Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation

Demographic Research

Volumn 16, Issue , 2007, Pages 519-553

  Mynarska, Monika ^a   Bernardi, Laura ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347332472     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14359871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.17     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
2. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3. Bachrach, C., Hindin, M. J., Thomson, E. (2000). The changing shape of ties that bind: an overview and synthesis. In: L. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Mindin, E. Thomson, A. Thornton (Eds.): Ties that Bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
4. Bernardi, L., Gabrielli, G. (2006). Between first and second birth in Italy. In: Atti della XLIII Riunione (Ed) Scientifica, Società Italiana di Statistica, Torino, pp. 139-142.
5. Bernhardt, E., Goldscheider, F.K. (2001). Men, resources, and family living: The determinants of union and parental Status in the United States and Sweden. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(3), 793-803.
6. Bernhardt, E. (2002). Cohabitation and marriage among young adults in Sweden: Attitudes, expectations and plans. Scandinavian Population Studies, 13, 157-170.
7. Caldwell, J.C. (1982). The wealth flow theory of fertility decline. In: C. Hoehn, R. Mackensen (Eds.): Determinants of Fertility Trends: theories re-examined. Liege: Ordina Editions.
8. Caldwell, J.C. (1985). Strengths and limitations of the survey approach for measuring and understanding fertility change: alternative possibilities. In J. Cleland, J. Hobcraft, B. Dinesen (Eds.): Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: insights from the World Fertility Survey. London [et al.]: Oxford University Press.
9. Carmichael, G. A. (1995). Consensual partnering in the more developed countries. Journal of Australian Population Association, 12 (1), 51-86.
10. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory. Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.): The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks [et al.]: Sage Publications.
11. Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R.M., Waite, L.J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitation versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74(2): 609-632.
12. Corijn, M., Manting, D. (2000). The choice of living arrangement after leaving the parental home. In: J. de Beer and F. Deven (eds.) Diversity in Family Formation. Netherlands: Kluwert Academic Publishers. pp. 33-58.
13. CSO (2003). Central Statistical Office (CSO). National Census 2002. Population. State and demographic-social structure. Warsaw: CSO.
14. CSO (2005). Central Statistical Office (CSO). Statistical yearbook of the Republic of Poland. Warsaw: CSO.
15. Duvander, A-Z., E. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage. A longitudinal study of the propensity to marry in Sweden in the early 1990s. Journal of Family Issues, 20(5), 698-717.
16. Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to Qualitative Research. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
17. Fricke, T. (1997). The uses of culture in demographic research: A continuing place for community studies. Population and Development Review, 23(4), 825-832.
18. Glasman, L. R., Albarracin, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778-822.
19. Haskey, J. (2001). Demographic aspects of cohabitation in Great Britain. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family, 15, 51-67.
20. International Social Survey Program (ISSP) (1994). Family and Changing Gender Roles I. Codebook. Koeln: Zentralarchiv fuer empirische Sozialforschung.
21. International Social Survey Program (ISSP) (2002). Family and Changing Gender Roles II. Codebook. Koeln: Zentralarchiv fuer empirische Socialforschung.
22. Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In: L. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Mindin, E. Thomson, A. Thornton (Eds.): Ties that Bind: perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
23. Kiernan, K. (2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: trends, issues and implications In: A. Booth and A. Crouter (Eds.): Just Living Together: implications of cohabitation on families, children and social policy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Knodel, J. (1997). A case for nonanthropological qualitative methods for demographers. Population and Development Review, 23 (4), 847-853.
25. Kravdal, O. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies, 53 (1), 63-80.
26. Kwak, A. (2005). Rodzina w dobie przemian. Małżeństwo i kohabitacja. (Family in the Age of Change. Marriage and Cohabitation). Warsaw: Zak.
27. Leridon, H., Villenueve-Gokalp, C. (1989). The new couples: number, characteristics and attitudes. Population: An English Selection, 44(1), 203-235.
28. Lesthaeghe, R. (1983). A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: An exploration of underlying dimensions. Population and Development Review, 9 (3), 411-435.
29. Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: an interpretation. In: K.O. Mason and A.M. Jensen (Eds.): Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 17-62.
30. Lesthaeghe, R, Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14 (1), 1-45.
31. Maines, D. R. (2000). The social construction of meaning. Contemporary Sociology, 29(4), 577-584.
32. Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review, 12(1), 53-65.
33. Martin, C., Thery, I. (2001). The Pacs and marriage and cohabitation in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family, 15, 135-158.
34. Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design. An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
35. Milles, M.B, Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA [et al.]: Sage Publications.
36. Nazio, T., Blossfeld, H-P. (2003). The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population, 19, 47-82.
37. Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, Married or Single. England: Avebury.
38. Rindfuss, R.R., Van den Heuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: a precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16(4), 703-726.
39. Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. Fourth Edition. New York, London, et al.: The Free Press.
40. Rosina, A. (2004). Family Formation and Fertility in Italy. In: G. Dalla Zuanna and G.A. Micheli (Eds.) Strong Family and Low Fertility: A Paradox? Dordrecht/ Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
41. Rosina, A., Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research, 11 (6).
42. Ryan, G. W., Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N.K. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.): The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks [et al.]: Sage Publications.
43. Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N.K. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.): The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks [et al.]: Sage Publications.
44. Slany, K. (2002). Alternatywne formy życia małżeńsko-rodzinnego w ponowoczesnym świecie. (Alternative forms of marital-family settings in the post-modern world). Krakow: Nomos.
45. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of the Qualitative Research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
46. Surkyn, J., Lesthaeghe, R. 2004. Value orientation and the Second Demographic Transition in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. In: G. Andersson, G. Neyer (Eds.): Contemporary research on European fertility. Demographic Research, Special Collection 3, Article 3. Available from: http://www.demographic-research.org/
47. Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(4), 873-893.
48. Thurstone, L. L. (1931). The measurement of social attitudes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 26(3), 249-269.
49. Trost, J. (1978). A renewed social institution: non-marital cohabitation. Acta Sociologica, 21(4), 303-315.
50. Witzel, Andreas (2000). The problem-centered interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung /Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 1(1). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/ fqs-texte/1-00/1-00witzel-e.htm.
51. Van de Kaa (1987). Europe's Second Demographic Transition. Population Bulletin, 42 (1), 1-59.
52. Van de Kaa (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: from changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review, 27, Supplement: Global Fertility Transition, 290-331.
53. Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1991). From marriage to informal union: recent changes in the behaviour of French couples. Population: An English Selection, 3, 81-111.