The use of the artificial urinary sphincter in the west of Scotland: A single centre 10-year experience

Scottish Medical Journal

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 14-17

  Ramsay, Alison K ^a   Granitsiotis, P ^b   Conn, I G ^b  

^a SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER SPHINCTER PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFESPAN; MALE; NEUROPATHY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAFETY; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNITED KINGDOM; URINE INCONTINENCE; WOUND INFECTION; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOTLAND; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY SPHINCTER, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 34347271720     PISSN: 00369330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/rsmsmj.52.2.14     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Webster GD, Sherman ND. Management of male incontinence following artificial urinary aphincter failure. Curr Opin Urol 2005; 15: 386-390.
2. Gonzalez R, Merino GP, Vaughn M. Long-term results of the artificial sphincter in male patents with neurogenic bladder. J Urol 1995; 154: 769-70.
3. Rajkumar GN, Small DR, Conn IG. Computerised audit system in urology. SMJ 2005; 50: 61-63.
4. Klinger CH, Marberger M. Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: surgical treatment options. Curr Opin Urol 2006; 16: 60-64.
5. Gonzalez R, Nguyen DH, Koleilat N et al. Compatibility of enterocytoplasty and the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 1989 142(2 Pt 2):502-4.
6. Simon P, Zerbib N, Debre B et al. Resultats du sphincter artificiel AMS 800 chez l'homme: à propos d'une série de 47 patients. Prog Urol 2005; 15: 244-249.
7. Patki P, Hamid R, Shah PJ, Craggs M. Long-term efficacy of AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter in male patients with urodynamic stress incordinence due to spinal cord lesion. Spinal Cord 2006; 44 (5):297-300.
8. Raj G, Peterson A Toh KL et al. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantabon of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 2005; 173: 1242-1245.
9. Mor Y, Leibovitch I, Colomb J et al. Reconstruction du bas apareil urlnaire par enterocystoplastie d'agrandissement et mise an place isolée d'une manchette de sphincter artificiel. Prog Urol. 2004;14:310-4.
10. Imamoglu MA, Tuygun C, Bakirtas H et al. The comparison of artificial urinary sphincter implantation and endourethral macroplastique injection for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 2005; 47: 209-213.
11. Hubner WA, Schlarp OM. Treatment of incontinence after prostatectomy using a new minimally invasive device: adjustable continence therapy. BJU Int 2005; 96 (4):587-94.
12. Nathan FE, Ullrich NFE, Comiter CV. The male sling for strew urinary incontinence: 24-month follow up with questionnaire based assessment J Urol 2004; 172:207-9.
13. Rajpurkar AA Onur R, Single A. Patient satisfaction and clinical efficacy at the new perineal bone anchored male sling. Eur Urol 2005; 47:237-242.
14. Schlenker B, Gratzke C, Reich O et al. Preliminary results on the off-label use of duloxetine for the treatment of shm incontinence after radical prostatectomy or cystectomy. Eur Urol 2006; Feb 6 [Epub ahead of print].
15. Venn SN, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol 2000; 164: 702-6.