Towards a comprehensive structural coverage of completed genomes: A structural genomics viewpoint

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 8, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Marsden, Russell L ^a   Lewis, Tony A ^a   Orengo, Christine A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAIN INSIGHT; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; ORTHOLOGUES; PROTEIN EVOLUTION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS; TARGET SELECTION;

GENES;

PROTEINS;

ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 34347394165     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-86     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Thornton J Structural genomics takes off Trends Biochem Sci 2001, 26:88-89. 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01765-5 11327043
2. Stevens RC Yokoyama S Wilson IA Global efforts in structural genomics Science 2001, 294:89-892. 10.1126/science.1066011 11588249
3. Todd AE Marsden RL Thornton JM Orengo CA Progress of structural genomics initiatives: An analysis of solved target structures J Mol Biol 2005, 348:1235-1260. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.037 15854658
4. Chandonia JM Brenner SE The impact of structural genomics: Expectations and outcomes Science 2006, 311:347-351. 10.1126/science.1121018 16424331
5. Brenner SE Chothia C Hubbard TJP Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 95:6073-6078. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6073
6. Park J Karplus K Barrett C Hughey R Haussler D Hubbard T Chothia C Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods J Mol Biol 1998, 284:1201-1210. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2221 9837738
7. Jones DT GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences J Mol Biol 1999, 287:797-815. 10.1006/ jmbi.1999.2583 10191147
8. Karplus K Barrett C Hughey R Hidden markov models for detecting remote protein homologies Bioinformatics 1998, 14:846-856. 10.1093/ bioinformatics/14.10.846 9927713
9. Sander C Schneider R Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment Proteins 1991, 9:56-68. 10.1002/prot.340090107 2017436
10. Norvell JC Machalek AZ Structural genomics programs at the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences Nature Struct Biol 2000, 7:931. 10.1038/80694 11103990
11. Terwilliger TC Structural genomics in North America Nature Struct Biol 2000, 7:935-939. 10.1038/80700 11103992
12. Sanchez R Pieper U Melo F Eswar N Marti-Renom MA Madhusudhan MS Mirkovic N Sali A Protein structure modeling for structural genomics Nat Struct Biol 2000, 7:986-990. 10.1038/80776 11104007
13. Simons KT Strauss C Baker D Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics J Mol Biol 2001, 306:1191-1199. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4459 11237627
14. Kim SH Shining a light on structural genomics Nature Struct Biol 1998, 5:643-645. 10.1038/1334 9699614
15. Burley SK Almo SC Bonanno JB Capel M Chance MR Gaasterland T Lin D Sali A Studier FW Swaminathan S Structural genomics: Beyond the human genome project Nature Genet 1999, 23:151-157. 10.1038/13783 10508510
16. Burley SK An overview of structural genomics Nature Struct Biol 2000, 7:932-934. 10.1038/80697 11103991
17. Brenner SE A tour of structural genomics Nature Rev Genet 2001, 2:801-809. 10.1038/35093574
18. Stevens RC Yokoyama S Wilson IA Global efforts in structural genomics Science 2001, 294:89-92. 10.1126/science.1066011 11588249
19. Concept Clearance for the PSI-2 Production Phase http://www.nigms.nih.gov/News/Reports/council-psi-sept03.htm
20. Linial M Yona G Methodologies for target selection in structural genomics Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2000, 73:297-320. 10.1016/ S0079-6107(00)00011-0 11063777
21. Chandonia JM Kim SH Brenner SE Target selection and deselection at the Berkeley Structural Genomics Center Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 2006, 62:356-370. 10.1002/prot.20674
22. Grigoriev IV Choi IG Target selection for structural genomics: A single genome approach OMICS 2002, 6:349-362. 10.1089/153623102321112773 12626094
23. Watson JD Todd AE Bray J Laskowski RA Edwards A Joachimiak A Orengo CA Thornton JM Target selection and determination of function in structural genomics IUBMB Life 2003, 55:249-255. 12880206
24. Andreeva A Howorth D Brenner SE Hubbard TJ Chothia C Murzin AG SCOP database in 2004: Refinements integrate structure and sequence family data Nucleic Acids Research 2004, 32:D226-D229. 308773 14681400 10.1093/ nar/gkh039
25. Orengo CA Michie AD Jones S Jones DT Swindells MB Thornton JM CATH - a hierarchical classification of protein domain structures Structure 1997, 5:1093-1108. 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8 9309224
26. Bateman A Coin L Durbin R Finn RD Hollich V Griffiths-Jones S Khanna A Marshall M Moxon S Sonnhammer ELL Studholme DJ Yeats C Eddy SR The Pfam protein families database Nucleic Acids Research 2004, 32:TD138-D141. 10.1093/nar/gkh121
27. Sali A Target practice Nat Struct Biol 2001, 8:482-484. 10.1038/88529 11373610
28. Vitkup D Melamud E Moult J Sander C Completeness in structural genomics Nat Struct Biol 2001, 8:559-566. 10.1038/88640 11373627
29. Liu J Rost B Target space for structural genomics revisited Bioinformatics 2002, 18:922-933. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.7.922 12117789
30. Chandonia JM Brenner SE Implications of structural genomics target selection strategies: Pfam whole genome, and random approaches Proteins 5000, 58:166-179. 10.1002/prot.20298
31. Yan Y Moult J Protein family clustering for structural genomics J Mol Biol 2005, 353:744-759. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.058 16185712
