A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 792-800

  Svilaas, Tone ^a   Van Der Horst, Iwan C C ^a   Zijlstra, Felix ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG ELUTING STENT; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART REINFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZATION; RESTENOSIS; REVIEW; STENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THROMBOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34347271304     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.093740     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1413-19.
2. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials. Lancet 2003;361:13-20.
3. Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, et al. Task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur Heart J 2005;26:804-47.
4. Alfonso F, Rodriguez P, Phillips P, et al. Clinical and angiographic implications of coronary stenting in thrombus-containing lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:725-33.
5. Antoniucci D, Santoro GM, Bolognese L, et al. A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1234-9.
6. Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Fernandez M, et al. In-hospital and late results of coronary stents versus conventional balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (GRAMI trial). Am J Cardiol 1998;81:1286-91.
7. Suryapranata H, van't Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:2502- 5.
8. Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, et al. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1949-56.
9. Saito S, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S, for the PASTA trial investigators, et al. Primary stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: final results of the primary angioplasty versus stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction (PASTA) trial. PASTA Trial Investigators. Cathet Cardiovasc Interven 1999;48:262-8.
10. Maillard L, Hamon M, Khalife K, et al. A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. STENTIM-2 investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1729-36.
11. Scheller B, Hennen B, Severin-Kneib S, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized study of primary stenting versus angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2001;110:1-6.
12. Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) investigators, et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957-66.
13. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Nekolla S, et al, STOPAMI-3 Study Investigators. A randomized trial comparing myocardial salvage achieved by coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction considered ineligible for reperfusion therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:734-41.
14. Suryapranata H, de Luca G, van't Hof AW, et al. Is routine stenting for acute myocardial infarction superior to balloon angioplasty? A randomized comparison in a large cohort of unselected patients. Heart 2005;91:641-5.
15. Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Nibbering E, et al. Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2001;85:667-71.
16. Mattos LA, Grines CL, de Sousa JE, et al. One-year follow-up after primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients. A substudy of the STENT PAMI trial. Arq Bras Cardiol 2001;77:556-61.
17. Zhu MM, Feit A, Chadow H, et al. Primary Stent Implantation Compared with primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:297-301.
18. Al Suwaidi J, Holmes DR jr, Salam AM, et al. Impact on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty. Am Heart J 2004;147:815-22.
19. Nordmann AJ, Hengstler P, Harr T, et al. Clinical outcomes of primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in patients with myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med 2004;116:253-62.
20. Dundar Y, Hill RA, Bakhai A, et al. Angioplasty and stents in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand Cardiovasc J 2004;38:195-6.
21. Nordmann AJ, Bucher H, Hengstler P, et al. Primary stenting versus primary balloon angioplasty for treating acute myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2:CD005313.
22. Ruygrok PN, Melkert R, Morel MA, et al. Does angiography six months after coronary intervention influence management and outcome? J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1507-11.
23. Nijland F, Kamp O, Verheugt FW, et al. Long-term implications of reocclusion on left ventricular size and function after successful thrombolysis for first anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1997;95:111-17.
24. Bauters C, Khanoyan P, McFadden EP, et al. Restenosis after delayed coronary angioplasty of the culprit vessel in patients with a recent myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. Circulation 1995;91:1410-18.
25. Bauters C, Delomez M, van Belle E, et al. Angiographically documented late reocclusion after successful coronary angioplasty of an infarct-related lesion is a powerful predictor of long-term mortality. Circulation 1999;99:2243-50.
26. Halkin A, Aymong E, Cox DA, et al. Relation between late patency of the infarct-related artery, left ventricular function, and clinical outcomes after primary percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction (CADILLAC trial). Am J Cardiol 2004;93:349-53.
27. Ernst NM, Timmer J, Zijlstra F, Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group, et al. Impact of failed mechanical reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:332-4.
28. Pettiti DB. Of babies and bathwater. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:779-82.
29. Mantel N, Haenzel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-48.
30. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997;315:1533-7.
31. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88.
32. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses (QUOROM) statement. Lancet 1999;354:1896-900.
33. Wilson SH, Bell MR, Rihal CS, et al. Infarct artery reocclusion after primary angioplasty, stent placement, and thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2001;141:704-10.
34. Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Nosaka H, et al. Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:616-23.