On the process of automation transition in multitask human-machine systems

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 586-598

  Hancock, Peter A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b University of Central Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive task allocation; Automation; Dynamic interface display; Multitasking; Perceived workload

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MULTITASKING;

ADAPTIVE TASK ALLOCATION; DYNAMIC INTERFACE DISPLAY; WARNING MODALITY;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 34347382151     PISSN: 10834427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCA.2007.897610     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. C. E. Billings, Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992.
2. R. M. Fitts, Ed., Human Engineering for an Effective Air Navigation and Traffic Control System. Washington, DC: Nat. Res. Council, 1951.
3. N. Jordan, "Allocation of functions between man and machines in automated systems," J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 161-165, 1963.
4. W. B. Rouse, "Adaptive aiding for human/computer control," Hum. Factors, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 431-443, Aug. 1988.
5. W. B. Rouse, "Human-computer interaction in multi-task situations," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. SMC-7, no. 5, pp. 293-300, May 1977.
6. W. B. Rouse, "Twenty years of adaptive aiding: Origins of the concept and lessons learned," in Human Performance in Automated Systems: Current Research and Trends, M. Mouloua and R. Parasuraman, Eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994, pp. 249-255.
7. R. Parasuraman, M. Mouloua, and R. Molloy, "Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems," Hum. Factors, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 665-679, Dec. 1996.
8. P. A. Hancock and S. F. Scallen, "The future of function allocation," Ergon. Des., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 24-29, Oct. 1996.
9. E. L. Weiner and R. E. Curry, "Flight deck automation: Problems and promises," Ergonomics, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 995-1011, 1980.
10. L. Bainbridge, "Ironies of automation," Automatica, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 775-779, 1983.
11. P.A. Hancock, M. H. Chignell, and A. Loewenthal, "KBAM: A prototype knowledge-based adaptive man-machine system," in Proc. 9th Congr. Int. Ergonom. Assoc., I. D. Brown, R. Goldsmith, K. Coombes, and M. A. Sinclair, Eds., Bournemouth, U.K., 1985, pp. 103-105.
12. P. A. Hancock and M. H. Chignell, "Mental workload dynamics in adaptive interface design," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 6474558, Jul./Aug. 1988.
13. D. O'Hare and S. N. Roscoe, Flightdeck Performance: The Human Factor Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ. Press, 1990.
14. E. L. Wiener and D. C. Nagel, Eds., Human Factors in Aviation. New York: Academic, 1989.
15. C. Bubb-Lewis and M. W. Scerbo, "Does desire for control affect interactions in an adaptive automation environment?" in Automation Technology and Human Performance, M. W. Scerbo and M. Mouloua, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999, pp. 124-128.
16. L. J. Prinzel, E G. Freeman, M. W. Scerbo, P. J. Mikulka, and A. T. Pope, "A closed-loop system for examining psycho-physiological measures for adaptive task allocation," Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 393-410, 2001.
17. A. T. Pope, E. H. Bogart, and D. S. Bartolome, "Biocybernetic system validates index of operator engagement in automated task," Biol. Psychol., vol. 40, no. 1/2, pp. 187-195, 1995.
18. R. Parasuraman, "Effects of adaptive function allocation on human performance," in Proc. FAA/NASA Conf. Artif. Intell. and Human Factors Air Traffic Control and Aviation Maintenance, Daytona Beach, FL, 1993, pp. 147-157.
19. C. E. Billings and D. D. Woods, "Concerns about adaptive automation in aviation systems," in Human Performance in Automated Systems: Research and Trends, M. Mouloua and R. Parasuraman, Eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994, pp. 264-269.
20. R. Parasuraman, M. Mouloua, R. Molloy, and B. Hilburn, "The adaptive function allocation for intelligent cockpits (AFAIC) program: Interim research and guidelines for the application of adaptive automation," Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, PA, Tech. Rep., 1993.
21. T. B. Sheridan, Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues. Santa Monica, CA: Wiley, 2000.
22. J. G. Morrison and J. P. Gluckman, "Preliminary program plan for the adaptive function allocation for intelligent cockpits (AFAIC) program," Naval Air Develop. Center, Westminster, PA, Tech. Rep., 1991.
23. M. W. Scerbo, "Theoretical perspectives on automation," in Automation and Human Performance, R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996, pp. 37-63.
24. D. B. Kaber, J. M Riley, K. W. Tan, and M. R. Endsley, "On the design of adaptive automation for complex systems," Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 37-57, 2001.
25. P. A. Hancock, J. A. Duley, and S. F. Scallen, "The control of adaptive function allocation," Univ. Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Tech. Rep., HFRL, No. 6, 1994.
26. P. A. Hancock, "The effects of automation invocation procedure and dynamic display relocation on performance in a multi-task environment," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 47-57, 2007.
27. N. Sarter and B. Schroeder, "Supporting decision-making and action selection under time pressure and uncertainty: The case of inflight icing," Hum. Factors, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 573-583, 2002.
28. K. Johnson, L. Ren, J. Kuchar, and C. Oman, "Interaction of automation and time pressure in a route replanning task," in Proc. Int. Conf. Human Comput. Interaction Aeronaut., Cambridge, MA, 2002, pp. 132-137.
29. T. L. Chen and A. R. Pritchett, "Development and evaluation of a cockpit decision aid for emergency trajectory generation," J. Aircr. vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 935-943, 2001.
