 20 The Company Lawyer 275–6.