Neural mechanisms of the time-order error: An MEG study

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1163-1174

  Hairston, Ilana S ^a   Nagarajan, Srikantan S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION METHOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; STANDARD; STIMULUS; TIME ORDER ERROR; TRAINING; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 34347399782     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1163     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allan, L. G. (1977). The time-order error in judgments of duration. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31, 24-31.
2. Allan, L. G. (1979). The perception of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 340-354.
3. Allan, L. G., & Gibbon, J. (1994). A new temporal illusion or TOE once again? (comment). Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 227-229.
4. Gescheider, G. A. (1997). Psychophysics: The fundamentals. London: Erlbaum.
5. Grondin, S. (2001). Discriminating time intervals presented in sequence marked by visual signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1214-1228.
6. Hari, R., Kaila, K., Katila, T., Tuomisto, T., & Varpula, T. (1982). Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: Implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 54, 561-569.
7. Hellström, Å. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 35-61.
8. Hellström, Å. (2001). Time-order effects for aesthetic preference. Leipzig: Pabst Science Publishers.
9. Jääskeläinen, I. P., Ahveninen, J., Bonmassar, G., Dale, A. M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Levänen, S., et al. (2004). Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 101, 6809-6814.
10. Jamieson, D. G., & Petrusic, W. M. (1975). Presentation order effects in duration discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 197-202.
11. Jamieson, D. G., & Petrusic, W. M. (1976). On a bias induced by the provision of feedback in psychophysical. Acta Psychologica, 40, 199-206.
12. Jamieson, D. G., & Petrusic, W. M. (1978). Feedback versus an illusion in time. Perception, 7, 91-96.
13. Janata, P., & Grafton, S. T. (2003). Swinging in the brain: Shared neural substrates for behaviors related to sequencing and music. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 682-687.
14. Koh, S. D. (1967). Time-error in comparisons of preferences for musical excerpts. American Journal of Psychology, 80, 171-185.
15. Lammertmann, C., Fijiki, N., Lütkenhöner, B., & Hari, R. (2000). Short-term decrement of the auditory N1m response. Paper presented at the BIOMAG, Helsinki, Finland.
16. McAngus, N. T., Lee, C., & O'Boyle, D. (2002). A sensorimotor theory of temporal tracking and beat induction. Psychological Research, 66, 26-29.
17. Näätänen, R., Jacobson, T., & Winkler, I. (2004). Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 42, 25-32.
18. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425.
19. Nakajima, Y., ten Hoopen, G., Sasaki, T., Yamamoto, K., Kadota, M., Simons, M., et al. (2004). Time shrinking: The process of unilateral temporal assimilation. Perception, 33, 1061-1079.
20. Needham, J. G. (1934). The time-error as a function of continued experimentation. American Journal of Psychology, 46, 558-567.
21. Needham, J. G. (1935). The effect of the interval upon the time-error at different intensive levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 539-543.
22. Neisser, G. (2002). Wolfgang Köhler, 1887-1967. Biographical Memoirs, 81, 1-13.
23. Penhune, V. B., Zatorre, R. J., & Feindel, W. H. (1999). The role of auditory cortex in retention of rhythmic patterns as studied in patients with temporal lobe removals including Heschls gyrus. Neuropsychologia, 37, 315-331.
24. Platel, H., Price, C., Baron, J. C., Wise, R., Lambert, R. S., Frackowial, R. S., et al. (1997). The structural components of music perception. A functional anatomical study. Brain, 120, 229-243.
25. Postman, L. (1946). The time-error in auditory perception. American Journal of Psychology, 59, 193-219.
26. Sasaki, T., Suetomi, D., Nakajima, Y., & ten Hoopen, G. (2002). Time-shrinking, its propagation, and Gestalt principles. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 919-931.
27. Shapiro, K., Schmitz, F., Mertens, S., Hommel, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2006). Resource sharing in the attentional blink. NeuroReport, 17, 163-166.
28. Soltani, M., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Neural origins of the P300. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology, 14, 199-224.
29. Stott, L. H. (1935). Time order errors in the discrimination of short tonal durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 741-766.
30. Vos, P. G., Assen, M., & Franek, M. (1997). Perceived tempo change is dependent on base tempo and direction of change: Evidence for a generalized version of Schulze's (1978) internal beat model. Psychological Research, 59, 240-247.
31. Woodrow, H. (1935). The effect of practice upon time-order errors in the comparison of temporal intervals. Psychological Review, 42, 127-152.