Paraphyly of Paederieae, recognition of Putorieae and expansion of Plocama (Rubiaceae-Rubioideae)

Taxon

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 315-328

  Backlund, Maria ^a,c   Bremer, Birgitta ^b   Thulin, Mats ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Gaillonia; Molecular phylogenetics; Paederieae; Plocama; Putorieae; rbcL; rps16; Rubiaceae; trnT F

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; DNA FINGERPRINTING; PHYLOGENETICS; PLASTID; TAXONOMY;

AFRICA; ATLANTIC ISLANDS; ATLANTIC OCEAN; CANARY ISLANDS; EURASIA; EUROPE; INDIAN OCEAN; INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS; MACARONESIA; MADAGASCAR; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

GAILLONIA; KELLOGGIA; LEPTODERMIS; PAEDERIA; PAEDERIEAE; PLOCAMA; PLOCAMA PENDULA; PUTORIA; RUBIACEAE; RUBIEAE; RUBIOIDEAE; SAPROSMA; SERISSA; SPERMACOCEAE; SPERMADICTYON;

EID: 34347391137     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.562006     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Anderson, C.L., Rova, J.H.E. & Andersson, L. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the tribe Anthospermeae (Rubiaceae): systematic and biogeographic implications. Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 231-244.
2. Andersson, L. & Antonelli, A. 2005. Phylogeny of the tribe Cinchoneae (Rubiaceae), its position in Cinchonoideae, and description of a new genus, Ciliosemina. Taxon 54: 17-28.
3. Andersson, L. & Rova, J.H.E. 1999. The rps16 intron and the phytogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 214: 161-186.
4. Andersson, L., Rova, J.H.E. & Guarin, F.A. 2002. Relationships, circumscription, and biogeography of Arcytophyllum (Rubiaceae) based on evidence from cpDNA. Brittonia 54: 40-49.
5. Andrus, N., Trusty, J., Santos-Guerra, A., Jansen, R.K. & Francisco-Ortega, J. 2004. Using molecular phylogenies to test phytogeographical links between East/South Africa-Southern Arabia and the Macaronesian islands - a review, and the case of Vierea and Pulicaria section Vieraeopsis (Asteraceae). Taxon 53: 333-346.
6. Backlund, M. & Thulin, M. 2007. Revision of the Mediterranean species of Plocama (Rubiaceae). Taxon 56: 516-520.
7. Barquin Diez, E. & Wildpret, W. de la Torre. 1975. Diseminación de plantas canarias. Datos iniciales. Vieraea 5: 38-60.
8. Bramwell, D. & Bramwell, Z. 1974. Wild Flowers of the Canary Islands. Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd., Cheltenham.
9. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1954. Les sous-families et les tribus des Rubiacées. Huitième Congrès International de Botanique, Rapports et Communications, Paris, Sect. 2-6: 113-114.
10. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1966. Remarks on the position, the delimitation and the subdivision of the Rubiaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 15: 1-33.
11. Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogenetic studies within Rubiaceae and relationships to other families based on molecular data. Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 33-50.
12. Bremer, B. 1997. Combined and separate analyses of morphological and molecular data in Rubiaceae. Cladistics 12: 21-40.
13. Bremer, B., Andreasen, K. & Olsson, D. 1995. Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 383-397.
14. Bremer, B., Bremer, K., Heidari, N., Erixon, P., Olmstead, R.G., Anderberg, A.A., Källersjö, M. & Barkhordarian, E. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 24: 274-301.
15. Bremer, B. & Eriksson, O. 1992. Evolution of fruit characters and dispersal modes in the tropical family Rubiaceae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 47: 79-95.
16. Bremer, B. & Manen, J.-F. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 225: 43-72.
17. Bremer, B. & Thulin, M. 1998. Collapse of Isertieae, re-establishment of Mussaendeae, and a new genus of Sabiceeae (Rubiaceae); phylogenetic relationships based on rbcL data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 211: 71-92.
18. Candolle, A.P. de 1830. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, vol. 4. Truettel and Würtz, Paris.
19. Chase, M.W. & Hills, H.H. 1991. Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxon 40: 215-220.
20. Chevet, E., Lemaître, G. & Katinka, M.D. 1995. Low concentrations of tetramethylammonium chloride increase yield and specificity of PCR. Nucl. Acids Res. 23: 3343-3344.
21. Dessein, S., Ochoterena, H., de Block, P., Lens, F., Robbrecht, E., Schols, P., Smets, E., Vinckier, S. & Huysmans, S. 2005. Palynological characters and their phylogenetic signal in Rubiaceae. Bot. Rev. 71: 354-414.
