Bad acts, blameworthy agents, and intentional actions: Some problems for juror impartiality

Philosophical Explorations

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 203-219

  Nadelhoffer, Thomas ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347313756     PISSN: 13869795     EISSN: 17415918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13869790600641905     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ALICKE, M. D. 1992. Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63: 368-78.
2. ALICKE, M. D. 2000. Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin 126: 556-74.
3. ALICKE, M.D., and T.L. DAVIS. 1989. The role of a posteriori victim information in judgments of blame and sanction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25: 362-77.
4. ALICKE, M. D., T. L. DAVIS, and M. V. PEZZO. 1994. A posteriori adjustment of a priori decision criteria. Social Cognition 8: 286-305.
5. BARGH, J. A. 1989. Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In Unintended thought. Limits of awareness, intention, and control, edited by J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh. New York: Guilford Press.
6. BILLING, M. 1985. Prejudice, categorization, and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology 15: 79-103.
7. BRATMAN, M. 1987. Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
8. BREWER, M. B. 1989. A dual process model of impression formation. In Advances in social cognition, edited by R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
9. BUTLER, R. 1978. Report on Analysis ‘problem’ no. 6. Analysis 38: 113-14.
10. DEVINE, P. G. 1989. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 5-18.
11. DUFF, R. A. 1982. Intention, responsibility, and double effect. The Philosophical Quarterly 32 (126): 1-16.
12. DUFF, R. A. 1990. Intention, agency, and criminal liability. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13. ERIKSON, K. A., and H. A. SIMON. 1980. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 87: 215-51.
14. FISCHOFF, B. 1975. Hindsight does not equal foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1: 288-99.
15. GREENE, J., and J. HAIDT. 2002. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Science 6: 517-23.
16. HARMAN, G. 1997. Practical reasoning. In The philosophy of action, edited by A. Mele. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First published in 1976 in Review of Metaphysics 79: 431-63.
17. HART, H. L. A. 1968. Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. JACOBY, L., S. D. LINDSAY, and J. P. TOTH. 1992. Unconscious influences revealed: Attention, awareness, and control. American Psychologist 47: 802-9.
19. KATZ, L. 1987. Bad acts and guilty minds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. KENNY, A. 1968. Intention and purpose in law. In Essays in legal philosophy, edited by R. Summers. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
21. KNOBE, J. 2003a. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63: 190-94.
22. KNOBE, J. 2003b. Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology 16 (2): 309-24.
23. KNOBE, J. 2004. Intention, intentional action, and moral considerations. Analysis 64: 181–87.
24. KNOBE, J., and A. BURRA. Forthcoming. What is the relation between intention and intentional action? The Journal of Cognition and Culture.
25. LACEY, N. 1993. A clear concept of intention: Elusive or illusory? The Modern Law Review 56: 621–42.
26. LOGAN, G. D. 1989. Automaticity and cognitive control. In Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control, edited by J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh. New York: Guilford Press.
27. MALLE, B., and J. KNOBE. 1997. The folk concept of intentional action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33: 101-21.
28. MALLE, B., and S. NELSON. 2003. Judging mens rea: The tension between folk concepts and legal concepts of intentionality. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 21: 563-80.
29. MELE, A., and S. SVERDLIK. 1996. Intention, intentional action, and moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies 82: 265-87.
30. NADELHOFFER, T. 2004a. The Butler problem revisited. Analysis 64: 277-84.
31. NADELHOFFER, T. 2004b. Praise, side effects, and intentional action. The Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24: 196-213.
32. NADELHOFFER, T. 2004c. Blame, badness, and intentional action: A reply to Knobe and Mendlow. The Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24: 259-69.
33. NADELHOFFER, T. 2005. Skill, luck, and intentional action. Philosophical Psychology 18: 343-54.
34. NISBETT, R. E., and T. D. WILSON. 1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84: 231–59.
35. POSNER, M., AND M. K. ROTHBART. 1989. Intentional chapters on unintentional thoughts. In Unintended thought. Limits of awareness, intention, and control, edited by J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh. New York: Guilford Press.
36. SUE, S., R. E. SMITH, and C. CALDWELL. 1973. Effects of inadmissible evidence on the decisions of simulated jurors: A moral dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 3: 345-53.
37. THOMPSON, W. C., G.T. FONG, and D. ROSENHAN. 1981. Inadmissible evidence and juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 453-63.
38. WEGNER, D. M. 1989. White bears and other unwanted thoughts. New York: Viking Press.
39. WEGNER, D. M. 1992. You can't always think what you want: Problems in the suppression of unwanted thoughts. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 25, edited by M. P. Zanna. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
40. WEGNER, D. M. 1994. Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review 101: 34-52.
41. WEGNER, D. M., and J. W. PENNEBAKER, eds. 1993. The handbook of mental control. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
42. WILSON, T. D., and N. BREKKE. 1994. Mental contamination and mental correction of unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin 116 (1): 117-42.
43. WRIGHTSMAN, L. S. 1991. Psychology and the legal system. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.