Two-year clinical evaluation of Cerec 3D ceramic inlays inserted by undergraduate dental students

Quintessence International

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 575-581

  Wrbas, Karl Thomas ^a,b   Hein, Nicole ^a   Schirrmeister, Jörg Fabian ^a   Altenburger, Markus Jörg ^a   Hellwig, Elmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Ceramic inlays; Cerec 3D; Clinical study; Computer based course; Dental education

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; EDUCATION; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TEACHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; BICUSPID; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTISTRY, OPERATIVE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INLAYS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; STUDENTS, DENTAL;

EID: 34347351363     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mörmann WH. Innovationen bei ästhetischen Restaurationen im Seitenzahngebiet (Keramik): Computergestützte Systeme. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1988;4:900-903.
2. Mörmann WH, Bindl A. The Cerec 3 - A quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: Initial clinical results. Quintessence Int 2000;31:699-712.
3. Hayashi M,Wilson NHF, Yeung CA, Worthington HV. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:8-19.
4. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials, USPHS publication no. 790-244. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office, 1971.
5. Leinfelder KF, Lemons JE. Clinical Restorative Materials and Techniques. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1988:201-221.
6. Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, Mjör I. Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swed Dent J 1981;5:235-239.
7. Schenk O. Cerec Classic: The inlay with Cerec 3D step-by-step. Int J Comput Dent 2003;6:67-73.
8. Stoll R, Sieweke M, Pieper K, Stachniss V. Longevity of cast gold inlays and partial crowns - A retrospective study at a dental school clinic. Clin Oral Investig 1999;3:100-104.
9. Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen HY, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:192-198.
10. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC inlays: A systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61.
11. Schneider W. Cerec 3D - A new dimension in treatment. Int J Comput Dent 2003;6:57-66.
12. Ender A, Wiedhahn K, Mörmann WH. Chairside multi-unit restoration of a quadrant using the new Cerec 3D software. Int J Comput Dent 2003;6:89-94.
13. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinical study or Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:122-128.
14. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Katoh Y. Effect of filler size on wear resistance of resin cement. Odontology 2001;89:41-44.
15. Stenberg R, Matsson L. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:91-97.
16. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Keramikinlays - Klinische Bewertung und Lebensdauer. Quintessenz 2000;51:675-682.
17. Studer S, Lehner C, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Shortterm results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays. J Prosthodont 1996;5:277-287.
18. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-481.
19. Reiss B.Walter W.Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent 2000;3:9-23.
20. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.