Newton’s secularized onto-theology versus descartes’ and leibniz’, or on the importance of unifying tendencies in the secularization-process

Theology and Science

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 71-85

  Ducheyne, Steffen ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Early modern metaphysics; Isaac Newton s theology and ontology; Scientific Revolution; Secularization( debate)

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347292276     PISSN: 14746700     EISSN: 14746719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14746700500501932     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. J. E. Force, ”The nature of Newton’s ’holy alliance’ between science and religion: from the Scientific Revolution to Newton (and back again),” Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, ed. M. J. Osler (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 247-270;
2. J. E. Force, ”Newton’s God of dominion: the unity of Newton’s theological, scientific, and political thought,” Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton’s Theology, eds. J. E. Force and R. H. Popkin (Dordrecht: Springer, 1990), 75-102;
3. S. Snobelen, ”’God of Gods, and Lord of Lords’: the theology of Isaac Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia,” Osiris 16 (2001): 169-208.
4. J. E. McGuire, Tradition and Innovation: Newton’s Metaphysics of Nature (Dordrecht: Springer, 1995).
5. R. S. Westfall, ”Newton’s Theological Manuscripts,” Contemporary Newtonian Research, ed. Z. Bechler (Dordrecht: Springer, 1982), 129-155.
6. S. Ducheyne, ”Isaac Newton on Space and Time: Metaphysician of Not?,” Philosophica 67 (2001): (esp.) 93-102.
7. J. E. McGuire, ”Predicates of Pure Existence: Newton on God’s Space and Time,” Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, eds. P. Bricker and R. I. G. Hughes (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1990), 91-108.
8. Rupert A. Hall and Marie B. Hall, Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton: A Selection from the Portsmouth Collection in the University Library, eds. R. A. Hall and M. B. Hall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1962] 1978).
9. B. J. T. Dobbs, The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 243-44, 267;
10. J. E. McGuire, ”The Fate of the Date: The Theology of Newton’s Principia Revisited,” Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, ed. M. J. Osler, 271-295.
11. J. E. McGuire—the texts begins with ”Tempus et Locus sunt omnium rerum affectiones communes sine quibus nihil omnio potest existere.”
12. J. E. McGuire, “Newton on Place, Time and God: an unpublished source,” British Journal for the History of Science 38 (1978): 114-129.
13. R. S. Westfall, Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 778.
14. H. G. Alexander, ed., The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence (New York: Manchester University Press, [1957] 1970), xxix, 25, 26, 31, 32, 47, 50,102, 103,108, 109.
15. I. Newton, Opticks or A Treatise of Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light (Mineola, NY: Dover, 1979), 370.
16. Hall H. and Hall, H. eds., Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, 136.
17. Hall H. and Hall, H. eds., Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, 137.
18. McGuire, M. Tradition and Innovation, 4.
19. McGuire, M. “Duratio ejus non est nunc stans sine duratione neque praesentia ejus est nusquam. Cum unaquaque spatii particula sit semper, & unumquodque temoris momentum ubique certe Deus non erit nunquam nusquam. Semper durat et ubique adest.”
20. Hall H. and Hall, H. eds., Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, 357.
21. McGuire, M. ”Newton on Place, Time and God: an unpublished source,” 117.
22. Snobelen, S. ”God of Gods, and Lord of Lords,” 169-208.
23. Jean-Marie Beyssade, ”The Idea of God and the Proofs of His Existence,” in The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, ed. John Cottingham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 174-199.
24. Newton, N. The Principia, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, 941.
25. McGuire, M. ”Newton on Place, Time and God: an unpublished source,” 121, 123.
26. F. Manuel, The Religion of Isaac Newton (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974), 16.
27. McGuire, M. Tradition and Innovation, 13.
28. McGuire, M. ”’Predicates of Pure Existence: Newton on God’s Space and Time,” 93.
29. McGuire, M. ”Space, Infinity and Indivisibility: Newton on the Creation of Matter,” Contemporary Newtonian Research, ed. Bechler, 147.
30. A. Koyre, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1968)
31. Koyre, K. Du monde clos a I’univers infini, (Paris, 1952), 65, 79.
32. Koyre, K. Du monde clos a I’univers infini, (Paris, 1952),93, 109.
33. Westfall, W. Never at Rest, 303.
34. Hall H. and Hall, H. eds., Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, 123.