22. Downie, S.R. & Katz-Downie, D.S. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast rps16 intron sequences reveals relationships within the woody southern African Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae. Canad. J. Bot. 77: 1120-1135.
23. Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. Bot. Soc. Amer. 19: 11-15.
24. Ehrendorfer, F. & Schönbeck-Temesy, E. 2005. Gaillonia, Jaubertia, Pterogaillonia. Pp. 22-35 in: Rechinger, W. (ed.), Flora Iranica, vol. 176. Verlag des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, Wien.
25. Halácsy, E. de 1901. Conspectus Florae Graecae, vol. 1, part 3. Engelmann, Leipzig.
26. Hegnauer, R. 1973. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen, vol. 6. Birkhäuser, Basel.
27. Hemsley, W.B. 1882. Aitchisonia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 19: 166-167.
28. Hooker, J.D. 1873. Rubiaceae. Pp. 7-151, in: Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. (eds.), Genera Plantarum, vol. 2. Lovell Reeve, London.
29. Huysmans, S., Dessein, S., Smets, E. & Robbrecht, E. 2003. Pollen morphology of NW European representatives confirms monophyly of Rubieae (Rubiaceae). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 127: 219-240.
30. Igersheim, A. 1991. Palynological investigations of Paederia L. (Rubiaceae-Paederieae). Opera Bot. Belg. 3: 135-149.
31. Jussieu, A.L. de 1789. Genera Plantarum. Herissant et Barrois, Paris.
32. Kapadia, G.J., Shukla, Y.N., Bose, A.K., Fujiwara, H. & Lloyd, H.A. 1979. Revised structure of paederoside, a novel monoterpene S-methyl thiocarbonate. Tetrahedron Lett. 20: 1937-1938.
33. Kelchner, S.A. 2002. Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: Structure, function, and evolutionary constraints. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1651-1669.
34. Kim, K.-J., Jansen, R.K., Wallace, S., Michaels, H.J. & Palmer, J.D. 1992. Phylogenetic implications of rbcL sequence variation in the Asteraceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 428-445.
35. Kornhall, P., Heidari, N. & Bremer, B. 2001. Selagineae and Manuleeae, two tribes or one? Phylogenetic studies in the Scrophulariaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 228: 199-218.
36. Lange, J. 1868. Rubiaceae. Pp. 299-328 in: Willkomm, M. & Lange, J. (eds.), Prodromus Florae Hispanicae seu Synopsis Methodica Omnium Plantarum in Hispania, vol. 2. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.
37. Larsen, K. 1958. Preliminary note on the cytology of the endemic Canarian element. Bot. Tidsskr. 54: 167-169.
38. Linczevski, I. 1973. De genere Gaillonia A. Rich, ex DC. (Rubiaceae). Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 10: 224-236.
39. Léonard, J. 1984. Contribution à la connaissance de la flore de l'Iran. - VI. Le complexe Gaillonia A. Rich, ex DC. (Rubiaceae). Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg. 54: 493-497.
40. Manen, J.F. & Natali, A. 1995. Comparison of the evolution of ribulose-1, 5-biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) and atpB-rbcL noncoding spacer sequences in a recent plant group, the tribe Rubieae (Rubiaceae). J. Molec. Evol. 41: 920-927.
41. Manen, J.F., Natali, A. & Ehrendorfer, F. 1994. Phylogeny of Rubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. Pl. Syst. Evol. 190: 195-211.
42. Mendoza-Heuer, I. 1987. Makaronesische Endemiten: zur Blütenbiologie von Plocama pendula Ait. (Rubiaceae). Bauhinia 8: 235-241.
43. Molina Borja, M. 1986. Notes on the diet of Gallotia stehlini (Fam. Lacertidae) as obtained from behaviour observations. Vieraea 16: 23-26.
44. Natali, A., Manen, J.-F. & Ehrendorfer, F. 1995. Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae-Rubioideae, in particular the tribe Rubieae: evidence from a non-coding chloroplast DNA sequence. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 428-439.
45. Natali, A., Manen, J.-F. & Ehrendorfer, F. 1996. Tribal, generic and specific relationships in the Rubioideae-Rubieae (Rubiaceae) based on sequence data of a cpDNA intergene region. Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 193-203.
46. Nie, Z.-L., Wen, J., Sun, H. & Bartholomew, B. 2005. Monophyly of Kelloggia Torrey ex Benth. (Rubiaceae) and evolution of its intercontinental disjunction between western North America and eastern Asia. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 642-652.
47. Novotny, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S.E., Weiblen, G.D., Bremer, B., Cizek, L. & Drozd, P. 2002. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416: 841-844.
