Spatial-temporal specific neighbourhood rules for cellular automata land-use modelling

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 547-568

  Geertman, S ^a   Hagoort, M ^a   Ottens, H ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cellular automata land use modelling; Spatial metrics; Transition rules

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; LAND USE PLANNING; NEAREST NEIGHBOR ANALYSIS; REGIONALIZATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34347262970     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658810601064892     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Antrop, M. and van Eetvelde, V. (2000) Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: Visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, pp. 43-58.
2. Batty, M. (1994) A chronicle of scientific planning, the Anglo-American modelling experience. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, pp. 7-16.
3. Batty, M. (1997) Cellular automata and urban form: A primer. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, pp. 266-274.
4. Benenson, I. and Torrens, P. M. (2004) "Geosimulation: Object-based modeling of urban phenomena". Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28(1/2):18.
5. Bogaerts, A., Dieleman, F. M., Dijst, M. and Geertman, S. (2003) Case Study Analysis the Netherlands: Work Package 1 SELMA Program, URU, Universiteit Utrecht/MNP, RIVM, Utrecht/Bilthoven
6. Briassoulis, H. (2000) Analysis of Land Use Change: Theoretical and Modelling Approaches. In: The Web Book of Regional Science (S. Loveridge, Ed.), West Virginia University, Morgantown.
7. Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S. and Gaydos, L. J. (1996) Methods and techniques for rigorous calibration of a CA-model or urban growth. Third International Conference/Workshop Integrating GIS and Environmental Modelling
8. Conway, J. (1970) Mathematical games. Scientific American, 223, pp. 120-123.
9. Couclelis, H. (1985) Cellular worlds: A framework for modelling micro-macro dynamics. Environment and Planning A, 17, pp. 585-596.
10. Dear, M. (1977) Spatial externalities and locational conflict. Alternative Frameworks for Analysis, London Papers in Regional Science, 7, pp. 152-167.
11. Engelen, G. (2002) Presentation at MODLUC, Advanced Study Course on Modelling Land-Use Change, European Commission, Environment and Climate Programme, University of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 27 October-2 November, RIKS, Maastricht.
12. Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S. and Freihage, J. (2001) Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12, pp. 681-717.
13. Gustafson, E. J. (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art?. Ecosystems, 1, pp. 143-156.
14. Hagen, A. (2002) Multi-method assessment of map similarity. Proceedings of the 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, pp. 171-182.
15. Hagen, A. (2003) Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17, pp. 235-249.
16. Hagoort, M. J. (2006) The Neighbourhood Rules: Land Use Interactions, Urban Dynamics and Cellular Automata Modelling, Netherlands Geographical Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands
17. Hargis, C. D., Bissonate, J. A. and David, J. L. (1998) The behaviour of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 13, pp. 167-186.
18. Harvey, D. (1973) Social justice and the city. Edward Arnold, London.
19. Herold, M., Goldstein, N. C. and Clarke, K. C. (2003) The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modelling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, pp. 286-302.
20. Herold, M., Scepan, J. and Clarke, K. C. (2002) The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environment and Planning A, 34, pp. 1443-1458.
21. Lausch, A. and Herzog, F. (2002) Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: Issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecological Indicators, 2, pp. 3-15.
22. Leitao, A. B. and Ahern, J. (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, pp. 65-93.
23. Li, H. and Reynolds, J. F. (1995) On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos, 73, pp. 280-284.
24. Li, X., Lu, L., Cheng, G. and Xiao, H. (2001) Quantifying landscape structure of the Heihe river basin, north-west China using FRAGSTATS. Journal of Arid Environments, 48, pp. 521-535.
25. Luca, R., Masala, E. and Bonicco, C. (2005)
26. Luck, M. and Wu, J. (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: A case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology, 17, pp. 327-339.
27. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C. and Ene, E. (2002) University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
