The social context of early pottery in the Lingnan region of south China

Antiquity

Volumn 79, Issue 306, 2005, Pages 819-828

  Pearson, Richard ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agency; Early holocene; Pottery; Prestige technology; South China

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347300985     PISSN: 0003598X     EISSN: 0003598X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00114954     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brumfiel, E. 2000. On the archaeology of choice: agency studies as a research paradigm, in M. Dobres & J. Robb (ed.) Agency in archaeology: 249-263 London and New York: Routledge.
2. Cao, B. in press. The earliest ceramics in China: the findings, contents, and a preliminary interpretation. Journal of East Asian Archaeology.
3. Chang, K.C. 1986. The archaeology of ancient China. New Haven: Yale University Press.
4. Clark, J. & D. Gosser. 1995. Reinventing Mesoamerica's first pottery, in W.K. Barnett & J.W. Hoopes (ed.) The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation: 209-222 Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
5. Dobres, M. & J. Robb. (ed.). 2000. Agency in archaeology. London and New York: Routledge.
6. Fu, X. 2001. Guilin diqu shiqian wenhua mianmao lunkuo chuxian/The prehistoric framework of prehistoric Guilin. Wenwu Bao April 4: 1.
7. -2002. Guangxi di ige shiqian kaoguxue wenhua - Huning Dingsishan yizhi, in Li, Wenru (ed.) Zhongguo shinian baida kaogu xinfaxian/Top 100 New Archaeological Discoveries of China 1990-1999: 236-242 Beijing: Wenwu Publishing House.
8. Haaland, R. 1997. Emergence of sedentism: new ways of living, new ways of symbolizing. Antiquity 71: 374-385
9. Hayden, B. 1995. The emergence of prestige technologies and pottery, in W.K. Barnett & J.W. Hoopes (ed.) The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation: 257-266 Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
10. -1998. Practical and prestige technologies: the evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5: 1-55.
11. Hegmon, M. 2003. Setting theoretical egos aside: issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity 68: 213-244
12. Hodder, I. 2000. Agency and individuals in long term process, in M. Dobres & J. Robb (ed.) Agency in archaeology: 21-33. London and New York: Routledge.
13. Institute of Archaeology, Cass. 1991. Radiocarbon dates in Chinese archaeology. Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe.
14. Jiao, T. 1994. Gengshinshi mozhi quanxinshi chu Lingnan diqu de shiqian wenhua/Prehistoric cultures of the Lingnan area from the Late Pleistocene to the beginning of the Holocene. Kaogu Xuebao 1: 1-24.
15. Johnson, M. 2000. Self made men and the strategy of agency, in M. Dobres & J. Robb (ed.) Agency in Archaeology: 213-231. London and New York: Routledge.
16. Keally, C., Y. Taniguchi & Y. Kuzmin. 2003. Understanding the beginnings of pottery technology in Japan and neighbouring East Asia. The Review of Archaeology 24 (2): 3-14.
17. Keally, C., Y. Taniguchi, Y. Kuzmin & I. Shewkomud. 2004. Chronology of the beginning of pottery manufacture in East Asia. Radiocarbon 46: 345-351
18. Kuzmin, Y. (ed.). 2003. The nature of the transition from the Paleolithic to the Neolithic in East Asia and the Pacific. The Review of Archaeology, Special Issue. 24: 1-3.
19. Li, G. 2002. Subsistence of Neolithic Pearl River Area, south China. MA Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of British Columbia.
20. Lu, T.L.D. in press. Early pottery in South China and its archaeological significance. Journal of East Asian Archaeology.
21. Obata, H. 2003. Shiberia: Enkaishu/Siberia and the Russian Maritime Province. Kikan Kokogaku 83: 80-84.
22. Onuki, S. 2003. Chugoku nanbu - Reinan sanmyaku no kita to minami/South China - north and south of the Lingnan mountains. Kikan Kokogaku 83: 75-79
23. Ren, S. 1995. Gongyuanqian wuqian nian Zhongguo xinshiqi wenhua de jixiang zhuyao chengjiu/Important results from the Neolithic cultures in China earlier than 5000 BC. Kaogu 1: 37-49.
24. Rice, P. 1999. On the origins of pottery. Journal of Anthropological Method and Theory 6: 1-54.
25. Robb, J.E. (ed.). 1999. Material symbols: culture and economy in prehistory. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 26.
26. Roosevelt, A. 1995. Early pottery in the Amazon: twenty years of scholarly obscurity, in W.K. Barnett & J.W. Hoopes (ed.) The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation: 115-131 Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
27. Saitta, D. 1997. Review of Foundations of Social Inequality, by T.D. Price & G. Feinman (ed.) Plains Anthropologist 42: 263-265
28. -1999. Prestige, agency, and change in middle range societies, in J. Robb (ed.) Material symbols: culture and economy in prehistory: 135-149 Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
29. Underhill, A. 1997. Current issues in Chinese Neolithic archaeology. Journal of World Prehistory 11: 103-160
30. Wu, X. & C. Zhao. 2003. Chronology of the Transition from Paleolithic to Neolithic in China. The Review of Archaeology 24: 15-20.
31. Zhang, C. 2002. The discovery of early pottery in China. Documenta Praehistorica XXIX: 29-35.
32. Zhang, F. 2000. The mesolithic in south China. Documenta Praehistorica XXVII: 225-231
33. Zhang, W. & J. Yuan. 1998. A preliminary study of ancient excavated rice from Yuchanyan Site, Dao County, Hunan Province, PRC. Acta Agronomica Sinica 24-4: 416-420
34. Zhao, C. & X. Wu. 2000. The dating of Chinese early pottery and a discussion of some related problems. Documenta Praehistorica XXVII: 233-239
35. Zhao, Z. 1998. The Middle Yangtze Region in China is one place where rice was domesticated: phytolith evidence from the Diaotonghuan Cave, northern Jiangxi. Antiquity 72: 885-897
36. Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Kaogu Yanjiusuo, Gwangxi Zhuang Minzujigu Wenwu Gongzuotuan, Guilin Zengpiyan Izhi Bowuguan, Guilin Shi Wenwu Gonzuotuan (ed.). 2003. Guilin Zengpiyan (Zengpiyan, Guilin). Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe.