-
6
-
-
34347371170
-
-
Data from the HST archive (34) at http://archive.stsci.edu/hst/.
-
Data from the HST archive (34) at http://archive.stsci.edu/hst/.
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
0002169762
-
-
H. A. Thronson, S. Majewski, L. Descartes, M. Hereld, Astrophys. J. 364, 456 (1990).
-
(1990)
Astrophys. J
, vol.364
, pp. 456
-
-
Thronson, H.A.1
Majewski, S.2
Descartes, L.3
Hereld, M.4
-
9
-
-
0000985765
-
-
S. A. Eales, E. E. Becklin, K.-W. Hodapp, D. A. Simons, C. G. Wynn-Williams, Astrophys. J. 365, 478 (1990).
-
(1990)
Astrophys. J
, vol.365
, pp. 478
-
-
Eales, S.A.1
Becklin, E.E.2
Hodapp, K.-W.3
Simons, D.A.4
Wynn-Williams, C.G.5
-
10
-
-
34347377275
-
-
critical parameterizes the current importance of dark-energy density in the universe.
-
critical parameterizes the current importance of "dark-energy" density in the universe.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
34347406443
-
-
A distance of 1 pc is approximately equal to 3 light-years
-
A distance of 1 pc is approximately equal to 3 light-years.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
0001972434
-
-
R. J. Beswick, A. Pedlar, C. G. Mundell, J. F. Gallimore, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 325, 151 (2001).
-
(2001)
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc
, vol.325
, pp. 151
-
-
Beswick, R.J.1
Pedlar, A.2
Mundell, C.G.3
Gallimore, J.F.4
-
16
-
-
33645217173
-
-
E. Egami et al., Astron. J. 131, 1253 (2006).
-
(2006)
Astron. J
, vol.131
, pp. 1253
-
-
Egami, E.1
-
19
-
-
34347391193
-
-
We measured spatial resolution by taking the FWHM of five star clusters in the nuclear regions. These should be point sources because such clusters are only a few parsecs across, well less than the 30-pc pixel scale of the NIRC2 camera. The average FWHM for these clusters was 0.061 arc sec.
-
We measured spatial resolution by taking the FWHM of five star clusters in the nuclear regions. These should be point sources because such clusters are only a few parsecs across, well less than the 30-pc pixel scale of the NIRC2 camera. The average FWHM for these clusters was 0.061 arc sec.
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
34347395478
-
-
S. Arribas, A. Koekemoer, B. Whitmore, Eds, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD
-
A. M. Koekemoer et al., in Proceedings of the 2002 HST Calibration Workshop, S. Arribas, A. Koekemoer, B. Whitmore, Eds. (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, 2002), pp. 341-345.
-
(2002)
Proceedings of the 2002 HST Calibration Workshop
, pp. 341-345
-
-
Koekemoer, A.M.1
-
21
-
-
18444409387
-
-
C. E. Max et al., Astrophys. J. 621, 738 (2005) and references therein.
-
C. E. Max et al., Astrophys. J. 621, 738 (2005) and references therein.
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
34347376448
-
-
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
-
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
34347381433
-
-
B. C. Whitmore et al., Astron. J. 130, 2116 (2005) and references therein.
-
B. C. Whitmore et al., Astron. J. 130, 2116 (2005) and references therein.
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
34347373607
-
-
personal communication
-
S. Komossa, personal communication.
-
-
-
Komossa, S.1
-
34
-
-
1842660891
-
-
J. Gerssen et al., Astron. J. 127, 75 (2004).
-
(2004)
Astron. J
, vol.127
, pp. 75
-
-
Gerssen, J.1
-
35
-
-
33749366772
-
-
version 8.0, 15 December, Chandra Science Center, Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University
-
Chandra Proposers' Observotory Guide, version 8.0, 15 December 2005 (Chandra Science Center, Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University).
-
(2005)
Chandra Proposers' Observotory Guide
-
-
-
36
-
-
34347397291
-
-
Chandra relative errors were measured for the on-axis bin (0′ to 2′), where it was found that 90% of sources have offsets <0.22″ US).
-
Chandra relative errors were measured for the "on-axis" bin (0′ to 2′), where it was found that 90% of sources have offsets <0.22″ US).
-
-
-
-
37
-
-
0038137684
-
-
D. Monet et al., Astron. J. 125, 984 (2003).
-
(2003)
Astron. J
, vol.125
, pp. 984
-
-
Monet, D.1
-
38
-
-
34347383673
-
-
personal communication
-
J. Gallimore, personal communication.
-
-
-
Gallimore, J.1
-
39
-
-
34347401141
-
-
We thank the staff of the W. M. Keck Observatory, especially D. L. Mignant and the AO team. Data presented here were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and NASA. The W. M. Keck Observatory and the Keck II AO system were made possible by generous financial support from the W. M. Keck Foundation. This work was supported in part under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration; the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (under contract no. W-7405-Eng-48, and the NSF Science and Technology Center for Adaptive Optics, managed by the University of California at Santa Cruz under cooperative agreement no. AST-9876783, The authors extend special thanks to those people of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain we were privileged to be guests. Without their hospitality, these observations would
-
We thank the staff of the W. M. Keck Observatory, especially D. L. Mignant and the AO team. Data presented here were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and NASA. The W. M. Keck Observatory and the Keck II AO system were made possible by generous financial support from the W. M. Keck Foundation. This work was supported in part under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration; the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (under contract no. W-7405-Eng-48); and the NSF Science and Technology Center for Adaptive Optics, managed by the University of California at Santa Cruz (under cooperative agreement no. AST-9876783). The authors extend special thanks to those people of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain we were privileged to be guests. Without their hospitality, these observations would not have been possible.
-
-
-
|