28. McGarigal, K. and McComb, W. C. (1995) Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecological Monographs, 65, pp. 235-260.
29. Messina, J. P. and Walsh, S. J. (2001) 2.5D morphogenesis, modelling land use and land-cover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazone. Plant Ecology, 156, pp. 75-88.
30. Millward, H. A. (1980) Externality effects and the spatial association of land uses. Ontario Geography, 15, pp. 17-33.
31. MODLUC (2002) Advanced Study Course on Modelling Land-Use Change
32. O'Sullivan, D. and Torrens, P. M. (2000) Cellular Models of Urban Systems
33. Palmer, J. F. (2004) Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, pp. 201-218.
34. Pontius, R. G. Jr. (2000) Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps,. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66:8, pp. 1011-1016.
35. Pontius, R. G. Jr., Huffaker, D. and Denman, K. (2004) Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecological Modelling, 179, pp. 445-461.
36. Riitters, K. H., O'Neill, R. V., Hunsaker, C. T., Wickham, J. D., Yankee, D. H., Timmins, S. P., Jones, K. B. and Jackson, B. L. (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology, 10, pp. 23-39.
37. RIKS (2003) Map Comparison Kit: User Manual, Eindrapport, Maastricht
38. RIKS (2004) Kalibratie van de LeefOmgevingsVerkenner, Eindrapport, Maastricht
39. Silva, E. A. and Clarke, K. C. (2002) Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto Portugal, Computers. Environment and Urban Systems, 26, pp. 525-552.
40. Smith, D. M. (1975) Patterns in Human Geography, David & Charles, Newton Abbot, UK
41. Sui, D. Z. and Zeng, H. (2001) Modelling the dynamics of landscape structure in Asia's emerging Desakota Regions, a case study in Shenzhen. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52, pp. 37-52.
42. Straatman, B., Engelen, G. and White, R. (2001) Towards an automatic calibration procedure for the LeefOmgevingsVerkenner and other constrained CA, RIKS, Maastricht.
43. Tinker, D. B., Resor, C. A. C., Beauvais, G. P., Kipfmueller, K. F., Fernandes, C. I. and Baker, W. L. (1998) Watershed analysis of forest fragmentation by clear cuts and roads in a Wyoming forest. Landscape Ecology, 13, pp. 149-165.
44. Tobler, W. R. (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Economic Geography, 46, Supplement. Proceedings, International Geographical Union, Commission on Quantitative Methods, pp. 234-240.
45. Torrens, P. M. (2000) How Cellular Models of Urban Systems Work
46. Torrens, P. M. (2001) Can Geocomputation Save Urban Simulation? Throw Some Agents into the Mixture, Simmer, and Wait..
47. Torrens, P. M. and Benenson, I. (2005) Geographic Automata Systems. International Journal of Geographic Infromation Science, 194, pp. 385-412.
48. Torrens, P. M. and O'Sullivan, D. (2000) Cities, Cells, and Complexity: Developing a Research Agenda for Urban Geocomputation. GeoComputation 2000
49. Steen, I. van den (2002) Spatial Autocorrelation, Free University of Brussels, Brussels
50. Verburg, P., Dijst, M. and Schot, P. (2001) Modelling approaches for the analysis of the dynamics of land use: Perspectives for a new generation of integrated models. Networks Working Paper Series
51. Verburg, P. H., de Nijs, T. C. M., van Eck, J. Ritsema, Visser, H. and de Jong, K. (2004) A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28, pp. 667-690.
52. Visser, H. (2004) The Map Comparison Kit: Methods, Software and Applications
53. Webster, C. J. (1993) GIS and the scientific inputs to urban planning: description. Environment and Planning B, 20, pp. 709-728.
54. Webster, C. J. (1994) GIS and the scientific inputs to urban planning: prediction and prescription. Environment and Planning B, 21, pp. 145-157.
55. Webster, C. J. and Wu, F. (1999) Regulation, land-use mix and urban performance part 1, Performance. Environment and Planning A, 31, pp. 1433-1442.
56. Webster, C. J. and Wu, F. (1999) Regulation, land-use mix and urban performance part 2, Theory. Environment and Planning A, 31, pp. 1529-1547.
57. Webster, C. J. and Wu, F. (2001) Coase, spatial pricing and self-organising cities. Urban Studies, 38, pp. 2037-2054.
58. Wu, F. (1996) A linguistic cellular automata simulation approach for sustainable land development in a fast growing region. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 20, pp. 367-387.
59. Wu, F. (1998) SimLand: A prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 12, pp. 63-82.
60. Yang, Y. and Billings, S. A. (2000) Extracting Boolean rules from CA patterns. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, pp. 573-581.
61. Yang, Y. and Billings, S.a. (2000) Neighbourhood detection and rule selection from CA pattern. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, pp. 840-847.