32. Marsden RL Lee D Maibaum M Yeats C Orengo CA Comprehensive genome analysis of 203 genomes provides structural genomics with new insights into protein family space Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34:1066-1080. 1373602 16481312 10.1093/nar/gkj494
33. Baker D Sali A Protein structure prediction and structural genomics Science 2001, 294:93-96. 10.1126/science.1065659 11588250
34. Todd AE Orengo CA Thornton JM Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective J Mol Biol 2001, 307:1113-1143. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4513 11286560
35. Rost B Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated J Mol Biol 2002, 318:595-608. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00016-5 12051862
36. Tian W Skolnick J How well is enzyme function conserved as a function of pairwise sequence identity? J Mol Biol 2003, 333:863-882. 10.1016/ j.jmb.2003.08.057 14568541
37. Sadreyev RI Grishin NV Exploring dynamics of protein structure determination and homology-based prediction to estimate the number of superfamilies and folds BMC Struct Biol 2006, 20:6-6. 10.1186/ 1472-6807-6-6
38. Kim Y Dementieva I Zhou M Wu R Lezondra L Quartey P Joachimiak G Korolev O Li H Joachimiak A Automation of protein purification for structural genomics J Struct Funct Genomics 2004, 5:111-118. 10.1023/ B:JSFG.0000029206.07778.fc 15263850
39. Minor W Cymborowski M Otwinowski Z Chruszcz M HKL-3000: The integration of data reduction and structure solution-from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2006, 62:859-866. 10.1107/S0907444906019949 16855301
40. McPherson A Protein crystallization in the structural genomics era J Struct Funct Genomics 2004, 5:3-12. 10.1023/B:JSFG.0000029199.43875.92 15263838
41. Lesley SA Wilson IA Protein production and crystallization at the joint center for structural genomics J Struct Funct Genomics 2005, 6:71-79. 10.1007/s10969-005-2897-2 16211502
42. Busso D Poussin-Courmontagne P Rose D Ripp R Litt A Thierry JC Moras D Structural genomics of eukaryotic targets at a laboratory scale J Struct Funct Genomics 2005, 6:81-88. 10.1007/s10969-005-1909-6 16211503
43. Liu J Hegyi H Acton TB Montelione GT Rost B Automatic target selection for structural genomics on eukaryotes Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 2004, 56:188-200. 10.1002/prot.20012
44. Reeves GA Dallman TJ Redfern OC Akpor A Orengo CA Structural Diversity of Domain Superfamilies in the CATH Database J Mol Biol 2006, 360:725-741. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.035 16780872
45. Wu CH Apweiler R Bairoch A Natale DA Barker WC Boeckmann B Ferro S Gasteiger E Huang H Lopez R Magrane M Martin MJ Mazumder R O'Donovan C Redaschi N Suzek B The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): An expanding universe of protein information Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34:D187-D191. 1347523 16381842 10.1093/nar/gkj161
46. Letunic I Copley RR Pils B Pinkert S Schultz J Bork P SMART 5: Domains in the context of genomes and networks Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34:D257-D260. 1347442 16381859 10.1093/nar/gkj079
47. Elofsson A Sonnhammer EL A comparison of sequence and structure protein domain families as a basis for structural genomics Bioinformatics 1999, 15:480-500. 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.6.480 10383473
48. Eddy SR Profile hidden Markov models Bioinformatics 1998, 14:755-763. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 9918945
49. Westbrook J Feng Z Chen L Yang H Berman HM The Protein Data Bank and structural genomics Nucl Acids Research 2003, 31:489-491. 10.1093/nar/ gkg068
50. Kersey PJ Morris L Hermjakob H Apweiler R Integr8: Enhanced inter-operability of European molecular biology databases Methods Inf Med 2003, 42:154-160. 12743652
51. Skovgaard M Jensen LJ Brunak S Ussery D Krogh A On the total number of genes and their length distribution in complete microbial genomes Trends Genet 2001, 17:425-428. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02372-1 11485798
52. Siew N Fischer D Analysis of singleton ORFans in fully sequenced microbial genomes Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 2003, 53:241-251. 10.1002/ prot.10423
53. R-sampling CATH superfamilies e http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/sg/ CathReSample.pl
54. Ranea JA Buchan DW Thornton JM Orengo CA Evolution of protein superfamilies and bacterial genome size J Mol Biol 2004, 336:871-887. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.044 15095866
55. Vogel C Chothia C Protein family expansions and biological complexity PLoS Comput Biol 2006, 2:e48. 1464810 16733546 10.1371/ journal.pcbi.0020048
56. Laskowski RA Watson JD Thornton JM From protein structure to biochemical function? J Struct Funct Genomics 2003, 4:167-177. 10.1023/ A:1026127927612 14649301
57. Pearl FMG Lee D Bray JE Buchan DW Shepherd AJ Orengo CA The CATH extended protein-family database: Providing structural annotations for genome sequences Protein Sci 2002, 11:233-244. 10.1110/ps.16802 11790833
58. Enright AJ Van Dongen S Ouzounis CA An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families Nucleic Acids Research 2002, 30:1575-1584. 101833 11917018 10.1093/nar/30.7.1575
59. Jones DT Taylor WR Thornton JM A mutation data matrix for transmembrane proteins FEBS Lett 1994, 339:269-75. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80429-X 8112466
60. Lupas A Van Dyke M Stock J Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences Science 1991, 252:1162-1164. 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162 2031185
61. Wootton JC Federhen S Analysis of computationally biased regions in sequence databases Methods Enzymol 1996, 266:554-571. 8743706