35. Newton, N. The Principia, 411.
36. Hall H. and Hall, H. eds., Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, 114.
37. Newton, N. The Principia, 411.
38. Newton, N. ”Corporum positiones, distantiae, et motus locales ad spatij partes referendae sunt.”
39. Hall H. and Hall, H. eds., Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, 104.
40. E. Cassirer, Die platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge (Leipzig, 1932), 8, 26.
41. F. Yates, The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979), 1, 17.
42. Koyre, K. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, 110-124;
43. R. S. Westfall, Never at Rest, 304;
44. D. Gjertsen, The Newton Handbook (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986), 369-370;
45. Dobbs, D. The Janus Faces of Genius, 33.
46. Koyre, K. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, 126.
47. Cassirer, C. The Platonic Renaissance in England, 149;
48. Koyre, K. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, 138.
49. Cassirer, C. The Platonic Renaissance in England, 147.
50. Koyre, K. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, 149.
51. Koyre, K. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, 119.
52. Westfall, W. Never at Rest, 97.
53. M. Goldish, Judaism in the Theology of Sir Isaac Newton (Dordrecht: Springer, 1998), 92.
54. Koyre, K. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, 229, 255.
55. Koyre, K., From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe., 226.
56. Newton, N. The Principia, 941.
57. A. Funkenstein, Theology and the Scientific Imagination: From the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), 193.
58. Koyre, K. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, 222
59. Cassirer, C. The Platonic Renaissance in England, 149.
60. Funkenstein, F. Theology and the Scientific Imagination, 5.
61. R. S. Westfall, ”Newton’s Scientific Personality,” Journal for the History of Ideas 4 (1987): 565.
62. Funkenstein, F. Theology and the Scientific Imagination, 90-96.
63. E. A. Burtt, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science: A History and Critical Essay (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967 [1924]), 260-261.
64. D. Garber, Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992)
65. S. Gaukroger, Descartes: An Intellectual Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).
66. E. Slowik, Cartesian Spacetime: Descartes’ Physics and the Relational Theory of Space and Motion (Dordrecht: Springer, 2002), 138-142
67. Gaukroger, G. Descartes’ System of Natural Philosophy, 103-114.
68. Koyre, K. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, 242.
69. G. W. Leibniz, Monadologie, Philosophische Schriften (6 vol.), ed. H. Herring (Darmstadt, 1985), I, § 1.
70. G. W. Leibniz, Monadologie, Philosophische Schriften (6 vol.), ed. H. Herring (Darmstadt, 1985), I, § 41.
71. G. W. Leibniz, Monadologie, Philosophische Schriften (6 vol.), ed. H. Herring (Darmstadt, 1985), I, § 18.
72. G. W. Leibniz, Monadologie, Philosophische Schriften (6 vol.), ed. H. Herring (Darmstadt, 1985), I, § 22.
73. Samuel Clarke, Leibniz objects to this: ”Si l’espace est la propriete ou l’affection de la substance qui est dans l’espace, le meme espace sera tantost l’affection d’un corps, tantot que d’un autre corps, tantost d’une Substance immaterielle, tantost peut-etre de Dieu, quand il est vuide de toute autre substance materielle ou immaterielle. Mais voila une etrange propriete ou affection. Les sujets quitteront ainsi leurs accidens comme un habit qui passe de sujet en sujet, a fin que d’autres sujets s’en puissent revestir. Apres cela comment distinguerat-on les accidens et les substances?”
74. A. Robinet, Correspondance Leibniz-Clarke, Presentee D’apres les manuscripts originaux des bibliotheques de Hanovre et de Londres (Paris, 1957), 140-141.
75. A. Robinet, Correspondance Leibniz-Clarke, Presentee D’apres les manuscripts originaux des bibliotheques de Hanovre et de Londres (Paris, 1957) 147.
76. A. Robinet, Correspondance Leibniz-Clarke, Presentee D’apres les manuscripts originaux des bibliotheques de Hanovre et de Londres (Paris, 1957) 174.
77. Robinet, R. Correspondance Leibniz-Clarke, 23.
78. Goldish, G. Judaism in the Theology of Sir Isaac Newton, 2.
79. Gaukroger, G. Descartes’ System of Natural Philosophy, 74 - 79.
80. Steve Bruce, ”The Pervasive World-view: Religion in Pre-Modern Britain,” The British Journal of Sociology 48:4 (1997): 668, 679.
81. Larry Shiner, ”Toward a Theology of Secularization,” The Journal of Religion 45:4 (1965): 279-283.
82. Philip S. Gorski, ”Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ca. 1300-1700,” American Sociological Review 65:1 (2000): 138-167.
83. Gorski, G ”Historicizing the Secularization Debate,” 140.
84. Gorski, G ”Historicizing the Secularization Debate,”, 159.