Theoretical morphology of the crinoid cup

Paleobiology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 337-350

  Kendrick, David C ^a  

^a HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GEOMETRY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

CRINOIDEA;

EID: 34347271247     PISSN: 00948373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1666/05082.1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ackerly, S. C. 1989. Kinematics of accretionary shell growth, with examples from brachiopods and molluscs. Paleobiology 15:147-164.
2. Ausich, W. I. 1988. Evolutionary convergence and parallelism in crinoid calyx design. Journal of Paleontology 62:906-916.
3. Brower, J. C., and J. Veinus. 1975. Ontogeny of Hybocrinus punctatus (Miller and Gurley), an Ordovician crinoid. Mathematical Geology 7:129-147.
4. Derstler, K. 1981. Morphological diversity of Early Cambrian echinoderms. Pp. 71-75 in E. Taylor Michael, ed. Short papers for the second international symposium on the Cambrian System. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
5. Ellers, O. 1993. A mechanical model of growth in regular sea urchins: predictions of shape and a developmental morphospace. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 254:123-129.
6. Loeb, A. 1971. Color and symmetry. Wiley, New York.
7. McGhee, G. R. 2001. Exploring the spectrum of existent, non-existent and impossible biological form. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:172-173.
8. Moore, R. C. 1978. Flexibilia. Pp. T759-T812 in Ubaghs et al. 1978.
9. Moore, R. C., and F. B. Plummer. 1940. Crinoids from the Upper Carboniferous and Permian strata in Texas. Texas University Bulletin 3945:9-468.
10. Moore, R. C., N. G. Lane, H. L. Strimple, J. Sprinkle, and R. O. Fay. 1978. Inadunata. Pp. T520-T759 in Ubaghs et al. 1978.
11. Okamoto, T. 1988a. Analysis of heteromorph ammonoids by differential geometry. Palaeontology 31:35-52.
12. Okamoto, T. 1988b. Developmental regulation and morphological saltation in the heteromorph ammonite Nipponites. Paleobiology 14:272-286.
13. Raup, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling; general problems. Journal of Paleontology 40:1178-1190.
14. Raup, D. M. 1967. Geometric analysis of shell coiling; coiling in ammonoids. Journal of Paleontology 41:43-65.
15. Raup, D. M. 1968. Theoretical morphology of echinoid growth. Pp. 50-63 in D. B. Macurda, ed. Paleobiological aspects of growth and development: a symposium. Journal of Paleontology Memoir 2 (Suppl. to Vol. 42, No. 5). Paleontological Society, Bridgewater, Mass.
16. Raup, D. M., and A. Michelson. 1965. Theoretical morphology of the coiled shell. Science 147:1294-1295.
17. Seilacher, A. 1979. Constructional morphology of sand dollars. Paleobiology 5:191-221.
18. Springer, F. 1901. Uintacrinus, its structure and relations. Harvard University Museum of Comparative Zoology Memoirs 25:1-89.
19. Telford, M. 1994. Structural models and graphical simulation of echinoids. Pp. 895-899 in B. David, A. Guille, J.-P. Feral, and M. Roux, eds. Echinoderms through time: proceedings of the eighth international echinoderm conference. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
20. Ubaghs, G. 1978. Camerata. Pp. T408-T519 in Ubaghs et al. 1978.
21. Ubaghs, G. et al. 1978. Echinodermata 2, Crinoidea. Part T of R. C. Moore, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, New York, and University of Kansas, Lawrence.
22. Wanner, J. 1920. Über Armlose Krinoiden aus dem jüngeren Palaeozoikum. Verhandelingen Geologie Mijnbouw Genootoch, Geologic Series 5:21-35.
23. Wanner, J. 1929. Die Krinoiden-Gattung Holopus in Lichte der Paläontologie. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift 11:318-330.