-
1
-
-
33646841684
-
Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: Literature survey
-
Bachman L, Puhan M, Rief G, et al. Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey. BMJ 2006;332:1127-9.
-
(2006)
BMJ
, vol.332
, pp. 1127-1129
-
-
Bachman, L.1
Puhan, M.2
Rief, G.3
-
2
-
-
0037117098
-
Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable
-
Irwig L, Bossuyt PM, Glasziou P, et al. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ 2002;324:669-71.
-
(2002)
BMJ
, vol.324
, pp. 669-671
-
-
Irwig, L.1
Bossuyt, P.M.2
Glasziou, P.3
-
3
-
-
17044362679
-
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: Mandatory and mystical
-
Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical. Lancet 2005;365:1348-53.
-
(2005)
Lancet
, vol.365
, pp. 1348-1353
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Grimes, D.A.2
-
4
-
-
0037098147
-
Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic testes
-
Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM, Heisterkamp SH. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic testes. Stat Med 2002;21:1525-37.
-
(2002)
Stat Med
, vol.21
, pp. 1525-1537
-
-
Lijmer, J.G.1
Bossuyt, P.M.2
Heisterkamp, S.H.3
-
5
-
-
22044453957
-
Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies
-
Flauhault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:859-62.
-
(2005)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.58
, pp. 859-862
-
-
Flauhault, A.1
Cadilhac, M.2
Thomas, G.3
-
6
-
-
0037417585
-
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative
-
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DEE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 2004;326:41-4.
-
(2004)
BMJ
, vol.326
, pp. 41-44
-
-
Bossuyt, P.M.1
Reitsma, J.B.2
Bruns, D.E.E.3
-
7
-
-
2942700307
-
The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews
-
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25.
-
(2003)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.3
, pp. 25
-
-
Whiting, P.1
Rutjes, A.W.2
Reitsma, J.B.3
-
8
-
-
9444255722
-
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
-
Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-9.
-
(1996)
JAMA
, vol.276
, pp. 637-639
-
-
Begg, C.1
Cho, M.2
Eastwood, S.3
-
9
-
-
0035150790
-
The quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in ophthalmology
-
Sanchez-Torin JC, Cortes MC, Montenegro M, et al. The quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2001;108:410-15.
-
(2001)
Ophthalmology
, vol.108
, pp. 410-415
-
-
Sanchez-Torin, J.C.1
Cortes, M.C.2
Montenegro, M.3
-
10
-
-
18744389164
-
Quality of controlled clinical trials on glaucoma and intraocular high pressure
-
Javier L, Martinez-Sanz F, Prieto-Salceda D, et al. Quality of controlled clinical trials on glaucoma and intraocular high pressure. J Glaucoma 2005;14:190-5.
-
(2005)
J Glaucoma
, vol.14
, pp. 190-195
-
-
Javier, L.1
Martinez-Sanz, F.2
Prieto-Salceda, D.3
-
11
-
-
23044436673
-
The quality or randomised trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement
-
Mills EJ, Wu P, Gagnier J, et al. The quality or randomised trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement. Contemp Clin Trials 2005;26:480-7.
-
(2005)
Contemp Clin Trials
, vol.26
, pp. 480-487
-
-
Mills, E.J.1
Wu, P.2
Gagnier, J.3
-
12
-
-
0035906286
-
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before-and-after evaluation
-
Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 2001;285:1992-5.
-
(2001)
JAMA
, vol.285
, pp. 1992-1995
-
-
Moher, D.1
Jones, A.2
Lepage, L.3
-
13
-
-
33644789375
-
Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials
-
Le Henanff A, Giraudeau B, Baron G, et al. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA 2006;295:1147-51.
-
(2006)
JAMA
, vol.295
, pp. 1147-1151
-
-
Le Henanff, A.1
Giraudeau, B.2
Baron, G.3
-
14
-
-
20444394060
-
An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently
-
Mills E, Wu P, Gagnier J, et al. An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:662-7.
-
(2005)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.58
, pp. 662-667
-
-
Mills, E.1
Wu, P.2
Gagnier, J.3
-
15
-
-
0029116527
-
Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research: Getting better but still not good
-
Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research: getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995;274:645-51.
-
(1995)
JAMA
, vol.274
, pp. 645-651
-
-
Reid, M.C.1
Lachs, M.S.2
Feinstein, A.R.3
-
16
-
-
0033031736
-
Compliance with methodological standards when evaluating ophthalmic diagnostic testes
-
Harper R, Reeves B. Compliance with methodological standards when evaluating ophthalmic diagnostic testes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1650-7.
-
(1999)
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
, vol.40
, pp. 1650-1657
-
-
Harper, R.1
Reeves, B.2
-
17
-
-
33745657529
-
the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph
-
Shunmugam M, Azuara-Blanco A. the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2317-23.
-
(2006)
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
, vol.47
, pp. 2317-2323
-
-
Shunmugam, M.1
Azuara-Blanco, A.2
-
18
-
-
14744274579
-
The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in ophthalmology
-
Siddiqui R, Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:261-5.
-
(2005)
Br J Ophthalmol
, vol.89
, pp. 261-265
-
-
Siddiqui, R.1
Azuara-Blanco, A.2
Burr, J.3
-
19
-
-
0033562329
-
Reporting of precision of estimates of diagnostic accuracy: A review
-
Harper R, Reeves B. Reporting of precision of estimates of diagnostic accuracy: a review. BMJ 1999;318:1322-3.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.318
, pp. 1322-1323
-
-
Harper, R.1
Reeves, B.2
-
20
-
-
23644432857
-
The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed
-
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:882-93.
-
(2005)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.58
, pp. 882-893
-
-
Deeks, J.J.1
Macaskill, P.2
Irwig, L.3
|