48. Olmstead, R.G., Bremer, B., Scott, K.M. & Palmer, D.J. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 700-722.
49. Olmstead, R.G., Michaels, H.J., Scott, K.M. & Palmer, J.D. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 249-265.
50. Oxelman, B., Backlund, M. & Bremer, B. 1999. Relationships of the Buddlejaceae s.l. investigated using parsimony jack-knife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 24: 164-182.
51. Oxelman, B., Lidén, M. & Berglund, D. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phytogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 393-410.
52. Puff, C. 1982. The delimitation of the tribe Anthospermeae and its affinities to the tribe Paederieae (Rubiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 84: 355-377.
53. Puff, C. (ed.) 1991. The genus Paederia L.: A multidisciplinary study. Opera Bot. Belg. 3.
54. Puff, C. & Mantell, D.E. 1982. The tribal position and affinities of Crocyllis (Rubiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 103: 89-106.
55. Qarar, M. 1973. Die Gattung Gaillonia A. Rich. (Rubiaceae-Anthospermeae) und ihre Differenzierung im Saharo-Sindischen und Irano-Turanischen Raum. Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna.
56. Ritland, K. & Clegg, M.T. 1987. Evolutionary analysis of plant DNA sequences. Amer. Naturalist 130 Supplement (Plant molecular evolution, July 1987): S74-S100.
57. Robbrecht, E. 1982. Pollen morphology of the tribes Anthospermeae and Paederieae (Rubiaceae) in relation to taxonomy. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 52: 349-366.
58. Robbrecht, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belg. 1: 1-271.
59. Robbrecht, E. 1993. Supplement to the 1988 outline of the classification of the Rubiaceae. Index to genera. Opera Bot. Belg. 6: 173-196.
60. Robbrecht, E. & Manen, J.-F. 2006. The major evolutionary lineages of the coffee family (Rubiaceae, angiosperms). Combined analysis (nDNA and cpDNA) to infer the position of Coptosapelta and Luculia, and supertree construction based on rbcL, rps16, trnL-trnF and atpB-rbcL data. A new classification in two subfamilies, Cinchonoideae and Rubioideae. Syst. Geogr. Pl. 76: 85-146.
61. Rova, J.H.E., Delprete, P.G., Andersson, L. & Albert, V.A. 2002. A trnL-F cpDNA sequence study of the Condamineeae-Rondeletieae- Sipaneeae complex with implications on the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 145-159.
62. Schönbeck-Temesy, E. & Ehrendorfer, F. 2005. Aitchisonia, Pseudogaillonia. Pp. 21-22, 45-47, in: Rechinger, W. (ed.), Flora Iranica, vol. 176: 21-22, 45-47. Verlag des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, Wien.
63. Schumann, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. Pp. 1-156, in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 4. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
64. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
65. Struwe, L., Thiv, M., Kadereit, J.W., Pepper, A.-R., Motley, T.J., White, P.J., Rova, J.H.E., Potgieter, K. & Albert, V.A. 1998. Saccifolium (Saccifoliaceae), an endemic of Sierra de la Neblina on the Brazilian-Venezuelan border, is related to a temperate-alpine lineage of Gentianaceae. Harvard Pap. Bot. 3: 199-214.
66. Suzuki, S., Hisamichi, K. & Endo, K. 1993. Nmr studies and structural assignment of paederoside. Heterocycles 35: 895-900.
67. Sweet, R. 1839. Hortus Britannicus, ed. 3. J. Ridgway, London.
68. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer, Sunderland.
69. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109.
70. Takeda, Y., Puff, C., Kondoh, Y. & Yoshioka, Y. 1991. Analysis of iridoid glycosides of Paederia L. species (Rubiaceae-Paederieae) by gaschromatography mass spectrometry. Opera Bot. Belg. 3: 153-158.
71. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D.G. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 4876-4882.
72. Thonner, F. 1908. Die Blütenpflanzen Afrikas, eine Anleitung zum Bestimmen der Gattungen der Afrikanischen Siphonogamen. Friedländer & Sohn, Berlin.
73. Thulin, M. 1998. Gaillonia (Rubiaceae-Paederieae) in Africa and Arabia. Nordic J. Bot. 18: 31-38.
74. Verdcourt, B. 1958. Remarks on the classification of the Rubiaceae. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 28: 209-281.
75. Wallander, E. & Albert, V.A. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of Oleaceae based on rps16 and trnL- F sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1827-1841.
76. Wunderlich, R. 1971. Die systematische Stellung von Theligonum. Österr. Bot. Zeit. 119: 329-394.