30. P. A. Hancock, M. S. Coyle, X. Zheng, and V. Kelker, "The development of the Minnesota systems task allocation research (MINSTAR) facility," Univ. Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Tech. Rep. HFRL 93-07, 1993.
31. S. Miyake, P. Loslever, and P. A. Hancock, "Individual differences in tracking," Ergonomics, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1056-1068, Oct. 2001.
32. C. Beedie, P. C. Terry, and A. M. Lane, "The Profile of Mood States and athletic performance: Two meta-analyses," J. Appl. Sport Psychol. vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49-68, 2001.
33. D. M. McNair, M. Lorr, and L. F. Droppleman, Manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA: EdITS, 1992. (Rev. ed.).
34. G. B. Reid and T. E. Nygren, "The subjective workload assessment technique: A scaling procedure for measuring mental workload," in Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland, 1988, pp. 185-218.
35. P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds., Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland, 1988.
36. S. F. Scallen, P. A. Hancock, and J. A. Duley, "Pilot performance and preference for short cycles of automation in adaptive function allocation," Appl. Ergon., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 397-403, Dec. 1995.
37. M. P. Clamann, M. C. Wright, and D. B. Kaber, "Comparison of performance effects of adaptive automation applied to various stages of human-machine system information processing," in Proc. Human Factors Ergonom. Soc., 2002, vol. 46, pp. 342-346.
38. R. A. Karasek, R. S. Russell, and T. Theorell, "Physiology of stress and regeneration in job related cardiovascular illness," J. Stress vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24-42, 1982.
39. Y. J. Tenney, W. H. Rogers, and R. W. Pew, "Pilot opinions on cockpit automation issues," Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 103-120, 1998.
40. C. D. Wickens and M. Carswell, "Proximity compatibility and principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design," Hum. Factors, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 473-494, Sep. 1995.
41. P.A. Hancock, G. Williams, S. Miyake, and C. M. Manning, "The influence of task demand characteristics on workload and performance," Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63-85, 1995.
42. P. A. Hancock, S. F. Scallen, and J. A. Duley, "Initiation and cessation of automation: Location versus configuration change," Univ. Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, HFRL, Navy Rep. 3, 1993.
43. P. A. Hancock, "Effect of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload," Ergonomics, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1146-1162, Sep. 1996.
44. R. A. Karasek, "Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign," Administ. Sci. Q., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 285-308, Jan. 1979.
45. P.A. Hancock and J. S. Warm, "A model of stress and sustained attention," Hum. Factors, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 519-537, Oct. 1989.
46. P. A. Hancock and P. A. Desmond, Eds., Stress, Workload and Fatigue Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001.
47. M. S. Sanders and E. J. McCormick, Eds., Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
48. A. Stokes, C. Wickens, and K. Kite, Display Technology: Human Factors Concepts. Warrendale, PA: SAE, 1990.
49. P. A. Hancock, "Hours of boredom, moments of terror, - Or months of monotony, milliseconds of mayhem," presented at the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH, 1997.
50. H.A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969.
51. S. W. A. Dekker and D. D. Woods, "MABA-MABA or abracadabra? Progress on human-automation coordination," Cogn. Technol. Work, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 240-244, 2002.
52. J. Gluckman, M. Carmody, J. Morrison, E. Hitchcock, and J. S. Warm, "Effects of allocation and partitioning strategies of adaptive automation on task performance and perceived workload in aviation relevant tasks," in Proc. Int. Symp. Aviat. Psychol., R. S. Jensen, Ed, 1993, vol. 7, pp. 150-155.
53. D. D. Woods, "Cognitive demands and activities in dynamic fault management: Abduction and disturbance management," in Human Factors of Alarm Design, N. Stanton, Ed. London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 1994, pp. 63-92.
54. D. B. Kaber and M. C. Wright, "Automation-state changes and sensory cueing in telerobot control," presented at the International Ergonomics Association Society, 2003.
55. N. Moray and T. Inagaki, "Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time critical tasks," J. Exp. Psychol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44-58, 2000.
56. D. B. Kaber and J. M. Riley, "Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement," Int. J. Cogn. Ergon., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 169-187, 1999.
57. R. Parasuraman, T. B. Sheridan, and C. D. Wickens, "A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 286-297, May 2000.
58. B. Hilburn, R. Molloy, D. Wong, and R. Parasuraman, "Operator versus computer control of adaptive automation," in "The Adaptive Function Allocation for Intelligent Cockpits (AFAIC) Program: Interim Research and Guidelines for the Application of Adaptive Automation," Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, PA, pp. 19-24, Tech. Rep. NAWCADWAR-93031-60, 1993.
59. C. A. Miller and M. Hannen, "The rotorcraft pilot's associate: Design and evaluation of an intelligent user interface for a cockpit information," Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 443-456, Dec. 1999.
60. C. A. Miller, "Human - computer etiquette: Managing expectations with intentional agents," Commun. ACM, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 31-34, Apr. 2004.
61. N. Sarter and D. D. Woods, "Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots' model and awareness of the flight management system," Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-28, 1994.
62. P. A. Hancock and J. L. Szalma, "The future of neuroergonomics," Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1/2, pp. 238-249, Jan. 2003.
63. R. Parasuraman, "Neuroergonomics: Research and practice," Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1/2, pp. 5-20, Jan. 2003.